Ryan Hisner Profile picture
Nov 25, 2021 9 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/9 Something seemed familiar about the Q498R mutation. Then I remembered: @_b_meyer, examining in-vitro evolution of RBD mutations, predicted this mutation could emerge & lead to a variant with higher infectivity & immune evasion than any existing ones. nature.com/articles/s4156…
2/9 Q498R was not just one of many mutations they predicted: it was far & away their top candidate to become a major RBD mutation. It's the only novel mutation they mention in the abstract, noting that it requires the N501Y mutation to confer increased ACE2 binding affinity.
3/9 They used yeast to display human ACE2 receptors, then let various versions of SARS-CoV-2 S RBD compete against one another, with the highest binding-affinity RBDs advancing to the next round.
4/9 Random mutations were introduced in ways I'm not competent to explain, so I've included the relevant description in the screenshot below.
5/9 Mutations common in known VOCs quickly emerged, especially E484K and N501Y, which quickly became dominant. To me, this seems a good indication that their methods are valid & useful.
6/9 For library B5, they used ACE2 that required extremely high binding affinity, & this "resulted in the fixation of mutations E484K, Q498R and N501Y in all sequenced clones." Q498R was present in all the RBD variants with the highest binding affinity.
7/9 Figure 2f shows binding affinity on the x-axis and makes clear the ability of Q498R to increase ACE 2 binding affinity, hence their prediction that this mutation could emerge & spread.
8/9 Perhaps even more worrying, computer modeling by this team indicates that Q498R could confer a significant amount of immune evasion on any variant possessing it. No wonder this new SA variant is the first to worry @GuptaR_lab since the emergence of Delta.
9/9 I'm not an expert, so if I've made any errors or mischaracterized anything above, I welcome corrections from real experts. Besides @_b_meyer, the only other authors on the study on Twitter I could find were @Matthew_Gagne_ and @Nadav_Elad.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Hisner

Ryan Hisner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LongDesertTrain

Jul 7
Quick 🧵on previous variants that resemble the recent Ontario SARS-2 saltation variant that's now been detected in 4 sewersheds in NYC and one in Utah.

The practical impact of these variants ranged from ~zero to modest to major. 1/10

Background 🧵👇
• BA.2.87.1 - Appeared suddenly Sept 2023, spread across South Africa, & was detected in WW in Thailand. Then basically disappeared after Dec 2023 (apart from 1 seq collected in May 2024 from Eswatini). Emerged just when JN.1 was sweeping—bad timing. 2/
• BA.2.83 - One of several BA.2 saltation variants that emerged in late 2022. First appeared in India, then in Denmark, Canada, and Australia. Could not compete with BA.2.75 and BA.5 though and disappeared without making any real impact. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Jul 4
A mysterious, unusually diverse saltation lineage descended from KP.3.1.1 (last seen early 2025) has circulated at a low level for ~8 months in Ontario (see 🧵on next post).

Seemed a local anomaly, but @solidevidence just spied a weird spike in NYC WW—& it's the same one!
1/14
Here's a post I made a couple weeks ago when another Ontario sequence from this lineage showed up.

2/14
The remarkable diversity of this lineage raises questions about its origin and the conditions in which it spread and evolved.

Notably, the version detected in NYC wastewater is the same as the two most recent sequences from Ontario (long, bottom branch w/2 seqs below).
3/14 Image
Read 15 tweets
Jun 19
Wildly diverse branch of MC.10.1.7 (KP.3.1.1 descendant, died out early 2025) in Ontario.

It's apparently been circulating at a low level for the past year. ≥6 different people are represented here.

I think this must involve one or more chronic infections + transmission. 1/7 Image
• Busy 630 loop: ∆621-622 + NVFQ->IFPMAE at S:641-644.

• 2-nuc muts: W452K + D839K.

• Ultra-rare S2 insertion: ins791P

M:H155N, ORF1a:R3164H, & ORF3a:255-256 deletions cluster in chronics, often w/S:D936H/Y or ORF1a:L3201P. Intriguingly, D936Y was in the last seq.
2/7 Image
More info on this unusual branch can be found on the Github page for undesignated lineages, which Fede Gueli tirelessly and selflessly keeps up to date.

3/7github.com/sars-cov-2-var…
Read 8 tweets
Jun 10
Another fantastic preprint on BA.3.2's propensity for children, this time from @yunlong_cao & co.
They not only confirm the findings of David Ho's lab (that kids have ~0 antibody response to BA.3.2) but dig into the details of exactly why kids are so vulnerable to BA.3.2.

1/4
Two big wins for vaccination & mRNA vaccines:

1. Kids vaccinated before being infected have robust antibodies against BA.3.2

2. Unvaxed adults much more vulnerable to BA.3.2, esp. compared to mRNA-vaxed adults.

Read @yunlong_cao's 🧵 & very readable paper for details. 2/4 Image
There's still one major paradox here I can't wrap my head around: countries with the highest vaccination rates & the lowest proportion of children appear—very low sequencing makes hard conclusions difficult—to have the highest proportion of BA.3.2. 3/4
Read 6 tweets
Jun 4
New data from David Ho's lab showing that while adults & kids have ~equal antibody responses to XFG & NB.1.8.1, children have essentially no neutralizing antibodies to BA.3.2.

This seems to largely solve the BA.3.2 + kids mystery. 1/14 Image
If you've missed the story about how BA.3.2 (a novel, divergent saltation variant) is hugely overrepresented in sequences from children, this was my original (very quick) analysis, which subsequent data extended & confirmed. 2/
More details from this preprint. 50 is the limit of detection (i.e. zero). Nearly all kids under 7 had no detectable nAbs to BA.3.2, despite robust nAb titers against NB.1.8.1 & XFG.

Notably, most kids also had zero nAbs to ancestral D614G or XBB.1.5. 3/
biorxiv.org/content/10.648…Image
Read 14 tweets
Mar 26
So it's clear that BA.3.2 preferentially infects children, something we have never seen before in a SARS-CoV-2 variant.

Why?

The question's baffled me, but after a suggestion from Darren Martin, I think I have an explanation that makes sense.
1/16
I've tried to make sense of BA.3.2's penchant for kids by considering its unique spike: more compact, more closed, & more antibody-evasive than any other variant.

But I think another feature of BA.3.2 is responsible: its wholesale deletion of ORF7a, ORF7b, & ORF8 (∆ORF78).
2/
∆ORF78 is rare but not unheard of; it was in several late XBB variants (GW.5.1.1, FW.1.1, GE.1.2, etc) & a few branches of other variants. I've long thought these late XBB had an advantage in some population subsector, but I didn't suspect kids.
3/
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(