Almost funny... The climate alarmism movement, including the UN and the Guardian have been "warning" of the dangers of climate refugees for years. And now they claim that fears about climate migration are a far-right trope. Own it, greens.
Today, the Guardian says: "This wrapping of ecological disaster with fears of rampant immigration is a narrative that has flourished in far-right fringe movements in Europe and the US and is now spilling into the discourse of mainstream politics."
What the @guardian means to say is that the 'far right' have absorbed their fear-mongering.
Needless to say, the UN's projections were false in 2005. And are still false today.
All the same, they have unleashed the 'far right', it seems.
@guardian H/t due to @ret_ward, who has done much to urge the far right to become greener over the years. It was clearly of great personal disappointment to him that racists and fascists seemed to stand in the way of climate policy. He seems much happier now.
@BBC@ISDglobal@cabinetofficeuk@spikedonline Here's one BBC article, which uncritically reproduces the ISD's claims, as though it was an authority to be deferred to, not a political campaigning organisation.
@BBC@ISDglobal@cabinetofficeuk@spikedonline Here's the ISD's "analysis", which claims that "climate lockdown" was nothing more than an "innocuous phrase", which has been twisted beyond recognition, by "far right" anti-vax conspiracy theorists who are "pivoting" from covid denial to climate denial. isdglobal.org/isd-publicatio…
No doubt politics was hollowed out. But by being 'soft'? By people not having to do so much physical labour? By a sense of entitlement? I think the implications are somewhat ugly.
Deindustrialisation is a thing, though. And the political distaste for industry and for that matter, democracy, needs further exploration. I don't think the issue is one of 'culture', because that seems to imply that culture is the business of politics to engineer.
Too many politicians will tell you that 'materialism and self entitlement' is a problem. But that's not what people who face spiralling rents, stagnant wages, rising costs of living etc, will feel. It's only a consumer/ individual culture in the most superficial sense.
They don't want you to drive. At all. And they're not going to stop putting inconveniences and costs in your way. They're committed to it, and there's nothing to stop them and no sitting political alternative.
If they can extort money from you in the process, so much better for the local councils and the private equity firms that have bought all the bailiffs that service local authorities. The first thing they come for if you can't afford a fine/penalty charge... is your car.
Their policies might leave you immobile, unable to work, unable to afford basic things.
But your hardship is progress, according to their measurement. Another car off the road.
Climate science failed to confront alarmism. It indulged and continues to indulge alarmism. And if it didn't ignore them completely, it framed anyone who was critical of alarmism as 'deniers'.
And that's why there are many children who believe they have no future.
The weaponisation of children's emotions for a political project is something that institutional science will ultimately be remembered for, as will its unwillingness to 'engage' with critics of the politicisation of science.