Important #freespeech case on Friday: Bar Standards Board claims the right to sanction a barrister merely for personal political speech criticising Islam (or another religion). By doing so has it broken the law (Equality Act, human rights law, common law)? reddit.com/r/Actuary_news…
As @JonHolb points out,"If political speech falls outside of the Equality Act on this basis then political speech ceases to be protected. Any political belief can ‘offend’ a different political belief". If the BSB are right then barristers can say little without risking sanction
By implication neither will other professionals (teachers, accountants, doctors, dentists, vets, actuaries etc): if you say anything that someone else might be offended by, even in a personal capacity, then your professional body could accuse you of misconduct. This is madness
The powers the Bar Standards Board is claiming for itself are ones that would restrict personal freedom of speech far beyond anything seen before: it is in the interest of members of all professions (and none) that the Bar Standards Board's claims do not succeed. #FreeSpeech
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#BSBFreeSpeech (Continuing under a new chain) to avoid tagging others in. Mr H: ground 2 of appeal. This is only needed if ground 1 fails. Refers to Miller. Knowles J deals with interference with right of freedom of expression. Anything which impedes constitutes interference
... comparatively little is needed for it to constitute interference. Apart from the fact that I am subject to a warning, the BSB has also said that I have breached the handbook. Mr Miller had a conversation with PC Gold who had turned up to his workplace to discuss tweets
Mr Miller felt a deep sense of concern and embarrassment because of this. If you look at the very widely worded and ill defined warning that I have received from the BSB, I could have very similar feelings. The police's actions had a chilling effect on Miller.