A great collaboration on direct RNA sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 transcripts using nanopore sequencing from Camilla Ugolini (Italian Institute of Technology) and colleagues, lead by Tomasso Leonardi (IIT) and Dave Matthews (Bristol) - I am a co-author. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
(note; I and some other authors, eg, @AkesonUCSC have conflict of interests to declare as I am long standing consultant to Oxford Nanopore and shareholder).
Camilla looked at SARS-CoV-2 transcripts using a neat new protocol that both captures capped (full length) RNAs and can sequence through them, NRCseq, developed by @ettwiller (also a co-author). This means Camilla can distinguish full length from degraded transcripts.
The SARS-CoV-2 genome has a fiendishly clever "jumping" behaviour on the production of RNAs for its proteins (the outcome is a bit like splicing, but done via the polymerase). The capped sequences (but not "normal" direct RNA sequence) showed equal 5' to 3' RNA levels
Armed with these complete RNA sequences, Camilla and colleagues could map out more of the potential ORFs, confirming the disputed ORF10 and having a subtype of ORF9 (ORF9d).
Perhaps unsurprisingly there are capped transcripts that don't start where expected - although rare these might be involved in regulation of the virus during its lifecycle.
The expression levels of the transcripts was consistent with northern blots (less common than one might think) and shows an inverse relationship between length and expression, suggesting there is a simple 'jump' probability between discontinuous sections.
As well as this exploration of SARS-CoV-2 biology, this technique shows great promise in helping to isolate capped RNAs from other RNA species in cells.
Great paper by Camilla, and also just shows the complexity of the SARS-CoV-2 (and Cornavirus in general) lifecycle.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My view of COVID from crisp, cold Helsinki (back to London - with PCR test - on Tue). TL;DR Omicron has thrown us back to a place of uncertainity; we have far more potent tools+understanding now but the trajectory will be mainly determined by the biological properties of Omicron
Context: I am expert in human genetics and computational biology. I know experts in viral genomics, infectious epidemiology, clinical trials and immunology. I have some conflicts of interest; I am paid consultant and shareholder of Oxford Nanopore and was on the Ox/Az trial.
Key background: COVID is a virus-triggered disease, with hallmarks of auto-immune disease, triggered by a novel, highly infectious Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. In naive populations many people would get this disease, many of those dieing, and healthcare would be overwhelmed
A brief explainer thread on B.1.1.529, the latest SARS-CoV-2 variant which is throwing up concern after an excellent live streamed press conference from South Africa. TL;DR this variant both has many mutations but most importantly looks like it outcompeting delta in South Africa
Context: I am a expert in human genetics and computational biology; I know experts in viral genomics, infectious epidemiology, clinical trials and immunology. I have some conflicts of interest: I am longstanding consultant to Oxford Nanopore and was on the Ox/Az clincal trail
Background. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is made from RNA (its instruction set) wrapped in proteins. The RNA+proteins of the virus hijack our cells to make more of its RNA and proteins into a virus. This hijacking (infection) causes a response from our immune system.
In my voyages in maths with my daughter series - we've been discussing geometry (seed question - can you prove the (n-2)*180 for the interior angles of an n-sided polygon) and this threw up some interesting things.
First off, a discussion of 180 leading to radians + Pi. Thought experiment - if there was a planet of intelligent otters and they used a different number/angle system, they would no doubt not divide the circle into 360, but the concept of a circle, half circle, would be the same
(you might guess my daughter is a fan of otters. We decided they would likely work in base 7 I think due to their tails being the extra "unsymmetric" digit. Don't ask for more details).
Thoughts on COVID in Europe from a crisp morning in London; we understand this virus, its likely endpoint, but it is hard road to follow. Central/Northern Europe start a 4th nasty wave; South West Europe has vaccinated well, (currently) less of a wave; the UK remains a conundrum
Context: I am an expert in human genetics and computational biology. I know experts in infection biology, viral genomics, clinical trials. I have COIs - I am longstanding consultant to Oxford Nanopore (makes sequencing machines) and was on the Ox/Az trial.
Reminder: Assumming there is no major new SARS-CoV-2 variant, we have the measure of this virus and its horrible disease - it transmits rapidly between humans, causing a nasty, often lethal disease (COVID) in some (older, more overweight) people who are immunlogically naive.
Ethnicity, Ancestry Groups and Biology in humans; some thoughts triggered by @molly_przew threads and the recent Oxford paper on the likely mechanism of action for the COVID risk locus on chr3. TL;DR This is area is complex; racism +discrimination are real; biology is universal.
It's useful to remind yourself what some of these terms mean (or might mean). Ethnicity (also "Race" in US context) is usually defined via self identification - a person is given a number of options to tick, sometimes with hierarchy, and they tick one (or more) option.
Great to see this pre-print on rare-meets-common TYR/ human pigmentation genetics by Vincent Michaud (Bordeaux) and senior author Panagiotis (Panos) Sergouniotis (Manchester) - I am a co-author medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
One key thing is that it is a promoter variant which is associated with albinism and related eye phenotypes, not in fact as non-synonymous variant in LD (one needs to capture rare recombinations, and an example of needing deep phenotype positive ascertainmemt - case collections).
(The Promoter variant is the first SNP TYR c.-301C>T [rs4547091] - and it's LD NS proxy is c.575C>A (p.Ser192Tyr) [rs1042602] - by default, any program/analysis would have probably assigned function to the protein coding change)