From the anti-vaxxers @
Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Volume 11, December 2021
'In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaxxed index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaxxed index cases' (25% to 23%)'
Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Volume 11, December 2021
'In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaxxed index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaxxed index cases' (25% to 23%)'
https://twitter.com/GadflyQuebec/status/1463921260585435142
That was transmission. Regarding infection:
'Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status'
'Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status'
They conclude:
'It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.'
Gross negligence is essentially what current vac-sanctified reopening amounts to.
'It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.'
Gross negligence is essentially what current vac-sanctified reopening amounts to.
The vaccines were never designed (and never even promised by Pharma) to reduce infection or transmission. Which we're seeing pretty much everywhere--w/ virtually zero correlation between vax rates & case rates (or even excess death rates in UK).
It was our public-health apparatus that promised you this, to encourage vaccination, until data forced them to focus on symptom mitigation (which vax does seem to help with, again, temporarily) tho with vax health risks (eg, myocarditis) until recently denied by same authorities.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
