Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Ryan Hisner Profile picture
Ryan Hisner
@LongDesertTrain
Teacher "Be ruthless with systems and be kind to people." Michael Brooks, 1983-2020
37 subscribers
Oct 22 • 12 tweets • 5 min read
I beg to differ! If it is not a sequencing mistake—and it looks clean—one of these BA.3.2 has something completely novel in SARS-CoV-2 evolution: an FCS-adjacent deletion!

One of the two QT repeats appears to have been deleted. I've never seen anything like this before. Image Work by @TheMenacheryLab looked at a similar, more extensive, deletion. They deleted both QT repeats plus the next AA (∆QTQTN). In Vero cells (monkey kidney cells), it produced extra-large plaques & outcompeted WT virus—similar to furin cleavage site (FCS)-deletion mutants. 2/12 Image
Oct 13 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
There's a new BA.3.2.2 from South Africa today. For the most part, there's been little substantial change in BA.3.2 over the past few months—mostly synonymous mutations & very little happening in spike.

But this new one has 3 spike mutations & looks quite interesting. 1/7 Image For those not following closely, here's a 🧵 I made about BA.3.2 (not yet designated at the time) that I made some months ago, when it first burst upon the scene. 2/7
Sep 26 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
Attenuation of the SARS-2 furin-cleavage site (FCS) continues apace. It's beginning to look as if some form of FCS-weakening mutation might well become fixed in the near future. Collectively, they are at ~12% globally—a totally unprecedented level—& rising quickly. 1/4 Image In South America, this may have already happened. Recent sequences are scarce, but they nearly all have some sort of FCS-weakening mutation, mostly S:S680P in XFG.3.4.1, but with several others (S680F, S680Y, R683Q, R683W) contributing as well. 2/4 Image
Sep 4 • 10 tweets • 4 min read
There's been some speculation about why, despite persistent immune activation, germinal center activity, & overall elevated Ab levels, LC patients here had very low anti-spike Ab titers. I want to highlight one interesting speculative hypothesis & offer another possibility. 1/10 The ever-fertile mind of @Nucleocapsoid proffers the possibility that exosomes could be responsible for viral spread in some tissue reservoirs. I don't know much about this topic and so don't have much to say at the moment, but I'm trying to l learn. 2/
Sep 2 • 33 tweets • 10 min read
A fascinating new preprint w/one very unexpected finding suggests, I believe, that a large proportion of Long Covid may be due to chronic infection in a particular bodily niche, which could be crucial for finding effective LC treatments. It requires some explaining. 🧵 1/33 Image First, a brief summary of the relevant parts of the preprint. They examined 30 people (from NIH RECOVER cohort) for 6 months after they had Covid, taking detailed blood immunological markers at 3 time points. 20 had Long Covid (PASC), 10 did not (CONV). 2/ biorxiv.org/content/10.110…Image
Jul 30 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
Wow, BA.3.2 hits its 4th continent with a new sequence from Western Australia.

Reminder: BA.3.2 is a saltation variant resulting from a ~3-year chronic infection. It is very different from and more immune-evasive than all other current variants. 1/4 Image It was collected July 15, & is most closely related to the recent S African seqs from May & June.

It has an NSP5 mutation known to be beneficial (ORF1a:K3353R) & 2 new NSP12 mutations, which is unusual. Its 9 synonymous mutations indicate it has been circulating somewhere. 2/4 Image
Jul 7 • 9 tweets • 4 min read
BA.3.2 update: another sequence from the Netherlands, June 18 collection.

It belongs on the same branch as the GBW travel seq (tree gets confused by ORF7-8 deletion). Also, there are 3 artifactual muts in the GBW sequence (as usual), so the branch is shorter than it looks. Image Bottom line, in my view: BA.3.2 has spread internationally & is likely growing, but very slowly. If nothing changes, its advantage vs circulating lineages, which seem stuck in an evolutionary rut, will likely gradually grow as immunity to dominant variants solidifies... 2/9
Jul 2 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Quick BA.3.2 update. Another BA.3.2.2 (S:K356T+S:A575S branch) from South Africa via pneumonia surveillance.

This means that 40% of SARS-CoV-2 sequences from SA collected since April 1 (2/5) and 50% collected after May 1 (1/2) are BA.3.2. Its foothold seems strong there. 1/3 2 interesting aspects of the new BA.3.2:
1. ORF1b:R1315C (NSP13_R392C)—This mut is in all Omicron *except* BA.3. So this may well be adaptive.

2. S:Q183H—First known antigenic spike mut seen in BA.3.2, not a major one, but one we've seen before—eg, LB.1/JN.1.9.2.1 2/3 Image
Jun 29 • 11 tweets • 4 min read
BA.3.2 update, Chapter: "I'm Not Quite Dead, Sir"

A new sequence from a traveler to the USA from the Netherlands was uploaded yesterday, with a collection date of June 17. 1/10 Image This was a BA.3.2.1, the branch with S:H681R + S:P1162R (not S:K356T + S:A575S).

An updated, annotated version of the BA.3.2 Usher tree pictured below.

This sequence has the first new spike mutation since BA.3.2 emerged in November 2024—S:V227L. 2/10 Image
Jun 27 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
@yaem98684142 @TBM4_JP This analysis is extremely flawed.

There is nothing abnormal about BA.2.86 appearing in multiple countries shortly after discovery. This has been the norm lately w/reduced surveillance. 1/ @yaem98684142 @TBM4_JP The mutational spectrum analysis is poorly done. It cites a single study looking at the mutational spectrum in *three* immunocompromised individuals. Needless to say, this sample size is WAY too small. 3/
Jun 19 • 11 tweets • 4 min read
Interesting recombinant showed up today from Texas. It's a mixture of B.1.595, BA.1, and some flavor of JN.1. Most of the genome is from B.1.595. The ancestry of this one is clear: it directly descends from a B.1.595 sequence collected in January 2023, also in Texas. 1/11 Image When the B.1.595 was collected this infection was >1 yr old, w/no sign of Omicron. BA.1 ceased circulating ~1 year prior.
Now a BA.1 spike appears w/just 5 changes from baseline BA.1, none in the RBD—S12F, T76I, Q271K, R765H, S939F.

This is a zombie BA.1 spike. 2/ Image
May 31 • 35 tweets • 12 min read
An awesome preprint on the novel, unsung SARS-CoV-2 N* protein came out recently, authored by @corcoran_lab & Rory Mulloy. I’ve previously written on N*’s demise in XEC, the top variant in late 2024/early 2025. But…
1/34 …this preprint, along with another great study by the @DavidLVBauer, @theosanderson, @PeacockFlu & others prompted me to take a closer look...
2/34biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
May 15 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
@DameSunshine @SharonBurnabyBC B.1.1.529 wasn't/isn't a real variant; it's a placeholder that represents a putative ancestor of BA.1/BA.2/BA.3.

Bad sequences and/or coinfections tend to get categorized as B.1.1.529:—they have enough Omicron muts to be ID'd as Omicron but so much dropout/mixed signals...
1/ @DameSunshine @SharonBurnabyBC ...that a specific designation isn't possible. Travel sequencing in the US is done by Ginkgo Bioworks. Their sequences are generally poor quality & they upload *pooled* sequences—against database guidelines. The B.1.1.529 here are likely low-quality/pooled sequences from GBW.
2/
May 2 • 9 tweets • 4 min read
Incredible how quickly @yunlong_cao & co provide us w/info on the latest emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Already, we have great data on BA.3.2 (the divergent saltation lineage detected in South Africa & the Netherlands & NB.1.8.1, an emerging contender for global dominance. 1/9 Image
Image BA.3.2 is a clear outlier on the antigenic cartography map—as expected given the enormous differences between its spike protein & every other circulating variant. 2/9
Image
Apr 25 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
About 1 month after this monster BQ.1.1 appeared, an even more extreme sequence has shown up in Alberta. Like the BQ, it has 50 private spike mutations, but it also has >40 AA mutations elsewhere in the genome. 1/6 Image They include the full panoply of NSP3, NSP12, & N muts I've written about previously. ORF1a:S4398L is the most common mutation in the 4395-4398 region, this has ∆S4398, a rarity also seen in a few other extremely divergent seqs w/this constellation. 2/6 Image
Apr 10 • 19 tweets • 6 min read
A fascinating SARS-CoV-2 sequence was recently uploaded—collected from a dog in Kazakhstan in July 2022.

Usher places the seq 1 nuc mut from the Wuhan ref seq—C21846T/S:T95I—i.e. pre-D614G. Could this seq somehow have a close connection to the first days of the pandemic?
1/19 Image Of the sequences near this one on the tree, all are low-quality & clearly bad BA.1 or Delta sequences. The only genuine one is from the UK, collected April 2020. So it's likely even S:T95I was not inherited.

This sequence has several fascinating aspects. 2/ Image
Mar 12 • 13 tweets • 5 min read
Do you remember BA.3—the weakling cousin of BA.1 & BA.2 that seemed to take the worst from each & had weaker ACE2 binding than even the ancestral Wuhan Virus?

After 3 years, BA.3 is back.

And it is transmitting.

Who saw this coming?
1/13 Image While the full extent of the new BA.3’s spread is not known, it’s been detected in 2 different South African regions through regular (not targeted) surveillance by @Dikeled61970012, @Tuliodna, & the invaluable South African virology community.
2/13
github.com/cov-lineages/p…
Jan 2 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
Two quick notes on the state of chronic-infection SARS-CoV-2 seqs

#1) ~3 years after its peak, BA.1 is still showing up in nasal swab seqs—despite reduced surveillance—most recently a mid-late Dec BA.1 from Nebraska.

#2) Chronic JN.1 seqs now more common, w/1 peculiarity

1/12 While BA.1 still show up semi-regularly, pre-Omicron seqs are much rarer. Why? I think there are four major reasons, two obvious & two less obvious.

A) Time.
This one’s obvious: Over time, some chronic infections are cleared, while in other cases, the host dies.

2/12
Dec 23, 2024 • 64 tweets • 20 min read
Fantastic review on chronic SARS-CoV-2 infections by virological superstars Richard Neher & Alex Sigal in Nature Microbiology. I’ll do a short overview, outline a couple minor quibbles, & defend the honor of ORF9b w/some stats & 3 striking sequences from the past week.
1/64 Image First, let me say that this is well-written, extremely readable, and accessible to non-experts, so you should go read the full paper yourself, if you can find a way to access it. (Just realized it’s paywalled, ugh.) 2/64nature.com/articles/s4157…
Dec 6, 2024 • 33 tweets • 9 min read
In SARS-2 evolution, amino acid (AA) mutations get the lion’s share of attention—& rightfully so, as noncoding & synonymous nucleotide muts—which cause no AA change‚ are mostly inconsequential. But there are many exceptions, including a possible new one I find intriguing. 1/30 I’ll discuss four categories of such “silent” mutations, two of which might be involved in the recent growth of one synonymous mutation.

#1. Kozak sequence changes
#2. Secondary RNA structure
#3. TRS destruction/improvement
#4. TRS creation 2/30
Nov 24, 2024 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
@SolidEvidence There was yet another paper this week describing someone chronically infected, with serious symptoms, but who repeatedly tested negative for everything with nasopharyngeal swabs. On bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), they were Covid-positive. 1/ ijidonline.com/article/S1201-…Image @SolidEvidence BAL is very rarely performed, yet there must be dozens of documented cases now where NP-swab PRC-negative patients who were very ill tested positive by BAL. This has to be way more common than we realize.

If we had a similar GI test, I imagine we'd find something similar. 2/