Exciting news about Facebook! They removed some annoying restrictions in search. Which problems are solved? Next tweets (1/...)
Till recently, you weren't allowed to list employees from a company or inhabitants of a city. It was mandatory to know their name. The workaround was to search for any letters of the alphabet, abcdefghijklmnopqrtsuvwxyz mimicking a letter in a name (#osint#nerdalert) (2/...)
But suddenly, Facebook removed this restriction. If you want to find people who work for a very small company in a small German town, restrictions will be lifted, if your keyword is the town itself. Let me explain (3/...)
1. Your keyword MUST be the city, as shown here. 2. Click on People 3. Add the city once more, not as keyword but as Location 4. Add the company (4/...)
Most of you, depending on your friend list and location, will get at least one or two people now. (5/....)
For this particular example, it is also possible to search for employer (keyword), but don't forget to click People --> add name of employer once more. Example: facebook.com/search/people?… (6/...)
It was also not allowed to search for residents of a town at random, without knowing a specific name. That has changed as well. We will continue our example of that small German town, Neustadt an der Aisch. All you have to do is enter that town twice, as shown here. (7/..)
Some of you might think I have a solution for a problem that no longer exists, but that's exactly my point :) Some of us in the OsINT community had to fall back to link-editing that is now not needed anymore, at least for now. (8/...)
For those fellow-nerds: you do have to include the name of the city in @sowdust tool! Go to graph.tips and enter the ID of Mark Zuckerberg (4) and Berlin (111175118906315) but do enter BERLIN as keyword again. (9/...)
Now you well get the public photos in Berlin, posted by Zuckberg, and you can combine it with a certain time frame. Here is the link: facebook.com/search/photos/… (10/...)
The former formula is really needed, you can't do that in normal search, as shown below. (11/...)
Other limitations, searching for a specific day, month, or period in Facebook (FB only allows searches for a certain year), are lifted by whopostedwhat.com. (Tnx to @freetechacademy team30, we learned this morning some stuff can be done more easily now) (12/12)
It's also possible to search for profession now, in combination with employer. Some of the results are not that privacy friendly I think, see below. (13/..)
And suddenly you can search for pilot instructors in Berlin again : ) (14/14 ..(?))
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Introducing the first public version of a versatile, still experimental tool for image detection. What can you do with it? It's aimed at reporters, writers and investigators. (1/6) Detectai.Live
Upload a picture and get web links, when found. Nice feature is that it will also detect public faces, something that Google doesn't do that well anymore. We run Google Vision under the hood for this, with Vertrext (2/6)
If the picture could be fake (= ai generated) then you will get after 15 seconds a verdict that helps you to judge it. If we find links, we want you to have a look yourself. If not, it will try to give a verdict in a percentage, and explain why. (3/6)
ChatGPT quietly scrubbed today nearly 50,000 shared conversations from Google's index after our investigation. They thought they'd solved the problem. They were wrong. (1/5)
A new Digital Digging investigation, conducted with @osint77760, has uncovered 110,000 ChatGPT conversations preserved in 's Wayback Machine—a digital time capsule OpenAI can't touch. (2/5)Archive.org
@osint77760 While OpenAI scrambled to de-index conversations from Google, they forgot the internet's most basic rule—nothing truly disappears. had already captured everything. (3/5)Archive.org
New investigation: when I asked chatbots for something behind a paywall, they delivered the complete story—including quotes that should have been impossible to access without paying. This isn't a bug. It's a feature digitaldigging.org/p/how-ai-bots-…
ChatGPT, Perplexity & Grok systematically access subscriber-only content from major publications—often requiring just 2-5 follow-up questions to extract complete articles. Gemini and Claude are less intrusive. (2/5)
Another finding: @Musk's new Grok 4 (SuperGrok) has paywall-busting direct X integration. It systematically mines social media discussions, screenshots, and quoted excerpts that users share from the paywalled content. (3/5)
I decided to use my lunch time to show you how easy it is to make a fake news story in 30 minutes with Veo3 (I didn't try to perfect it). First: the footage. A mayor comes with a crazy idea and people hate it: (1/10) #verification #ai
What's needed to create this fake uproar in 28 minutes? Access to Google's Veo3. The same AI tool Google promotes for 'creative content' can fabricate creative misinformation. 🧵2/10
The 7-second limit creates a huge challenge: how do you maintain continuity? Solution: Split single interviews across multiple clips, use different camera angles of the same 'event,' create matching audio that bridges scenes. 🧵3/10
Volgograd Oil Refinery is bombarded by Ukraine. Actual footage generated by ….. #AI based on just one picture (2) I gave it and the prompt “add explosions” #verification #geolocation #fakenews via It’s not that easy to detect that this is a fake video (1/2)vidu.studio
Sharpness: The lowest sharpness is 4.76, which is a very low value. This suggests some frames may have been smoothed or blurred, possibly as a result of manipulation or Al generation. Natural textures may have been lost in these frames.
Texture Changes: The variation between the highest (597.85) and lowest (166.14) gradient magnitudes indicates some frames have significantly less texture, further supporting the possibility of manipulation.
In this Twitter storm of 30 tweets, I'll unveil how Google's algorithms operate. Just confirmed: the March 2024 #googleleaks of Google's API docs on GitHub & Hexdocs are real. They reveal Google's tactics in market control, search influence, and data handling, raising privacy and ethical concerns. (1/30)
1. An API called NavBoost uses click data to adjust rankings. Popular results get boosted, distorting relevance for anyone who wants to go deeper. #GoogleLeaks #MarketManipulation
2. Google’s scores image aesthetics to influence search results. Visual appeal can outweigh relevance. #GoogleLeaks