A quick thread with some of the slides/key messages from my presentation at the launch of The British General Election of 2019, in particular for those unable to see the presentation live due to technical glitches
The context of the election: both parties collapsed in the polls in the wake of Theresa May's repeated failures in the Commons in Spring 2019; frustrated Leave voters defected to Brexit Party, frustrated Remainers to Lib Dems and Greens
The conclusion Conservative MPs and members came to was that of Prince Falconeri in Di Lampedusa's classic "The Leopard" - "If we want things to stay as they are [i.e. Con govt leaving the EU], things will have to change." @briancartoon here illustrates the political maths
The Johnson effect was immediately evident in the polls - he scored 15-20 points higher than May had been on "best PM" (see attached), and Con poll numbers rose steadily as Leave voters returned
Labour also faced a major polling crunch, but a change of ldr was not on the cards - Corbyn's office opposed it, and his opponents had no way to force it . But the Labour problem was also structural - their activists and voters leaned Remain, but the marginals leaned Leave
As a result, Labour resisted pressure from 2018 onwards to focus on a 2nd ref, instead trying to offer a Brexit policy which appealed to both Remainers and Leavers. This compromise approach became problematic, as a narrative of Corbyn ignoring will of supporters took hold
Labour sought to offset a weak Brexit offer by shifting the focus to domestic policy, an approach which worked in 2017. The manifesto of 2019 up the ante further on the radical 2017 proposals, but fragmented comms failed to assuage voters concerned about cost and credibility
The Conservatives sought to learn from the errors of a traumatic 2017 campaign. A "safety first" manifesto offered big spending pledges in vulnerable areas like health, and avoided controversy, so the campaign could focus relentlessly on three words: "Get Brexit Done"
Labour did have some success raising the salience of domestic issues, with health in particular rising up the agenda during the campaign. But Brexit remained the dominant issue...
Labour had less success when it came to leadership. Johnson was not a popular leader in 2019 - his ratings were consistently below Theresa May's in the 2017 campaign - but he faced a much diminished Corbyn, whose ratings were dire throughout.
The campaign was not static - instead both large parties gained ground at similar rates from smaller parties - Cons from Brexit Party, Labour from Lib Dems & Greens. The parallel rises meant no major shift in the state of the contest, with Cons comfortably ahead throughout
The one wild card on election night was the Brexit Party - by splitting the Leave vote in Labour Leave marginals, they may have saved 25 Labour MPs (including figures such as Ed Miliband and Yvette Cooper) and prevented a Johnson landslide majority of 130 plus
A final note of tribute - we were v lucky to have both Sir David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh attend the launch. David co-authored every book in the series from 1951-2005, partnering with Dennis on all elections from 1974-2005. Our team stands on the shoulders of these giants
If this thread has piqued your interest, there is much, much more in the book, which is available now in paperback, hardback and kindle editions: amazon.co.uk/British-Genera…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Decided to go through this systematically. Incumbent government performance in wealthy democracies since March 2022, when Ukraine invasion really spiked things upwards: 🧵
South Korea President (March 22) - incumbent term limited, incumbent party lost
Malta (March 22) - incumbent Labour party re-elected, gains seats
Hungary (April 22) - incumbent Orban govt re-elected with larger majority
Serbia (April 22) - incumbent Pres re-elected but loses Parliamentary majority
France (April/June 22) - incumbent Pres re-elected with reduced share, loses majority in Nat Assembly
Slovenia (Apr 22) - incumbent govt defeated
Australia (May 22) - incumbent right wing govt defeated
Sweden (Sept 22) - incumbent left wing govt defeated
Writing about the London Mayor election last week made me realise how much more interesting the West Midlands Mayoral election is...so now I've done a Swingometer post on the West Midlands (link in next tweet)
There has been a lot of talk, and quite a lot of polling, about Sadiq Khan's fate in London. But Andy Street's fate as Conservative mayor of the West Midlands is more uncertain & more interesting, and yet has attracted much less interest (& no polling)
Street represents 3 million people - he is therefore the Con politician with the largest direct mandate in the country. He's won twice in the W Mids, outperforming his party's national polling both times. But now he's running in a toxic national environment. Can he win?
Some brand new data and analysis on immigration. I put the numbers of migrants coming to Britain via various routes directly to the public and ask them whether they want to cut each group or not. Only two cases where a majority want cuts - ‘small boats’ arrivals & dependents of students
If we look only at those who had said earlier in the survey that they believed migration needed to be reduced, a majority favour cuts in four cases out of ten - two above plus asylum seekers and students in general.
There are therefore six large migration flows which even a majority of those who say migration is too high do not want to see cut: health and social care workers
their dependents
Other skilled workers
Their dependents
Family reunion imms
Ukrainian refugees
New on the Swingometer - "Labour and Muslim voters" - a deep dive into the electoral risks Labour might face from a slump in Muslim support open.substack.com/pub/swingomete…
A poll published this week by Survation showed Labour support among Muslims falling by 26 points - from 86% in 2019 to 60% now. This is a big shift, at a time when Labour support in general is rising. Could it cost the party seats at the general election?
I look at this question from three angles. Firstly, could Labour struggle in seats with largest Muslim electorates? No. All thirty seats with the largest Muslim communities were won by Labour in 2019, and Labour would hold all of them even if the Muslim vote dropped 26 points
Firstly, as many are pointing out, foundation courses are not same thing as standard courses. This is not an apples for apples comparison.
Secondly, if anyone imagines cutting overseas student intakes wld free up spaces for UK students, they don't understand uni finances at all
If the response to this is "cut off overseas students" then in most cases you will then have a university with a massive deficit. They will respond by cutting research and teaching across the board. That means less UK students, and even tougher entry requirements.
Its quite simple really: Universities lose money - lots of money - on British students. As in, thousands of pounds per student. They lose money on research, because govt doesn't fully fund overheads. Overseas students are how they balance the books.
One of the dominant tropes in current political discussion is "voters are fed up with the government, but are they convinced by the opposition?" This isn't new - exactly the same discussion happened in 2009-10 ahead of Cameron's win and in 1996-7 ahead of Blair's win
From Kavanagh and Cowley "The British General Election of 2010": "Despite some improvement in voters' perceptions, voters were still unsure about the Conservative Party's central message...'The Conservatives are no longer the nasty party. But people are not sure what they are.'"
From Butler and Kavanagh "The British General Election of 1997: "[T]here were still doubts that the lead was firm or that the party could win the next general election...was this any more than the usual mid-term dissatisfaction with the government? Would errant Tories return to the party, as the election neared? There was evidence that some converts to Labour might change again..."