S&P500, $SPY short-term (10-day) Sector Correlations are ultra low closing at .06. In 2021 this condition has preceded sell-offs.
Minor-sell offs that is. Black candles highlight days when the short-term #correlation was between 0 and .1.
There have been two persistent periods of low-correlation amongst S&P500 sectors those were 2000/2001 and 2017 -- in 2000/2001 it was unfavorable for the index and in 2017 favorable...
Across all data, the mean return has been negative for mean returns of -1.65%.
The evidence that suggests it might be foreshadowing short-term turbulence. $VIX has remain elevated trading 10 pts above realized volatility (black dots) despite the index taking a nap -- and yet it has not materially spiked.
Black dots highlighted a spread of 10pts or higher
It has been high both before the minor sell offs of 2021, and at the bottoms.
The blue line shows the 1 week rate of change of the spread, it's not really gone anywhere, closing at 2 points as of Friday the 19th.
Likewise you can see that that by applying a 50 day percentage rank to that spread (90pct to 100pct filtered in black dots), it has been high at both tops and bottoms.
So far in the 2022 bear market, in each overlapping 10d period the $SPY has ended higher on day 10 32% of the time (mean return -.8%). Yet... in each 10d period the $SPY has closed higher at least once 79% of the time.
A look at historically adverse market regimes below 🔽
In 2001, each overlapping 10-day period saw the $SPY end higher on day 10 ~41.5% of the time with a mean return of -.78%. During each 10-day period it closed higher at least once 82.35% of the time.
In 2002, each overlapping 10-day period saw the $SPY end higher on day 10 ~29% of the time with a mean return of -1.4%. During each 10-day period it closed higher at least once 76.45% of the time.
In our historical dataset.. since about later 2007, backwardation has had stronger relative mean returns, especially about 60 days out, but that relationship is not that strong...
But a good starting point is just eyeballing a chart... It's not difficult to eyeball a few times the market got crushed in backwardation, so at least it is difficult to ignore it as a big risk.
If you aren't familiar with $DIX from ~11'-20', a high print( >.45+) subsequently had strong 60-day mean relative returns on $SPY. The chart below shows the $DIX indicator broken up into deciles. The strongest relative mean returns occurred in the 10th dec. at ~3.5%. (2/10)
This can be see on a scatter-plot as well. The black dots showing a $DIX of >.46 and the difference between the means (black dots mean vs. green dots) ~3.5%. So... what has recently changed? (3/10)
A couple market observations... short-term S&P500 correlations at .67 or 89th percentile of the past 100 days despite $SPY trading back to ATHs.
Conversely volatility term structure for individual stocks in the S&P500 is mostly in deep contango as measured by the ratio of 30/60 day IV (more blue = more likely in contango and vice-versa)
And implied volatility ($VIX) is priced under high frequency measures of realized volatility (negative) -- only happening one other time in 2021 in March and often going negative before periods of elevated realized volatility.
Last week the big news was the $VIX term structure backwardating. The chart below looks under the hood at the $SPY component term structure as calculated as ATMIV30/ATMIV60, and is then ranked on a rolling 50 day basis. As of Friday the average rank was just 68 percentile. ⬇️
The Y axis is composed of each S&P500 component. The darker the red, the more likely term structured is backwardated for that component, and the darker the blue, more likely in deep contango. Zooming in to recent data looks like this.
The options market for individual $SPY names on average does not appear to be panicking all that much (yet anyways). Moving on...
On Friday the SPY had a fire lit underneath it, it was the most illiquid day in a very long time. 332 of the 504 the S&P500 components printed 200 day Illiquidity Ranks above 90%. So what does it mean.
The chart above shows each component of the S&P500 ranked by it's liquidity score and then sorted from top to bottom each and every day. What is transactional liquidity in the markets and how do we measure it? Pop open the image below
So if liquidity is good, then illiquidity is bad. The most recent example of a persistently illiquid period is March 2020. March 2020 saw persistent illiquidity with many stocks trading the entire month near the 100th percentile.