In honor of @HawleyMO, a poll.

The title “Nightmover” refers to:
The title “Black Box Warning” refers to:
The title “Mr. Mosquito” refers to:
The title “Abuse” refers to:
The title “The Last Resort” refers to:
The title “ATM Machines” refers to:
The title “Thirty Days in the Hole” refers to:
The title “The Assets” refers to:
The title “The Last of Us” refers to:
The title “Spymistress” refers to:
Ok, folks, that’s it for now. I will post the real answers tomorrow.
Oh, one more…
The title “Anal Chiropractor” refers to:
The title “Juicy Whip versus Orange Bang” refers to:
The title “Undercover Operations” refers to:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Benjamin Wittes

Benjamin Wittes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @benjaminwittes

24 Nov
Ok, folks: You ready for the real answers?
"Nightmover" is, indeed, a book about Aldrich Ames
So far, the public is 1/1.
A "Black Box Warning" is, as the public voted, a stringent FDA warning.

Public score so far: 2/2
Read 18 tweets
24 Nov
Whenever I speak about Section 230, I always use the chat site Omegle as the prototype of a site that should not be immune for third-party posted content. I am so glad *someone*--the redoubtable @cagoldberglaw--is finally testing whether 230 really protects Omegle.
I have my doubts that this suit will survive a motion to dismiss under current law. But if you can read it without seething rage, and an overpowering sense that it *should* survive such a motion, I would love to hear a coherent argument that what Omegle...
does deserves blanket immunity from liability. drive.google.com/file/d/1xVR72R…
Read 7 tweets
21 Nov
Herein a thread of absolutely no importance whatsoever but that may amuse you.

It concerns supply chains, dog shirts, @inlieuoffunshow and correspondence with probably-bewildered customer service representatives.

It does not concern the fate of democracy.
Last month, I was texting with @eve_gaumond (whom you should follow) about an order of dog shirts I was planning from
Clothing Monster.

Dog shirts, my trademark clothing item on @inlieuoffunshow, have their detractors, and to keep @shaneharris, @petestrzok, @page88 and the…
…other haters on their toes, I try to keep a stream of new dog shirts coming on the show—a stream of ever-escalating offensiveness to the anti-dog-shirt aesthetic.

I was bouncing dog shirt ideas off of @eve_gaumond (who is a young AI scholar you should follow). We both…
Read 19 tweets
14 Nov
Good question. Answer: No.
We did not publish it.
We made sure it was in appropriate hands. (It is a matter of public record that I gave it to Jim Comey after he already had it.)
And we published a VERY cautious piece on @lawfareblog about it when it became public.
Read 4 tweets
12 Nov
Bannon indictment!
Get yer Bannon indictment here!
lawfareblog.com/former-trump-a…
I have only had a chance to scan the indictment quickly, but on first glance, it appears to me carefully crafted to deal with the issues that @jshaub and I flagged in our article yesterday.
lawfareblog.com/why-justice-de…
Specifically, note that the indictment does not take issue with any previous DOJ position with respect to the scope of executive privilege.
Read 8 tweets
3 Nov
Why aren’t more people following @BryceKlehm, @jacob_r_schulz, and @rohini_kurup?
They are the day-to-day backbone of @lawfareblog, and you should all be following them. Get on it, peeps.
A word about each of them to begin my campaign: @BryceKlehm does an incredible Donald Trump impersonation, which we featured on the “After Trump” podcast.
@jacob_r_schulz has turned himself into an expert on French counterterrorism and knows a shocking amount about this history of prosecutions under the seditious conspiracy law.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(