first the EC all cause mortality raw data 2020 vs. 2021 (no aggregation: each point is one week).
age: (left) 65-69, (mid) 70-74, (right) 75-79
males (bottom), females (top)
colour by vaxx rate 65+, symbol by country
Pretty diagonal. No💉 correlation. 🧐
4/ No we aggregate this into sum of week 19 to 45. So 10th May to now.
The trend line indicates no correlation to slighly worse in 2021. Where is the 98% VE agains death?
5/ Interestingly, there is nothing to see, to a slightly worse situation in 2021 compared to novaxx times in 2020. See trend line which is slightly above the diagonal (not shown, but it would cross the top right corners).
6/ Now the all cause excess defined as
2021 (sum W19 to W45) - 2021 (sum W19 to W45).
age: (left) 65-69, (mid) 70-74, (right) 75-79
males (bottom), females (top)
colour by vaxx rate 65+, size by abs_value(excess).
➡️No💉correlation.
7/ Now the all cause excess defined as
2021 (sum W19 to W45) - 2021 (sum W19 to W45).
age: (left) 80-84, (mid) 85-89, (right) 90+
males (bottom), females (top)
colour by vaxx rate 65+, size by abs_value(excess).
➡️No 💉correlation.
8/ A map view of this excess
2021 (sum W19 to W45) - 2021 (sum W19 to W45).
age: (left) 70-74, (right) 75-79+
males (bottom), females (top)
colour by excess (0 is transition green/red)
➡️ 2021 is worse than novaxx 2020 in general. 🧐
9/ A map view of this excess
2021 (sum W19 to W45) - 2021 (sum W19 to W45).
age: (left) 80-74, (mid) 85-89, (right) 90+
males (bottom), females (top)
colour by excess (0 is transition green/red)
➡️ looks random. No 💉correlation.🧐
10/ Last experiment: vaxx map and excess side by side.
left: vaxx rate 65+
right 4 maps:
excess 2021 vs 2020.
(left) 65y-69y, (right) 70y-74y
males (bottom), females (top)
colour by excess (0 is transition green/red)
➡️ looks random. No 💉correlation.
11/ Conclusion: Other risks than vaxx/novaxx dominate everything on all cause death. But reducing all cause is the ultimate goal, or not? It seems not 😌.
1) Query EC DB for 2020 W19-W45, download query SMDX-CSV--> file 2020 (add week and year columns rename OBS column to 2020) 2) Query EC DB for 2020 W19-W45-->download query SMDX-CSV--> file 2021 (add week and year columns, rename OBS column to 2021)
14 DYI instruction (continued):
3) Create vaxx rate country file (see picture left) 4) Add 2021 and 2021 files in Tableau: left join by age=age, week=week, sex=sex, geo=geo 5) add vaxx rate country file, inner join by geo=geo
2) Query EC DB for 2021 W19-W45-->download query SMDX-CSV--> file 2021 (add week and year columns, rename OBS column to 2021)
Answer A, C I meant 😅
15/ Update (correction): I overlooked that the end week of reporting for 2021 varies for countries. Not all have W45. All have W38.
So this UNDERESTIMATED the 2021 excess for some countries (as the sum for 2020 went to W45).
Again for W19-W38.
➡️Answer C, may have it.
16/ Here again the raw correlations:
Filter on: W19 to W38
17/ And here again the excess defined as
2021 (sum W19 to W38) - 2021 (sum W19 to W38).
age: (left) 65-69, (mid) 70-74, (right) 75-79
males (bottom), females (top)
colour by vaxx rate 65+, size by abs_value(excess).
18/ And here the excess defined as
2021 (sum W19 to W38) - 2020 (sum W19 to W38).
age: (left) 80-84, (mid) 85-89, (right) 90+
males (bottom), females (top)
colour by vaxx rate 65+, size by abs_value(excess)
19/ Last one, the corrected map for the above 80 years.
Well...Sweden shines green. The rest doesn't look good compared to 2020.
Lockdowns are not good for health. The 💉doesn't improve anything (so far, up to W38). Tbc...
22/ Yep, good to check things. I forgott about M/F. files.catbox.moe/y1eclz.csv @OS51388957
I will start a new thread once I have cross checked the dashboard.
A +14 W/m² total solar increase over 50 years is realistic. Japan alone shows +20 W/m². That’s 10× larger than the minuscule additional CO₂ forcing (~1W). And nearly 50× greater than the impact of sunspot cycles (±0.5 W).
Japan has one of the best measurement data. The analysis is clear. The brightening amount to almost 20 W. That is a lot. But the main and dominant effect is still urbanization, which makes up to 6°.
Link 1: the brightening. It explains why the climate scam likes to start in the maximum smog dimming period of 1970. It is a shameless bad faith deception. The effect is ball part of +1°C. In dry areas up to 3°C.
UAH is a model inference, not a measurement. It can’t be tested, yet many treat it like real raw. Calling that a ‘measurement’ is wrong. Neither Lindzen nor us take it seriously. It starts in a cold period, with no long-term data — adjusted, multi mission stitched SW composite.🚮
UAH is not measurement — it’s model-driven inference. Satellites detect radiance, not temperature. The ‘trend’ is built through weighting functions, drift corrections, and stitched instruments. It’s untestable, synthetic, and not suitable for long-term climate baselines.
It’s astonishing how confidently some treat satellite-based inferences as god in heaven like truth. These are SW model outputs, not reliable measurements. Treating them as accurate fact is scientifically indefensible. If you do so, expect your credibility to be challenged.
London is glowing today. Wide urban heat plume. Not “climate change.” Just real estate and concrete. The effect is visible. Quantifiable. Known. This should be a good study day to quantify UHI in more detail once the IR satellite pictures come in.
2/ We start low tech. Actually nothing more is needed. There is over 6°C urban heat. It's embarrassing to pretend today's 33°C are comparable to 100 years ago. Subtract 6–8°C for UHI and you get... 25–27°C. Welcome back to reality.
3/ Nighttime, Tmin. Watch how they flatten the colors. You’re not supposed to notice the 7°C UHI. We unflatten the colors. Look again: you see it now?
We can also do from SE raw. And we can also show how rural stations look. Frederik does like them. Climate agenda is measured in downtowns of the capitals?
Not sure if it’s normal that amateurs now have to lecture academics…?
The downtown station logs hourly=no need for even Ekholm, no need for re-sampling. Does Frederik even know what we mean? Nothing is adjusted. Also PHA leaves it as is as it only detects breakpoints (not UHI).
Yes. Hausfather & Berkeley Earth are pushing it.
But it’s not a measurement. Not one station shows that.
It’s what you get when you aggregate rot over time.
On the left: 8 pristine USCRN sites. Same y-scale.
Now look what they did.👇
2/ Was wir hier sehen: Die Datenreihe ist ein Komposit (sehr beliebt, wenig seroes, in der Klima-„Wissenschaft“).
Die Messmethode (und mehr) hat sich verändert – von analogen zu digitalen Sensoren. Die Entropie der Nachkommastellen zeigt das – deutlich.