Apple has revamped its Mac hardware, but its app strategy is more confusing than ever. @markgurman explains in this week’s Power On. bloomberg.com/news/newslette… // There is some truth to this but it isn't "confusing" to developers. Some thoughts... /1
2/ Once all Apple's hardware converged, the only question was how different the software platforms would be. The techie view is to run everything everywhere, except that can't really work. It always feels like it could, but it can't.
3/ The biggest challenge was always availability of touch on iPad and iPhone and not Mac. But it isn't just hardware but how an app is designed. This is where it is near term messy but Apple does control all the parts to make this work (kind of).
4/ In the immediate/short term, frameworks have not caught on as much as one might have hoped. Apple is taking time to move 1st party to them too. Apple controls all the parts to make this quite good because they can change any part of the platform. It isn't "cross-platform".
5/ Other developers have been slow even at iPad and iPhone. This has been sort of surprising and/or frustrating. So it is no surprise that "just let it work" on Mac is going to go slow. It might be that apps will be a long time coming on Mac, especially non-Switft/Catalyst.
6/ The Mac hardware is just incredible as described previously. But it doesn't seem that it will cause a sudden surge in Mac-specific software except in the already strong/vibrant pro creative space.
7/ There will be many utilities and of course dev tools, but it seems optimistic to think there will be a resurgence in the Store of brand-new software.
Rosetta will fade away. The question longer term on Mac is if there is an aggressive transition to Catalyst and/or SwitftUI?
8/ As much as enthusiasts want to have devices that run everything, regular humans don't really need that and developers need to focus on where their customers are not a full matrix of OS/apps.
9/ But it seems unlikely there will be additional convergence of devices or experiences in the near term. And developers really aren't confused. It just looks confusing on paper if you assume everything is everywhere as a strategy v. convenience/nicety.
PS/ There will be so much debate and consternation over this topic. Even though Apple controls the whole system, there's no reason for them to aggressively streamline (risk alienating anyone) because right now developers are engaged and building where it matters IMO. // END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Going Global…Mother Tree in «Hardcore Software» // Microsoft was very in building global products—it was also super difficult technically—even Japanese typing needed to be invented! A product launch in Japan that's definitely "Lost in Translation"…1/5 …rdcoresoftware.learningbyshipping.com/p/056-going-gl…
2/ With the 2000 wave of products Microsoft was fully committed to enterprise while deliberately focusing less on individual consumers. This is the enterprise launch slide in Japan -- Web, XML, CSS, HTML etc were the focus.
3/ We had a similar corporate launch event in SF at the pre-opening of the *Sony* Metreon downtown and also the original Microsoft retail store. The mayor was there too! Here's a video of that whole launch.
M1 Max MacBook Pro Review: Truly Next Level! // Definitely watch this review by @MKBHD who does a fantastic real world and "totally understands the product" review, not a rush or fast take, but real world use.
2/ Watch the review but some things to call out
• "never heard the fans spin up audibly"
• "could have had higher end ports"
• "could have had ethernet on powerbrick"
• "effectively a mini Pro Display XDR"
• "best speakers on any laptop"
3/ Best analysis: the notch. I feel other reviewers should take note.
• "easy to complain when you're not using it"
1) "seems like it is part of the design language"
2) "ok to put the notch there as you don't really notice"
• "Cuts into display area you _didn't_ have before"
The mix shift due to the pandemic is driving the supply chain crisis -- the demand shifting from services to goods, because people are in pandemic mode and finding stuff to buy for at home. —@typesfast
At the core of this topic is the shipping container—a magic box invented in the mid 20th century that revolutionized freight.
BONUS: Competing with Lotus Notes - new bonu$ post in Hardcore Software. // Today most all biz > N size use Exchange as their mail server (most in the cloud). Yet before Exchange arrived Lotus Notes was a successful and innovative product. A story /1 …rdcoresoftware.learningbyshipping.com/p/bonus-compet…
2/ Notes was a wildly innovative product brought to life by @rozzie and an incredible team. It was also one of the most significant and innovative products on Windows 3.0 and so Ray was honored as a Windows Pioneer.
3/ Notes strength is detailed in the post (from my perspective of course) and amazingly that strength is exactly why Microsoft had so much trouble not just competing but figuring out what Notes was exactly.
Was it an app? Was it a platform? Was it email? What is groupware?
New in "Hardcore Software" is a post about "strategy tax" and when these first started to show up at Microsoft c. 1998 or so. MS was going through a transition from retail to enterprise products... 1/ …rdcoresoftware.learningbyshipping.com/p/053-strategy…
2/ The first time I really saw a broad strategy tax in play was on a trip to Japan and seeing the amazing Sony VAIO PictureBook--first laptop I used with a webcam. Amazing PC. Also it added a "Memory Stick" over time as did everything Sony made. Seemed crazy and annoying.
3/ BillG was in Japan at the same time and I guess he'd been briefed by Idei / Morita about it, of course loved it (DRM!)
In an umteenth meeting on storage, I made a joke about using "local storage" like Memory Stick. BillG "Yes, that’s called strategy. Why can’t we have that?"
"Apple doesn’t advertise any TDP for the chips of the devices–it’s our understanding that simply doesn’t exist." 1/
2/ This is such a huge deal. Intel is certain to bring something new to the table with respect to graphics, but then the question moves back to power consumption.
3/ In the interim, the idea of shipping a laptop with two GPUs in order to compete will seem attractive (and actually higher margins) but will almost certainly lose out and generally not work well--to complex, too flakey, and too much futzing.