Will this make any difference to the unhinged rhetoric about racial bias in murder case trials? I am betting no.
"BREAKING NEWS
Jurors found three white men guilty of murder in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, a Black man. They still face federal hate-crime charges next year."
"BREAKING NEWS
Jurors found three white men guilty of murder in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, a Black man. They still face federal hate-crime charges next year."
The killers of Ahmaud Arbery were found guilty of 23 of 27 charges today after roughly 11 hours of testimony.
A mostly white jury rejected a white defendant’s claim of self-defense in the murder of Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man.
A mostly white jury rejected a white defendant’s claim of self-defense in the murder of Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man.
Our court system is fair and our juries, when not subjected to extreme duress by the media and the politicians, deliver justice exceptionally well.
The same cannot be said about the ranks of our prosecutors. Many among them are as corrupt as they come.
The same cannot be said about the ranks of our prosecutors. Many among them are as corrupt as they come.
Once a criminal case reaches a court, in the end, we tend to get exceptionally fair trials by and large. The bias, corruption, and all sorts of ugly and underhanded things usually all happen before the case reaches a court. That is my impression.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
