Tribunal Tweets Profile picture
Nov 24, 2021 8 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Here is the full determination.
End.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tribunal Tweets

Tribunal Tweets Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tribunaltweets

Jul 8
8th July, pm.
This is the 8th July second afternoon session in the case of Samantha Tempest v DEFRA & Rural Payments Agency. Caroline Airs will continue giving evidence as witness for the Respondent.
J Happy to proceed
HH Thank you. It's that Friday pm feeling and it's only Wednesday
HH Looking at particular challenges faced by TW. p397. Article taking deep dive into trends in CS surveys. Under gender gap
J This is article about survey not survey
HH Do you know who Becky
Smith is.
HH No. Think taken from raw data.
HH It shows further divergence in discriminatory trends for TW - risen - while TM reported fall. And compares against non-t remaining steady.
Read 18 tweets
Jul 8
This is short thread of posts that did not load during the re-examination of Nicola Bettesworth by AL for the Rs, the final post before the problem is posted below.
NB expression of belief is expressly permitted J would any expression of belief be permitted NB not all beliefs would be appropriately expressed but we would deal with that on an individual employee basis AL and what would that be NB complaints, moderation, disciplinary action,
AL – about JH, approach to g/x inappropriate
NB no, felt her passion and care, was personally invested ina solution
J repeats what’s in your WS
NB I also felt that JH was looking at it from the point of view of C and not considering the wider obligations of the org to the EA
Read 11 tweets
Jul 8
Good afternoon. This is the 8th July first afternoon session in the case of Samantha Tempest v DEFRA & Rural Payments Agency. Caroline Airs will be giving evidence as witness for the Respondent. We expect to resume at 2.30pm.
Image
Our Substack page on the case contains all the previous sessions, background information, witness statements (after witnesses are sworn), a number of relevant documents, and a full list of abbreviations:
tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/tempest-vs-d…
Read 56 tweets
Jul 8
The second morning session of 8 July, will continue here. Return, not before 11:55.
We have been admitted to the CVP, should resume shortly.
NC onto GI and Intersex policy, if you look at pg 1702 and para 9, that says in DEFRA an indiv need to be experiencing gender dysphoria or need a diagnosis to be trans, that's effectively self id, despite fact that attempt to amend gender rec act had failed
NB yes
Read 61 tweets
Jul 8
The employment tribunal of Tempest v DEFRA & RPA continues this morning, 8 July. Start time, expected not before 10 am. This is the first morning session. Image
Our previous reporting, background information on the case, witness statements (after witnesses are sworn), opening notes from counsel and other relevant documents can be found on our Substack.
open.substack.com/pub/tribunaltw…
Tempest (the claimant or C) is claiming discrimination, harassment and/or victimisation on grounds of gender reassignment. Central to the claim is the Sex Equality and Equity Network in the Civil Service (SEEN or IP). SEEN has been granted right to intervene.
Read 68 tweets
Jul 7
Morning break 7 July, Tempest v DEFRA and Rural Payments Agency will resume not before 11:40.
Part 2 will follow from here. QT has background, links etc.
Participants and observers being admitted, we will resume shortly, HH x-exam of Nicola Bettesworth of DEFRA.
HH going to move on to new topic in a moment but one topic we discussed this morning, you thought there were 2 gxs in addition to ST, at what number of gxs would there be a collective g/x procedure,
NB inaudible
HH look at 129, we've already looked at not from CA on the same day
Read 58 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(