After the death of Igor, Olga assumed power on behalf of their son, Sviatoslav. The Drevlians, sensing weakness, sent a message to Kiev to make Olga aware of Igor’s death and proposed Olga marry Prince Mal, their chieftain. The twenty men of the embassy arrived in Kiev by boat.
The boldness of the Drevlians was met with cunning. Olga assured them that she wished to honor them properly and would have them brought to the palace the next day. She proposed they sit in their boat while Kiev’s residents carried them to her.
The Drevlians, understanding this as a great honor, complied and were carried. When they reached the court the Kievans threw them into a trench they had dug the night before and buried them alive. Olga asked if “the honor [was] to their taste.”
Olga then sent a message to the Drevlians to bring “their distinguished men to her in Kyiv, so that she might go to their Prince with due honor.” Unaware of their embassy’s fate the Drevlians obliged. The Drevlians sent many of their leaders to Kiev unawares.
When the Drevlians arrived at Kiev, Olga had her servants prepare them a bath to wash themselves before presenting themselves in front of her. Grateful, the Drevlians crowded into the bathhouse. Olga had the doors barred and burned down the building with them inside.
Olga then sent another message to the Drevlians to “prepare great quantities of mead in the city where you killed my husband, that I may weep over his grave and hold a funeral feast for him." She arrived with a few companions & wept and feasted. The hesitant Drevlians joined her.
When the Drevlians were drunk she ordered her men to slaughter them, encouraging them in her rage. The Primary Chronicle claims 5,000 Drevlians were killed here.
Olga gathered her army at Kiev and marched Iskorosten, the Drevlian capital. She laid siege to the city for over a year. Unable to take the city, Olga sent a message to the residents asking why they resisted and starved while the other Drevlians surrendered and lived in peace.
The residents of Iskorosten replied that they were willing to pay her tribute but were afraid of her vengeance. Assuring them that the feast satiated her bloodlust, she only asked for 3 pigeons and 3 sparrows from every house in the city.
Elated at the turn of events, the Drevlians complied. Olga then had her men tie sulphur and cloth to the feet of every bird. That night she ordered them to light the cloth and released the birds. The burning birds flew back into the city and lit every building on fire.
As the citizens fled their burning city, Olga ordered her men to slaughter them. The rest were taken as slaves and given to her warriors, only a few remained at Iskorosten and agreed to pay tribute to Olga in the future.
Despite her brutal revenge on the Drevlians, Olga did not wish to rule through violence. Recognizing the grievances of the Slavic tribes, Olga reformed the poliudie (tribute system). Olga appointed her own officials to collect the tribute instead of relying on local chieftains.
This change gave Olga more control of how tribute was collected and may have helped prevent local chiefs from taking higher tribute to take a large cut for themselves. Historian Valentin Yanin suggests this reform is the origins of Rus Law, later codified in the Russkaya Pravda.
After this intense episode, Olga busied herself establishing trading posts, hunting grounds, and towns across her lands. These trading posts, pogosti, were used to centralize local trade and administration. This network of pogosti helped foster a Rus identity and administration.
Olga also established a line of border posts on the fringes of her kingdom. By delineating control and creating a central system of administration the Rus began to coalesce a distinct cultural and ethnic character; mixing Norse and Slavic peoples and traditions.
Olga dodged constant proposals for remarriage. If Olga remarried she risked Sviatoslav’s future and safety, as well as her control of the state.
Olga’s centralizing reforms and steady hand provided the Rus state with a period of relative peace, stability, and prosperity. However, within these reforms she separated her personal property from that of the state.
This would ironically lead to a decentralization of the Rus centuries later as powerful Kniaz (dukes) used this separation to wrest power away from Kiev, a key factor for Rus decline.
Despite this, Olga’s rule was generally positive for the Rus and her reforms provided the Rus state with the mechanisms necessary for greater exertion. Her son, Sviatoslav, will harness this power and explode onto the world stage in a series of lightning campaigns.
Another key part of Olga’s reign was her conversion to Christianity and patronage of Eastern Orthodoxy. Saint Olga’s Christian character and support for the church made serious inroads for the Christianization of the Rus, completed by her grandson Vladimir.
Our next thread will example Saint Olga’s conversion and influence on the development of Rus Christianization and the paradoxical pagan revanchism of her son Sviatoslav and grandson Vladimir in his early reign.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Saint-Emperor Nikephoros Phokas dedicated his life to defeating the Muslim Emirates that for centuries had attacked Byzantium.
His success was so complete that the military manual he penned with his brother Leo, the Praecepta Militaria, begins with an apology:
“[The treatise might not offer] much application in the eastern regions at the present time. For Christ, our true God, has greatly cut back the power and strength of the offspring of Ishmael and has repelled their onslaughts…
Nonetheless, in order that time, which leads us to forget what we once knew, might not completely blot out this useful knowledge, we think we ought to commit it to writing…
Today, 570 years ago, Ottoman Janissaries poured over the Theodosian Walls.
The Genoese fled when their leader, Giovanni Giustiniani, was injured. The Emperor threw himself into the hopeless struggle & died with his men.
After over 2,000 years, the Roman Empire was no more.
The final siege of Constantinople is the last chapter in the swan song of the Late Byzantine Empire & a dramatic tale of betrayal, duty, determination, honor, and horror.
In 1449, Emperor John VIII died & his brother Constantine XI took the throne. Crowned in a small ceremony in Mystras, Constantine was never coronated by the Patriarch in Constantinople thanks to his support for a Union with the Papacy, an unpopular movement in Byzantium.
The fact that the Byzantines basically forgot they ruled Sardinia will always be funny to me.
After the Muslim conquest of Sicily, Sardinia was isolated from the rest of the empire. The Byzantines had more pressing matters & through negligence, Sardinia slowly gained a measure of de facto independence.
The Sardinians repelled frequent raids from Sicily & Africa by Muslim pirates. Such attacks forced them to abandon many of the old ports and cities of the coast, further isolating them from the rest of the Byzantines by making the life-line of communication by sailing weaker.
During the reign of Constantine VII, a raiding party from Tarsus attacked the sleepy village of Herakleos.
The villagers were celebrating Divine Liturgy when they received the grave news.
The village priest, Themel, decided to act. That decision would change his life forever.
As Themel prepared the Holy Mystery a messager burst into the church to announce that Muslim raiders had been spotted marching toward the village.
Themel stopped the liturgy and stormed out of the church at the head of his flock, wearing his priestly vestments and armed with a semantron, a big wooden or iron board to hit as a sort of bell.
If you’ve read Ibrahim you’ll know he isn’t a historian; he’s a polemicist. He uses primary sources to weave a narrative of constant, civilizational conflict between Islam & Christianity.
There is no scrutiny of sources or historiography, these are broad strokes to get the scene set for another chapter in a 1,400 year cage match.
If you are looking for Treadgold or Kaldellis here you won’t find him. Ibrahim understands that the Byzantines after Basil II struggled to adapt to new threats, yet is uninterested in the complex political, social, and material causes.
The Byzantine army was the most multi-ethic force in the pre-modern world.
Mongols, Turks, Africans (Zanj), Saxons, Norse, Rus, Normans, Huns, Alans, Cumans, Pechenegs, Germans, Italians, Georgians, Armenians, Iranians, Albanians, Catalans, and more.
How did they manage it?
Many came as mercenary warrior bands looking for employment. These were enrolled within the military and given regular pay & orders under the watchful eye of Byzantine officers.
This prevented mercenaries from becoming a nuisance & the Byzantines to use them expertly in battle.
Some of these mercenaries settled down with local women, eventually fading into the general population except for the preservation of their surnames and connections to their regiments.