In anticipation of Rangnick taking over as Manchester United manager for the remainder of the season, I decided to take a deep-dive into his practical managerial qualities. Lots have discussed his philosophy, but few have analysed it in practice. Below, I do just that.
THREAD!
Ralf Rangnick is a flexible coach who adapts his tactics & style of play to the opposition by playing a number of different tactical styles. Upon analysing some of his games in his most recent managerial stint, it's clear that his reputation as a high pressing coach is warranted.
Rangnick's philosophy and wisdom when speaking about football makes a lot of sense, but how does that translate to the practical world? Well, his managerial style matches up with his deep, intellectual analysis of the game. He prepares his team well & analyses the oppo thoroughly
Rangnick sticks to his set philosophy (pressing high and controlling the game with that pressing) before making adaptations to the opposition. For example, against Favre's Dortmund, he adapted his press to match Witsel dropping in between the two CB's when building play.
Rangnick's entire philosophy centres around creating defenders overloads on the byline i.e. using the byline as an extra defender. RBL shift across to match up on the sides here and the angles in which BVB can play at are limited. The byline is closed off & all players are marked
Rangnick's system against Dortmund essentially replicated Klopp's Liverpool in the sense that they pressed in a 3-3 offensive shape with the fullbacks pushing on aggressively to press the play to support the outside midfielders when shifting across too. Again, adaptable.
Ragnick similarly implemented the concept of defensive overloads on the byline against Bayer Leverkusen except in a 5-3-2 shape. Again, the concept remained the same - invite the opposition wide and collapse the play. This is a staple of play we can expect to see at United.
However, some problems did arise within the 5-3-2 block. Often times Ragnick's team attempted to collapse the play on the sides to create that defensive overload on the byline but the wide midfielders were left with too much space to cover after play was circulated.
The wide midfielders having a large amount of ground to cover resulted in Leverkusen's fullbacks having quite a lot of time on the ball. A combination of an incredibly aggressive high line and a player in a deep phase with time on the ball is disastrous. This will be punished.
If someone like Andy Robertson had the ball in that position he would hook the ball in beyond the last line to the willing runner in Mo Salah and Sadio Mané. The block would be completely pulled apart and they'd be free on goal. This is a relatively common theme for Ragnick.
At times, the defensive overloads on the byline are superb. However, on other occasions, the initial line of pressing can be passive when inviting the opposition to pass wide. Against the elite quality in the PL, Ragnick's pressing will need to be more consistently aggressive.
The staple philosophy, implementation and understanding of Ragnick's tactical principles are good, but the lack of aggression from the front line of pressing can see the block become passive and forced back/exploited. Often times they can be too hesitant when waiting for triggers
Alternatively, in possession, from a structural point of view, Ragnick's teams play a variety of different styles varying from the 3-1 build-up within the 5-3-2/diamond or a 2-2 build-up within a standard 4-2-3-1/4-4-2 shape.
Creatively, Ragnick's entire philosophy centres around pressing. The quality of the press determines how good the team are creatively and control-wise. However, because United have top players, they'll have settled possession too, and Ragnick likes fluid combination play.
Within the 4-4-2/4-2-3-1 Ragnick encourages his forward on the right to drift to the closest side to combine with the right back, right central midfielder, and right winger, and the same dynamic is seen on the left hand-side or in other systems (the diamond and 5-3-2).
So, within the 5-3-2 shape, the outside midfielders were required to drift high to combine on the sides. In the below images, play was circulated from the left to the right as the combination play wasn't possible to execute on the left, but it was on the right (overload).
Overall, it's clear that based on elite managers' appreciation of Ragnick, his track record in building clubs, his words, and his tactical ideas on the pitch that he is an elite football mind. However, to succeed in the PL, he might need to increase the aggression of his block.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Not only is Solskjaer a phenomenal man, but he is a top manager who brought Manchester United hope for the first time since Sir Alex left despite competing in the best Premier League ever. As a long-time Ole supporter, it's time for one final discussion of the great man.
THREAD!
United were void of quality when Solskjaer first arrived. He had a plethora of 'names' in attack, but none of which were outstanding at that point in their careers (Alexis/Mata were finished, Lukaku overweight, Martial flattered to deceive, Rashford rarely fit, Lingard poor form)
Behind those underwhelming attackers was a clear lack of quality too. However, Solskjaer led the team from disarray when Mourinho was sacked to a miraculous run of form thanks to his cautious tactical adaptations against the likes of PSG & controlled displays against lesser teams
Leicester are set up man-for-man here & went toe-to-toe with Chelsea for the entirety of each fixture last season and won the FA Cup final w/ the same style. Nobody who is critical of Rodgers is saying anything specific about why Leicester are bad - results-based analysis.
However, now that they're 2-0 down and are getting pulled apart, the narrative is Rodgers' tactics are poor, there's too much space in midfield, etc. No - the tactics are the same from each team. However, the individual performances are not. Tielemans also isn't on the pitch.
On paper, each team are matched up incredibly evenly but one set of players are performing better than the other. As such, when that underperforming team is the team without the ball and continue to press because they need to get back into the game, they get pulled apart.
There's been lots of talk about Mikel Arteta's Arsenal lately, and rightly so because the Spaniard is undertaking a top rebuilding job. However, ahead of their difficult away trip at Anfield, I take a deep dive into the game and why expectations should be tempered.
THREAD.
Liverpool are the best pressing teams in the world & one of Arteta's main priorities has been to ensure Arsenal improve the technical level within their build-up to compete technically w/ the likes of Liverpool but also to stamp their own authority on games. He has achieved that.
The likes of Ramsdale, Ben White, Gabriel, Partey, Tomiyasu and Lokonga have proven to be top acquisitions for Mikel Arteta's rebuild. They all excel technically and profile wise within the role Arteta requires them to perform. However, their biggest test yet comes at Anfield.
With Gerrard's appointment at Villa in mind, I take a deep-dive into his managerial abilities and achievements at Rangers in an effort to predict how he fits in at the club. Regardless of that, the entertainment value in the PL increases tenfold with Stevie G back ✌️
THREAD.
Gerrard is an exciting appointment for Villa but the key to him improving as a coach within his 4-3-3 centres around the aggressiveness of the fullbacks, much like Nuno at Spurs and Klopp at Liverpool. Nuno was sacked due to a lack of aggressiveness, Klopp won a PL/CL due to it.
Gerrard sets his teams up in the same narrow 4-3-3 shape as Klopp at Liverpool and it led to his Rangers team having an invincible season, breaking Celtic's decade long dominance by winning Rangers' first league title in 10 years, and only conceded 13 goals in 38 games!
West Ham are a top team, and going 1-0 down early on against them with a goal that arguably shouldn't have stood makes the game 10x harder considering how the gamestate suits their style (they can be content with sitting back in a deep block & countering because they're winning).
So, for Liverpool to lose to a team who are that awkward to play against within that game state when some decisions didn't go their way is fine. This is the Premier League - there are many top, top teams - West Ham could easily make it to a CL quarter final & be competitive in it
Liverpool did well to sustain pressure and worked some nice angles to get crosses into the box vs West Ham's low block and were typically dangerous in all other phases of play too (counters, second ball situations, transitions, etc, etc). But again, it's a tough game for any team
Mikel Arteta's Arsenal are one of the most exciting teams in world football, and they're due to explode. In the below mega-thread I discuss why Arteta's tactics are conducive to enabling the team to do just that once they mature and blossom from kids into men.
THREAD.
Against Spurs, Arsenal started well pressing wise which enabled them to assert their technical quality on the game which saw them go 2-0 up before scoring a 3rd shortly after. However, in the 2nd half, Spurs had 62% of the ball & forced the passive Arsenal back into a deep block.
The theme continued in the next game against Brighton where Arsenal started well pressing wise because the game was in its most frantic period (the start of the game when everybody is fully fit) before being forced back into a deeper block & having only 42% of the ball overall.