Today's personal consumption data gives the most detailed picture of where consumers are now.
And the answer is: overall consumption is back, the goods-services disconnect is still large, but mostly that is because goods are high and rising even while services partly recover.
Here is real spending on goods and goods. Note that real services spending has been *rising* even while services spending is recovering.
Look at spending on sporting equipment, guns & ammunition vs. membership clubs and sports center. The former is high and the later is low. But the goods spending is still rising even while the services is roughly flat.
Same story with personal care products vs. personal care services.
And my favorite, people kept buying a lot in supermarkets even as their restaurant spending returned to normal. I've tweeted about that before.
Also remember that the biggest shortfall in services is health. This isn't quite the same as people choosing not to go to gyms or manicures. And may not have the same obvious micro substitution. Although even ex health and nonprofits (which are in PCE), services below trend.
So overall the composition shift is clearly part of the story (people buying goods instead of services). But it's only part--as goods spending keeps rising while services is flat or recovering. So there is also a big demand increase (is screamingly clear in the nominal data).
We do still have an issue with the composition of consumption in our economy. As it shifts we're likely to see some falloff in goods inflation and some rise in services inflation. I expect that will mean lower inflation overall but is not obvious.
In fact, in Q3 the biggest shortfall in the economy was not consumption (which gets most of the attention) but business investment. With new orders so high this investment gap also may be closing rapidly.
Finally, here is a full table about what is up or down relative to trend in the consumption components--and how those contribute to the overall numbers. Enjoy!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Labor market tightness has stabilized over the last several months after a loosening steadily through the summer. Job openings were up and quits down. My favorite metric, job openings per unemployed, was stable.
Here are openings and quits. They've been telling a somewhat contradictory story in recent months as openings are up and quits are down.
The economy remains on the Beveridge curve--admittedly the tight part of it.
Broadly speaking what has happened is core services inflation as only slowed a little (less than people were hoping on lagged shelter) while goods prices have started rising--with unusually large auto price increases in November that could still be hurricane-related.
I believe it is useful to make small contributions to big things (many engaged in doing that now) & also bigger contributions to small things.
On the later, in @BostonGlobe I argue for zoning reform to enable Cambridge to help build more than 1,000 additional housing units.
A🧵
States and localities can resist the likely regressive thrust of federal policymaking while doing what they can to build a more progressive, inclusive and upwardly mobile society.
To do that we need cheaper housing.
And to do that we need more housing.
VP Harris was right to set a goal of building 3 million housing units. On a proportional basis that would require 1,050 from Cambridge. Unfortunately on current course we'll get 100. But with reforms proposed by the City Council that could be raised to more than 1,000.
I know many skeptics of prediction markets. I don't have an ideological faith in them (OK, maybe quasi ideological). But the empirical evidence is they have worked really, really, really well. And did again on Tuesday night.
A short 🧵 about this remarkable picture.
Markets gave Trump a 60% chance. How does that prove they know what they're doing? If Harris won could say, "but she had a 40% chance" so wasn't wrong.
That's correct. Can only judge when you've seen them many, many times. Do 60% chance things happen 60% of the time?
In Ec10 we should them 15 million data points from sports betting from @andrewlilley_au comparing the prediction market probability to the outcomes.
And guess what: if you collect 100 markets with a 6% chance of a team winning and look at the results you'll see them win 6 times.
The macroeconomy is strong--high growth, low unemployment, falling inflation--the best of any advanced economy.
But there was a reluctance to present/understand how families were still not out of the deep inflation hole. And too much masked by cherrypicking/misleading stats.
IF Donald Trump had been President for the last 4 yrs here are some stats you would have heard more from progressives. Relative to 2019:
--Real median household income down 0.7%
--3m more people in poverty (poverty rate up 0.6pp)
--Unemp rate up 0.6pp
--Mortgage rate up 3pp
To be clear: Not claiming these were or weren't Biden-Harris's fault (e.g., if Congress had passed their child tax credit maybe poverty down). Also not saying that they are the only objective perspective on economy (I omit positive data). But under appreciated by progressives.