Jason Furman Profile picture
Nov 24, 2021 10 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Today's personal consumption data gives the most detailed picture of where consumers are now.

And the answer is: overall consumption is back, the goods-services disconnect is still large, but mostly that is because goods are high and rising even while services partly recover.
Here is real spending on goods and goods. Note that real services spending has been *rising* even while services spending is recovering.
Look at spending on sporting equipment, guns & ammunition vs. membership clubs and sports center. The former is high and the later is low. But the goods spending is still rising even while the services is roughly flat.
Same story with personal care products vs. personal care services.
And my favorite, people kept buying a lot in supermarkets even as their restaurant spending returned to normal. I've tweeted about that before.
Also remember that the biggest shortfall in services is health. This isn't quite the same as people choosing not to go to gyms or manicures. And may not have the same obvious micro substitution. Although even ex health and nonprofits (which are in PCE), services below trend.
So overall the composition shift is clearly part of the story (people buying goods instead of services). But it's only part--as goods spending keeps rising while services is flat or recovering. So there is also a big demand increase (is screamingly clear in the nominal data).
We do still have an issue with the composition of consumption in our economy. As it shifts we're likely to see some falloff in goods inflation and some rise in services inflation. I expect that will mean lower inflation overall but is not obvious.
In fact, in Q3 the biggest shortfall in the economy was not consumption (which gets most of the attention) but business investment. With new orders so high this investment gap also may be closing rapidly.
Finally, here is a full table about what is up or down relative to trend in the consumption components--and how those contribute to the overall numbers. Enjoy!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Furman

Jason Furman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jasonfurman

May 2
Strong jobs report. 177K jobs added. Unemployment rate steady at 4.2% but participation rate up and U-6 down. Hours steady. A slowdown in hourly wage growth. Image
Federal employment was down a bit but state and local more than made up for it. The trend in private jobs is basically the same as total. Image
Unemployment rate very slowly drifted up for the last year and a half. Image
Read 6 tweets
Apr 30
Real GDP fell at a 0.3% annual rate in Q1.

The underlying numbers are very extreme--with an enormous increase in imports and inventories.

My preferred measure of "core GDP" a better signal, up at a 3.0% annual rate (see next) Image
Final Sales to Private Domestic Purchasers is usually a better predictor of future GDP growth.

It includes:
Personal consumption: +1.8%
Business fixed investment: +9.8%
Residential investment: +1.3%

ft.com/content/58576a…Image
And here are those "stable" parts of GDP. Image
Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 28
Wednesday's Q1 GDP # will have a lot of economic noise, a lot of measurement noise, and could generate even more political noise.

A technical🧵on one aspect: what period does it reflect?

The answer is a combo of pre- and post- 1/20 because of the weirdness of quarterly averages
When I (and most people) look at things like CPI or jobs, we look at something like a three month average. That would be growth from Dec 2024 to Mar 2025. Which is also the (geometric) average of the growth rates in Jan, Feb and Mar. It tells you what happened in those 3 months.
But GDP is not reported monthly (fortunately, would be really volatile). So the numbers are the growth from the average of Oct/Nov/Dec to Jan/Feb/Mar. If there is weak growth in Nov or Dec that lowers part of Q4 but all of Q1 so lowers overall growth.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 12
Four roughly true and important propositions about trade. Asserting not explaining here, will explain sometime:

1. The volume of trade depends, inter alia, on the magnitude of domestic and foreign tariffs:

X + M = f (US tariffs , foreign tariffs)
2. The balance of trade depends mostly on U.S. macroeconomic balances, like the budget deficit and level of business investment:

X - M = f(US macro balances)
3. Well being goes up when X + M goes up. This is both because we get the benefits of imports and also the better jobs in areas we specialize in.

4. Well being doesn't have a monotonic relationship to X - M. Too large a deficit or surplus both problems, "ideal" value depends.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 28
Core PCE inflation came in a little above the already high expectations in Feb. The pattern is the opposite of what you want to see--the shorter the window the higher the annualized rate (and still high at 12 months):

1 month: 4.5%
3 months: 3.6%
6 months: 3.1%
12 months: 2.8% Image
Here are the full set of numbers. They were uniformly ugly in February. Image
If you're looking for some slivers of reassurance, market-based core (which excludes imputed items like portfolio fees) was only up 2.4% over the last 12 months. And "only" 3.0% annualized over the last three, less than the regular core. Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 18
Income taxes are distort trade by reducing purchases of imports. At least they do so as much as VATs do. Which is to say not any more than they reduce purchases of domestic goods.

A hopefully irrelevant thread.
A simple toy example.

Consider a person in Spain with 100€ in income that they use to buy oranges. Absent taxes oranges cost 1€. They must spend all their income this year.

In this case they could buy 100 total oranges--imported plus Spanish.
Now assume there's a 25% VAT.

VAT raises the cost of imported oranges to 1.25€, this is the way it is supposed to be like a tariff.

Of course, also raises the cost of Spanish oranges to 1.25€. This is not a tariff & is trade neutral.

The person can now buy 80 total oranges.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(