Whilst she may condemn violence, she would sooner apologise for a brute than fall in love with a pacifist.
Truth be told women are in fact great lovers of violence, just only when it is employed in service of them, be it for their sexual pleasure, or their bodily protection.
Women are averse to engaging in violence themselves, and of course, afraid of being subjected to it - given their small frames and lack of musculature. It is for precisely this reason they seek to benefit from it by proxy.
And so a man incapable of violence is no man at all.
Men aren't solely violent, but must possess a capacity for it
To be otherwise is to be rendered domesticated.
And in case you think this absurd
How does a man "make her feel safe" with zero destructive capability?
To neurotically neuter man is to eradicate your own protection
Which is precisely what western feminism did
By viewing man's destructive capacity as a threat + sole evil, rather than as also a good thing that benefits women - they went out of their way to neuter + domesticate their men into harmlessness
So now they lay exposed, unprotected
The philosophical error in their dogma is to view man's destructive capacity as uniquely and chiefly evil, as a threat that must be vanquished - rather than to recognise its duality - that short of eliminating all the violence in the world, you need violence to maintain safety.
Only women could be foolishly arrogant enough to declaw their protectors in the pursuit of upholding an erroneous ideological zeal, and only men could be unprincipled enough in their horniness to acquiesce and be eventually worn down by the insanity of such demands.
Women won't tell you these things, and the less honourable among their number will deny it all
Because such truths are most exposing and unflattering
And most women do not care for the truth more than they do their own reputations
But I assure you, this is the truth laid bare.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s play a little game. Forget the fact none of these people are real. There are five women. Look at the faces of each woman. Identify the most wholesome woman of the five based on facial analysis alone. Note: there *IS* a correct answer. I may or may not reveal the answer.
I will give you a vague hint
A lot of you keep saying the same thing and I can see why you would say that
But it’s wrong
I’m actually very tempted to explain the whole thing later on with rank order of wholesomeness and explanations for each
Society needs marriage, but it also needs to structurally bias marriage in men's favour by ensuring they don't waive their rights by agreeing to it, because without legal protections for them it's all downside, no upside. You are signing yourself up to be asset stripped and humiliated under the current system. You will reproduce, yes, but your legacy will be in shambles because you weren't given scope to properly govern what you were trying to build.
Female fickleness and infidelity should carry a heavy social and legal penalty, to the point engaging in such behaviour is so undesirable to them that they don't engage in it. If they can get away with being shitty human beings, they will be. If a woman knows she will get to keep her children and a fat pay out on top, she is more than happy to fuck over her husband rather than try to work with him if she becomes displeased with him.
Women who don't have religious faith, community pressure or legal penalties for being terrible people will continue to be terrible people, and western women have demonstrated this reality for the past few decades. This is why our families are the weakest they've ever been, and we are more socially atomised than we've ever been - in failing to adequately discipline women and require they sacrifice anything for their families - we've sacrificed the very institution of family itself to their neuroticism, estrogen and capriciousness.
Anyone with sense knows we cannot rely on or simply trust women to behave themselves and be good moral people because they're sweet and lovely. They need guard rails, boundaries and consequences - like a child - or they will act in heinous ways.
The powers that be know this, but for some reason seem intent on sabotaging our societies with rules and cultural norms that lower our birth rate and ability to maintain ourselves whilst replacing us with foreigners who hate us for the actions of our ancestors, so our only options now are to navigate this toxic environment by only marrying outlier women because the vast majority of women are unmarriageable, or moving to a jurisdiction where men are still respected and will have their authority backed by the system and culture there - whether that means marrying a foreign woman in her lands and staying there or taking a western woman to a more traditional jurisdiction is down to personal preference.
It's normal and natural to want to stay in your land of birth and have an affection for your home culture no matter how flawed it is. Most people don't want to leave and travel elsewhere, learn a new culture, new language and be an outsider.
But the system is against you here.
Some people will call you a traitor for leaving. They will say real men stay and fight or something like that. Real men don't abandon their women bla bla bla.
The system doesn't give a shit about you and your own women don't recognise your authority. They betrayed you first.
Clever men are unattractive to women if they're not ruthless, courageous and quintessentially masculine in all the ways that come naturally to the brute in much the same way clever women are unattractive to men if they allow their smarts to make them coarse, wilful and inelegant.
High IQ men are less likely to be masculine and high IQ women are less likely to be feminine because their greater cognitive ability gives scope for the expression of traits the opposite sex detests.
Women don't care for nerdiness, and men don't care for immodesty and arrogance.
So whilst a smart man will generally prefer a smart woman, and a smart woman will generally prefer a smart man, a man also prefers a more feminine endearing woman over a less feminine more combative one, and a woman prefers a more dominantly masculine man over a more timid one.
We live in a society that complains men aren't masculine enough after creating an environment that is actively hostile towards it, but then insists anyone who can actually help with the issue is toxic because it cannot face the truths that threaten its fragile sensibilities.
The church failed in this matter
The schools failed in this matter
Millions of single mothers failed in this matter
All of them complain men aren't good enough and are quick to tell you what is toxic and wrong, despite the fact none of them are actually any good at making men.
People who tell you what is bad for men, or wrong, or incorrect information who actually have no proven competence or means of expressing or cultivating masculinity really have little credibility in the matter.
Their opinions are largely sentimentally uninformed and delusional.