A new example of how clueless NATO troll farm Bellingcat is: they don't even understand their own claims (probably because they don't write them, as I've exposed before: thegrayzone.com/2021/03/24/aut…)

Let's look at what @N_Waters says here:
I said that no recognized CW experts have stated "that the Douma victims' rapid, and in some reported cases immediate onset, of *profuse frothing* is consistent with chlorine gas."

Blanc doesn't challenge that re: frothing. He invokes a straw man: onset of pulmonary edema.
Blanc, I'm sure, understands the difference between pulmonary edema (a condition) and profuse, immediate frothing (a symptom seen in the Douma victims, staged by their sectarian death squad killers). So he's just being disingenuous. @N_Waters89 I'd bet, just doesn't understand.
German toxicologists consulted by OPCW, leaks show, stated "that there was no correlation between symptoms and chlorine exposure." They cited "in particular... the onset of excessive frothing, as a result of pulmonary edema." Hence why OPCW censored this inconvenient finding.
But here's something actually interesting from @N_Waters89's latest face-plant: how does he know that the OPCW IIT report on Douma is coming in 2022, and not this year? Is Bellingcat secretly "partnering" w/ OPCW again?

I'm blocked, so please ask him.
Bellingcat has been caught lying about its work withOPCW before. Bellingcat quietly deleted a claim that it "partners" w/ OPCW, & @EliotHiggins tried to claim that the "partner" thing was just an innocent "copy and paste" error.
@EliotHiggins It's no surprise that Bellingcat are liars: in addition to taking money from NED & other NATO govts, other funders include spook firms that profited off the Dirty War on Syria. Their job is to cover up the murder of innocents, like the victims in Douma.

thegrayzone.com/2021/10/09/bel…
You can read more about the censorship of the inconvenient expert toxicologists -- whose findings this Bellingcat "expert" doesn't appear to understand -- in my latest here: thegrayzone.com/2021/11/22/cor…

No one will refute it, hence the attempt to distort my argument.
.@N_Waters89 confirms that he won't try to defend his false claim, or refute anything I've said:

Note also the failure to challenge the fact at the heart of this story: OPCW censored the findings of expert toxicologists who ruled out chlorine gas. Why?
Note that none of the Douma massacre/cover-up apologists are challenging the premise of this story: OPCW censored the findings of expert toxicologists & concealed that they were consulted. Is censorship acceptable in a scientific investigation? For Bellingcat, a resounding yes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Maté

Aaron Maté Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @aaronjmate

24 Nov
New: The US media's Russiagate reckoning goes far beyond the Steele dossier. Here's a list of five Pulitzer winners from the New York Times & Washington Post that also relied on dubious sources and falsehoods to push the Trump-Russia conspiracy narrative:
realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/…
1) A Feb. 9, 2017 Washington Post article claimed that Michael Flynn had held "explicit" discussions with Russia's UN Ambassador about US sanctions.

Transcripts of the calls, released in May 2020, showed this was false. Sanctions were in fact only mentioned once, in passing.
The Flynn transcripts did show that there was a more extensive discussion about a separate action, *expulsions*.

But the Post's sources said the references to sanctions were "explicit", and that Flynn even made a "potentially illegal signal" of a future "reprieve."
Read 18 tweets
22 Nov
New: Early in the OPCW’s Douma probe, expert toxicologists ruled out chlorine gas as the victims' cause of death. Leaks expose how OPCW officials censored this explosive finding — and then targeted the inspector who raised the alarm. thegrayzone.com/2021/11/22/cor… via @TheGrayzoneNews
Early in the OPCW's probe of an alleged chemical attack in Douma, expert toxicologists ruled out chlorine gas as the cause of death. Instead of publishing this finding, OPCW officials concealed it, and then investigated a veteran inspector who questioned the censorship.
The suppression of toxicology is among a series of deceptions by the OPCW brass to corrupt the Douma probe's scientific process, as detailed in this new multi-part investigation by @TheGrayzoneNews. More than 3 years later, the high-level censorship has mired the OPCW in scandal.
Read 9 tweets
20 Nov
Biden ordering a review of US military exercises in Europe, amid fears US moves "risk crossing the line into provoking Russia." Study finds that NATO-Russia incidents spiked post-2016 -- when Russiagate cultists wailed that US was led by "Putin's Puppet." washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
"Despite Trump’s perceived affinity for Russia, he surrounded himself with hard-liners... who stepped up military activities designed to send a message to Moscow. At times, the result has been envelope-pushing missions."

Like w/ Steele, reality is finally sinking in.
"A study cataloguing nearly 3,000 incidents between NATO and Russian forces from 2013 to 2020... found significantly increased activity after 2016."

Wait, why didn't Putin just use the pee tape or his financial blackmail over Trump to get him to stand down?
Read 5 tweets
16 Nov
.@BGrueskin chides US media for embracing the Steele dossier, but in the process he does what he's criticizing: accepting partisan-tied, evidence-free Russiagate claims as fact. nytimes.com/2021/11/15/opi…
The claim of Russian "hacking into Democrats' emails" is full of evidentiary holes, heavily caveated in Mueller's report, & was generated by another Clinton contractor, Crowdstrike, which later admitted that it had no evidence.
(realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/…)
The claim that a Russian troll farm used "Facebook and other social media companies to foment dissent and unrest" is a joke. The posts were juvenile, barely seen, barely about the election, and mostly came *after* the election.
(thenation.com/article/archiv…)
(realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/…)
Read 4 tweets
13 Nov
Just recently, Congress defeated @JamaalBowmanNY’s measure to have a *debate* on whether to authorize US military operations in Syria. I wonder if this news that the US massacred civilians in Syria and then extensively covered it up for two years will change that:
As I wrote in September, the US is occupying Syria to steal its oil/agricultural resources and effectively prolong the 10-year dirty war, all while lying to the US public. Perhaps news of this massacre will finally spark some discussion about that. mate.substack.com/p/to-keep-troo…
US airstrikes killed a reported 64 civilians in Syria on March 18, 2019. Central Command spent 2+ years hiding evidence. A whistleblower who challenged the cover-up, DoD IG official Gene Tate, was forced out of his job in October 2020. A major scandal. nytimes.com/2021/11/13/us/…
Read 4 tweets
12 Nov
The @washingtonpost has published major corrections of stories that falsely named @SergeiMillian as a Steele dossier source.

"The Post’s decision to edit and repost the Millian stories is highly unusual in the news industry." For Russiagate, it should become the norm.
As I said earlier this week, for Russiagate -- especially the US media -- there is no rock bottom. There's a lot more corrections to be made. mate.substack.com/p/russiagate-h…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(