Today 4pm candles will be lit to commemorate the #Holomodor of 1932-33, Stalin's enforced starvation of Ukraine. 5m+ died. In 1932, USSR exported 1.73m tonnes of grain, 1.68m in 1933 when reserves were 1.8m tonnes. Human life counts for little when building the Communist utopia.
As Orwell put it - 'there's something wrong with a regime that requires a pyramid of corpses every few years ... All people who are morally sound have known since 1931 that the Russian regime stinks.'
But British pro-Soviet enthusiasts denied anything really serious was going on.
The denials by Sidney & Beatrice 'Stalin is no dictator' Webb, Labour heroes, founders of the LSE & New Statesmen were brazen lies - but they were duped. They passed their text to the Sov. Embassy in London for editing 🤦♂️This page is from my book about to be reprinted #Holomodor
Another e.g. of the idiocy of the British Left then: Aneurin Bevan, another of Labour's great heroes, in 1933, the 2nd year of the famine, insisting that in the 'classless' USSR ppl had more security than in the UK.
Try telling that to the orphaned kid whose parents had just died
Lots more examples from 1917-1953 in my book, reprinting in paperback, out in a few weeks. Copies available from my website shortly.
(Website being rebuilt at the moment but it will be back up soon)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
And how…
So much of my research mirrors this. One influential speech last year to a group of British Caribbean-origin churches in U.K. inflaming them against the CofE was based on so many sheer inventions, I cannot let it pass. 1/
Honestly I’d be the last to defend the CofE on so many grounds but Prof Sir Hilary Beckles, Vice Chancellor of the Uni of West Indies, leader of the Caricom reparations campaign, & an eminent knighted historian, accused the CofE of the following serious charges, all untrue: 2/
1. The CofE “was one of the largest slave owners in Barbados”
- At emancipation there were 83,000 slave on Barbados, just 411 on the estate left to the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel. (Not excusable but context important see no 10 below) 3/
Arthur Koestler on the psychology of conversion. Be it Corbynism, Critical race theory 'antiracism', XR, Nazism or Communism, once the convert has 'seen the light', life takes on meaning. And the fear of losing that deafens the new recruit to all challenges to his new faith.
An intellectually closed word... a universal method of thought ... a cure for all that ails man ... which deprives him of his critical faculties.
You cannot bring a convert back to reality by objective argument. Just five minutes of Twitter proves that.
All doubts and questions are dispelled by the prophet or his lieutenants. Questioning disciples are rebuffed with argument that their thought processes are still contaminated by the world outside. Objective reasoning becomes impossible: truth is now whatever the cult says it is.
Communism wants destroy the traditional family. Its love & mutual loyalty hinders the advance of the socialist collective society. It must redirect that love to the state.
Don’t believe me? Here is Trotsky & another Soviet writer from the 1920s (my thread has more quotes)
Martyn Liadov, rector of the Sverdlov Communist University: “Is it possible to bring up collective man in an individual family? No. The sooner the child is taken from his mother and given over to a public nursery the greater is the guarantee that he will be healthy.” (1925)
Zina Zinovieva, pioneer of Soviet education, wife of leading Bolshevik Grigory Z: “We must rescue children from the harmful influence of family life ... we must nationalise them.
To oblige the mother to give her child to the Soviet state - that is our task”