Thread by @ljin18

DAOs (decentralized autonomous organizations) represent the next step forward in the labor movement.

A thread 🧵

Some history: the labor movement grew out of the Industrial Revolution, when workers organized together to fight for their common interest and negotiate with employers for better working conditions & pay.

The legacy of the labor movement is all around us. Among other things, it brought us: minimum wage, abolition of child labor, equal pay for equal work, fair employment, family leave, etc.

These rights didn’t just happen spontaneously—they were fought for by organized workers.

Over the past few decades, union membership has declined precipitously, from 36% of US private-sector workers in the mid-20th century to 6% in 2019. Lots of reasons contributed to the decline, including employer resistance to unions & less government support.

In tandem, productivity growth vs. workers’ pay has diverged, with productivity growing at 62% since 1979, while hourly compensation has only grown by 17.5%.

Translation: most productivity gains are going to capital, while workers are not sharing in this economic growth.

Despite the wins of unions, they have not been without controversy:

Until the Civil Rights movement, many unions systematically excluded workers of color. Some have been plagued with corruption and embezzlement of union funds by leaders, distorting their intended purpose.

And some critics point out that as unions became centralized bureaucracies in their own right, they often settled for too little—over the objections of their own members.

So how can we harness the power of collective action moving forward to ensure labor’s voice is represented, while minimizing the centralized structures that can lead to a perversion of values?

New developments in decentralized coordination hold promise for a renewed pro-labor movement. DAOs—internet communities with shared ownership—can function akin to unions, representing the collective interest of their members to drive beneficial policies & mechanisms.

Take for example @YieldGuild, a gaming guild comprised of thousands of play-to-earn gamers.

An onramp that brings more players into play-to-earn gaming, it can represent gamers & lobby game devs for better policies.

Its scale also enables the collective to offer benefits and protections (e.g. healthcare, paid time off) that would be infeasible if gamers were operating on their own.

DAOs like @KlimaDAO can be viewed as experiments in macro collective action: individuals who share an interest in combating climate change are able to harness their power to raise prices of carbon offsets—forcing companies and countries to respond faster to climate change.

Versus unions, transparency of DAOs’ governance and on-chain flows of capital lessens risk of embezzlement and corruption, since there is visibility into how funds are flowing into & out of the treasury. And open rules for member admission mitigate institutional discrimination.

This blog by @MyPaoG, @JulzRoze, and @zkchun outlines how collusion is harder in a decentralized organization:

"Since not every participant shares the same goal, colluding to make the outcome of the system favor specific participants is difficult"

orca.mirror.xyz/WVB26-PtNp8D_7…

Another element driving worker power in decentralized orgs is the increased ability of contributors to freely exit & port their skills and attention elsewhere, boosting labor’s leverage.

If gaming scholars can easily be onboarded to new games or a protocol’s community can fork it and start anew, that creates greater incentives among developers to act in community-friendly ways.

Importantly, DAOs themselves represent an unlock in structurally prioritizing the interests of stakeholders, by virtue of being *owned* by its members.

Many believe that DAOs will grow to become larger than the biggest co's bc of alignment among members w/ the network’s growth.

Of course, DAOs will face their own set of challenges around scaling, governance, and balancing the interests of capital providers vs. active contributors.

But they represent a compelling new paradigm for stakeholder primacy that can favor workers—especially pressing as a K-shaped recovery continues to widen economic inequality.

Thank you to @gabusch @_erikforman @JulzRoze @patel0phone @arampell for conversations that inspired this!