Somehow people seem to be very much interested in what I have to say about "Russian buildup on Ukrainian border", and future of the Ukrainian crisis.
I am not a real expert, and not an impartial observer, but anyway, a short thread might be useful.
1/
It is a hedging and a message to Kiev and its sponsors that they need to stay calm and behave. There are basically two alternatives: 1) Minsk-II, and people in Moscow seem to be ready to wait for its implementation (even w/ 'addendums' a-la Steinmeier Formula) indefinitely.
2/
2) Declaration of 'withdrawal' from Minsk-II by Kiev, and Ukrainian offensive in Donbass, which will end up in a rather swift destruction of the Ukrainian armed forces (and probably some civilian governmental infrustructure), but no Russian occupation...
3/
...(although some territorial gains by DPR/LPR possible). After that we might see self-destruction of the Ukrainian statehood, not that it will make many people happy anywhere in the region.
I feel there is a serious irritation with lack of progress on MInsk-II and...
4/
...a lack of will from Europeans (especially FR in DE) and the US to force UA to accelerate its implementation. It is a serious document, and while its portrayal as Ukrainian capitulation is not that far from reality (a result of military defeat), it was approved by the UNSC.
5/
Sidenote: I see many people arguing that some of the proposal put forward some scholars deprave Ukraine of 'agency' in the process, but no one seem to care about DPR/LPR agency at all, which is simply wrong.
6/
Also, another alternative: no one in Moscow simply cares about Ukraine at all, and all this actions are a diversion from smth else.
7/
Finally, PL-BY-EU thing...99.9% sure that Moscow has nothing to do with it, apart from general support for Lukashenko as an ally, and BY in general is considered a matter of military security above anything else. But people here are getting extremely irritated with him too.
8/8
PS Despite all controversies, work of the OSCE SMM is crucial. These people are heroes, and operating under pressure and hatred from both sides for such a long time is very impressive.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We have a new 3-day series of defense-focused meetings held by Putin in Sochi. Today the focus is long-term development, and we learned that:
- Nuclear triad capabilities have been enhanced
- S-500 tests nearing completion
- armed forces carried out everything planned for 2020
- Kalibr-armed ships contribute to the expansion of the Navy capabilities
- Tsirkon mentioned as explicitly ship-based system, final stages of state trials
- 70+% of Air-Space Forces Air Defense rgts re-armed w/ S-400
2/
- S-500 trials are being succesfully completed, deliveries to the forces to start soon
- risks and military threats are present, so refinement. development and re-armament of the armed forces will continue
- military industry and design bureaues will receive support
3/
Patrushev held talks with Sullivan in Geneva today. "Important step towards Presidential Summit".
Fun fact: Yang Jiechi is in Moscow for the 16th round of RU-CN "Strategic Security" talks tomorrow. tass.ru/politika/11451…
Official release on Patrushev-Sullivan "consultations" in Geneva today: scrf.gov.ru/news/allnews/2…
- a "logical continuation" of Lavrov-Blinken talks on May 19
- important milestone toward Presidential Summit
- "constructive", disagreements remain, but...
...as well as traditional concerns on 56 Trident-II launch tubes, 41 'non-nuclear' B-52H heavy bombers and 4 MM-III "training silos". So +101 deployed and non-deployed launchers.
I hope that over the next five years we'll see such releases on a regular basis, and those will become more Russia-focused.
And, of course, the US should be proactive regarding Russian concerns with #NewSTART implementation.
Some of you might have noticed a claim by Almaz-Antey head Yan Novikov that X-37B can carry up to 3 ("smaller one") or 6 ("bigger one") nuclear warheads: ria.ru/20210522/x-37-…
I've decided to watch a full speech...and now I have mixed feelings.
1/
I've made some screenshots with his slides (sorry for the quality). HTV-2 and X-51A remain quite popular within the Russian military industry...but X-37B hype is unmatched, unexpectedly.
Nice Kh-555(?) footage from recent Tu-160 and Tu-95MS exercise with practical launches:
Also, a reminder that salvo from Engels bombers against targets in Europe will be much more impressive and devastating than any fictional 9M729s from "West of Urals".
On a second thought, those are rather inert Kh-55SM, as there are no "nose wings" which are used in conventional Kh-555, presumably to compensate weight difference between nuclear and non-nuclear payloads.