Joanna and Chip! Are so perfect! The number of times I listened to this OBC recording — on CD! — long before I truly understand how incredible this all was. 🥺 But, I was learning. And loving it.
I was in high school in Ohio and it was the early ’90s — he has charm for a prince, I guess — and I was just beginning to fall in love with musical theater — a bean can begin an adventure — and Into the Woods was my introduction to Sondheim. It was unlike anything else.
“To be continued!” Anyone else might have been happy to have created what is Act I of Into The Woods. The structure of the show — “Ever After” ending the act — basically tells us as much. But, not Sondheim. The first act was just setting us up for his real lessons.
The most adept, concise explanation of what was just beginning to happen to the media landscape that I’ve ever seen. Remember, this was 1987. This is the Narrator being attacked.
Joanna Gleason’s performance is perfect.
The pure Sondheim, rapid-paced “Your Fault,” followed by the punch of “Last Midnight,” works so well.
“You’re so nice. You’re not good, you’re not bad, you're just nice. I'm not good, I'm not nice, I'm just right. I'm the Witch, you're the world.”
Let me tell you, if you were a closeted gay teen with divorced parents in the early ’90s — hypothetically — “No More” hit really hard. 😔
“Sometimes people leave you
Halfway through the wood
Do not let it grieve you
No one leaves for good
You are not alone
No one is alone.”
Thanks for all that you’ve taught us, Stephen Sondheim. And for all that you’ve left us to learn.
RIP.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court holds that a district court cannot enforce its remedy order providing due process to the 8 people the Trump admin sent out of the U.S. (who are now in Djibouti) in violation of the injunction in the third country removals case, which the Supreme Court later stayed.
The apparent 7-2 vote — with Kagan joining the Republican appointees on the procedural question of the district court's power — is appalling abdication of its role in our constitutional republic.
The short of it is seven justices said Trump can send these 8 people to South Sudan with no process.
Here is the "clarification" order, as well as Kagan's concurrence and Sotomayor's dissent for her and Jackson: supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf…
BREAKING: Supreme Court upholds district court order that the Trump administration "facilitate" the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was improperly sent to El Salvador.
A part of the government's request to vacate the original order is "effectively granted" b/c the deadline passed, SCOTUS holds, but the rest of the order stands. As to the requirement to "effectuate" Abrego Garcia's return, the district court should "clarify" that, w/ deference to executive.
BREAKING: On a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court allows the Education Dep't to halt payment of grants.
A district court issued a TRO blocking the cancelation of the grants in a suit brought by eight states. The appeals court refused a stay pending appeal.
Today, SCOTUS stayed the TRO—blocking payments.
Thomas, Alito and the three Trump appointees formed the five-justice majority who issued the unsigned per curiam opinion.
Roberts wrote nothing but noted he would have denied the application.
Kagan and Jackson wrote dissents. Sotomayor joined Jackson's dissent, which does not hold back:
BREAKING: Chief Judge Boasberg issues a classwide, nationwide temporary restraining order, blocking removal of any noncitizens in U.S. custody who are subject to today's AEA order for the next 14 days.
With planes leaving, he says, "I am required to act immediately."
BREAKING: A federal judge this morning issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration from invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport several Venezuelan nationals with no process.
BREAKING: A federal district court judge in Kentucky vacates the Biden administration's Title IX rule, challenged largely for its transgender protections, a decision with nationwide effect.
The rule had been blocked in over half over the country as a result of several different challenges, but there had been no nationwide ruling — and appeals are pending in several appeals courts.