The only thing that seems clear from the new variant news - and most of it remains uncertain, tbd - is that we need to be investing massively in vaccine production capacity. Having most of the world unvaxed creates too big a breeding ground for new variants. And that’s setting…
2/ aside entirely the ethical and moral issues involved, which are vast. We need more vaccines produced more quickly. We also need them for ongoing vaccination campaigns. The odds of this new variant dramatically changing vaccine protection seem low. But over time …
3/ it seems basically certain that viral evolution will chip away at vaccine immunity. Updated vaccines can be produced for new variants. That part isn’t that complicated, especially with the mRNA vaccines. But producing 100s of millions and billions of doses and distributing …
4/ them is another story. It does seem like there are few if any scenarios over the coming years where increased vaccine production capacity won’t save tons of lives and keep everyone healthier. The only question is how much it will help.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Earlier this month, Darrell Brooks, the suspect in the Waukesha crowd killings, was arrested for intentionally running over a women in a gas station parking lot after a fight. He posted bail and was released from Milwaukee County Jail on Nov 16th.
2/ The county DA now says the $1,000 bail was "inappropriately low." In the previous two years Brooks had been charged a total of three times with recklessly endangering the safety of others, including the gas station attack. jsonline.com/story/news/cri…
3/ And for clarity: Yes, you're reading that right. Brooks got out on bail a week ago for intentionally running over someone else.
"The hair-on-fire reactions to the announcement of the University of Austin represent the fear within our leadership class of building anything that could jeopardize the status quo." washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
2/ I confess that I really couldn't care less about the "University of Austin". Seriously more the merrier. But most of the reaction I saw was dunking on it not being afraid of it. It mainly seemed like a coming together of professional outrage/victimization hounds.
3/ I can't imagine why anyone would be worried about it or lose any sleep over it.
A few thoughts on this verdict. It’s probably obvious I think it was a bad verdict. But I think we have to look more broadly at the result. People disagree. Juries make bad decisions. There’s nothing new about that. But what we have in the country right now are three factors.
2/ One is highly permissive self defense laws. In some cases the statutes are ok but they’re interpreted too heavily or entirely in the defendants subjective perception of danger. In other stand your ground type cases they’re just bad laws. But the upshot is the similar.
3/You also have a situation where any yahoo is now allowed to bring a high capacity fire arm into an already tense or potentially violent situation. Usually they come with a chip on their shoulder or a political agenda. Then if they get scared they can start shooting.
This is the 30th anniversary catalog of @clcboats. I have no relationship with the company but I’d like to take a moment to sing its praises. Back in 2014 a conversation with my son got me thinking and wondering how hard it would be to build a boat.
2/ Or more specifically I started wondering how hard it would be for a 45 year old man with no experience boat building or woodworking or really building anything. I was about to find out. I starting researching how to do it. And I eventually decided to buy plans - essentially ..
3/ blueprints - from an outfit down in Maryland called @clcboats. They also sell kits where you get all the parts precut. But I decided just to go with plans. It was an amazingly rewarding experience. One thing it did was get me started with woodworking, which has since …
Curious to see the book on which this essay is based. It is right inasmuch as Justice Marshall and others have argued that the Civil War amendments amounted to a refounding of the constitutional order. Something far more than mere amendments. nytimes.com/2021/11/02/opi…
2/ But the arguments about Lincoln, moral, historical and analytical are extremely dubious. Just no other way to put it. There are numerous instances of this. But I'm struck by the first - in which Feldman argues that Lincoln violated the constitution by going to war to ...
3/ preserve the union. The evidence of this is that Lincoln's predecessor, James Buchanan, and his AG, concluded that the US had no authority to stop the seceding states from leaving. Buchanan was a notorious Doughface, a then current word for a Southern ...