Jason Furman Profile picture
Nov 24, 2021 10 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Today's personal consumption data gives the most detailed picture of where consumers are now.

And the answer is: overall consumption is back, the goods-services disconnect is still large, but mostly that is because goods are high and rising even while services partly recover.
Here is real spending on goods and goods. Note that real services spending has been *rising* even while services spending is recovering.
Look at spending on sporting equipment, guns & ammunition vs. membership clubs and sports center. The former is high and the later is low. But the goods spending is still rising even while the services is roughly flat.
Same story with personal care products vs. personal care services.
And my favorite, people kept buying a lot in supermarkets even as their restaurant spending returned to normal. I've tweeted about that before.
Also remember that the biggest shortfall in services is health. This isn't quite the same as people choosing not to go to gyms or manicures. And may not have the same obvious micro substitution. Although even ex health and nonprofits (which are in PCE), services below trend.
So overall the composition shift is clearly part of the story (people buying goods instead of services). But it's only part--as goods spending keeps rising while services is flat or recovering. So there is also a big demand increase (is screamingly clear in the nominal data).
We do still have an issue with the composition of consumption in our economy. As it shifts we're likely to see some falloff in goods inflation and some rise in services inflation. I expect that will mean lower inflation overall but is not obvious.
In fact, in Q3 the biggest shortfall in the economy was not consumption (which gets most of the attention) but business investment. With new orders so high this investment gap also may be closing rapidly.
Finally, here is a full table about what is up or down relative to trend in the consumption components--and how those contribute to the overall numbers. Enjoy!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Furman

Jason Furman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jasonfurman

Sep 11
The core inflation rate increased for the fourth straight month. Annual rates:

1 month: 4.2%
3 months: 3.6%
6 months: 2.7%
12 months: 3.1% Image
Here are the full set of numbers. Image
The problem recently has been in both goods and services. Core goods inflation has typically been about zero but in the run-up to this year had deflation. Now tariff-driven inflation.

And at the same time core services inflation has picked up. Image
Read 8 tweets
Sep 5
A market slowdown in the pace of job gains, with 22K added in August, bringing the three month average to 29K.

On a percentage basis have not seen job growth this slow outside of recessionary periods in more than sixty years. Image
The unemployment rate rose from 4.2% to 4.3% (unrounded was a smaller increase).

Wage growth was strong and average hours steady.
All of these are consistent with a marked slowdown in labor supply (due to immigration policy) combined with a continued slight softness in labor demand (as evidenced by the unemployment rate which has been steadily rising at about 0.03 percentage point per month for 2-1/2 years. Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 29
The core PCE inflation rate increased for the fourth month in a row. Annual rates:

1 month: 3.3%
3 months: 3.0%
6 months: 3.0%
12 months: 2.9%

But two reasons to be less worried than headline: (1) transitory tariffs & (2) some of this is imputed from rising stock market. Image
Here are the full set of numbers I'll talk about.

Particularly notable is how much lower market core has been than overall core at every horizon. Note regular core includes imputed items, notably portfolio management fees where the price goes up when the stock market goes up. Image
Market core is both better predicted by slack and a better predictor of future inflation. It has moved sideways this year. But given that tariffs are (hopefully temporarily) pushing inflation up that suggests that underlying inflation is going down. Image
Read 8 tweets
Aug 12
Inflation numbers a little better than expected. But inflation numbers also showing signs of re-inflation, both tariff and possibly otherwise.

Core annual rate:

1 month: 3.9%
3 months: 2.8%
6 months: 2.4%
12 months: 3.1% Image
Here are all the numbers. All of them highly elevated except headline--which benefited from a 2.2% decline in gasoline prices (seasonally adjusted). Image
The overall dynamic is core services inflation has stayed high (and even rose in July) while core goods have gone from deflation to inflation. Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 1
The jobs slowdown is here with 73K jobs in July & large downward revisions to May & June bringing the average to 35K/month.

Not quite as bad as you might think because steady-state job growth is much lower in a low net immigration world but unemployment still gradually rising. Image
A small portion of the weaker jobs numbers in recent months are Federal cuts. Image
But the bigger issues is the slowdown in private job creation. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 31
My latest @nytopinion attempts to answer the question, "The Tariffs Kicked In. The Sky Didn’t Fall. Were the Economists Wrong?"

Part of my argument is the economy actually has slowed & inflation has picked up, as you would expect.

Plus Trump called off some tariffs and lags. Image
But there are two broader lessons here:

1. U.S. economy is mostly domestic services. Trade matters but it doesn't matter as much as some of the hype might make you think. (And I confess, I do suffer from TDS, tariff derangement syndrome.) Image
2. Much of macro is small on a percentage basis. But small things really matter a lot.

0.5% off one year's growth rate and $1,000 per household per year forever are the same. But the former sounds small and the later makes it clear it is a large unforced error. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(