Today's personal consumption data gives the most detailed picture of where consumers are now.
And the answer is: overall consumption is back, the goods-services disconnect is still large, but mostly that is because goods are high and rising even while services partly recover.
Here is real spending on goods and goods. Note that real services spending has been *rising* even while services spending is recovering.
Look at spending on sporting equipment, guns & ammunition vs. membership clubs and sports center. The former is high and the later is low. But the goods spending is still rising even while the services is roughly flat.
Same story with personal care products vs. personal care services.
And my favorite, people kept buying a lot in supermarkets even as their restaurant spending returned to normal. I've tweeted about that before.
Also remember that the biggest shortfall in services is health. This isn't quite the same as people choosing not to go to gyms or manicures. And may not have the same obvious micro substitution. Although even ex health and nonprofits (which are in PCE), services below trend.
So overall the composition shift is clearly part of the story (people buying goods instead of services). But it's only part--as goods spending keeps rising while services is flat or recovering. So there is also a big demand increase (is screamingly clear in the nominal data).
We do still have an issue with the composition of consumption in our economy. As it shifts we're likely to see some falloff in goods inflation and some rise in services inflation. I expect that will mean lower inflation overall but is not obvious.
In fact, in Q3 the biggest shortfall in the economy was not consumption (which gets most of the attention) but business investment. With new orders so high this investment gap also may be closing rapidly.
Finally, here is a full table about what is up or down relative to trend in the consumption components--and how those contribute to the overall numbers. Enjoy!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
57K jobs added in June (111K average for last three months), less than expected but probably more than breakeven.
Unemployment rate fell to 4.2%, has been stable for 2 years now, but participation and employment rates fell.
Wage growth picked up.
Two years ago the unemployment rate was 4.1%, now its 4.2%. That is almost unheard of to plateau at a low level like that--and even more so to have adjusted up from about 3.5% without continuing up.
The participation rate fell a lot in June along with EPOP--including EPOP for prime age workers.
The household and payroll surveys telling very different stories--and the household one itself internally inconsistent. Generally means go with payroll but worth looking more.
PCE inflation came in high. And the details were even more worrying than the headline as the risk of inflation mounting outside the tariff/Iran affected sectors.
New NYT: CPI was super hot. But core was relatively tame. Two huge one-time factors raising inflation: tariffs & Iran. Fed can't solve them because they're not about excessive demand. Only Trump or time can solve.
Now the usual wonky thread I didn't have time for before.
The job market continues to be reasonably good (for an aging workforce with low net immigration).
178K jobs in March, much a bounceback from strikes and weather that resulted in -133K (revised) in February. The three month average is 68K.
Urate ticked down to 4.3%.
We're past the large shifts in government jobs that were confusing the interpretation of overall jobs numbers last year. But still, I'll show you the private numbers (possibly the last time until needed again)--you can see the difference between this and total from last year.
The stability of the unemployment rate is extraordinary and unprecedented. It is 4.3% now, only 0.1pp higher than it was 12 months ago.
Note estimates of breakeven job growth range from about 0K to 50K/month. Don't need a lot of new jobs to keep unemployment from rising.