NFT collections would do well to learn from Legos (the toy bricks) 🧱
Here’s why:
Legos have network effects:
1. Each new user who buys them & each new collection purchased ADDS value to existing owners, because they’re all interoperable and composable.
Importantly, the network effects and added utility are even true without additional users:
Even single player mode gets more valuable as you buy more products / have more combinations.
We often talk about NFTs as 'media legos,' but today the network effects of NFT collections mainly takes the form of community & prices going up, rather than of actual utility and functionality increasing as new users join in.
2. New generations of Lego players often get bootstrapped via hand-me-downs, making it easier to be inducted into the community.
This serves as a customer acquisition channel, leading them to purchase more (again, back to the network effects).
3. There are different price tiers of Legos, so price discrimination can happen among superfans vs. casual fans, but importantly there are low barriers to entry for newcomers.
Today, the most prestigious NFT collections are inaccessible to new users as a result of their success.
This is me in 2019 writing about the network effects of Legos:
Last year, I founded Atelier to invest in the passion economy: new platforms that enable users to monetize individuality.
The mission has been crystal clear since day one: to create paths for economic mobility at scale by lowering the barriers to entrepreneurship.
The passion economy is the clear “what” that we are driving towards, but there is a next chapter of the thesis.
Crypto and the ownership economy—software that is built, operated, and owned by users & participants—presents a “how” for fully realizing the passion economy mission.
Like feudalism and divine right monarchy before it, the creator economy is experiencing a legitimacy crisis.
Creators are questioning the terms that govern their relationship with the platforms they utilize—and the right of the platforms to set those terms in the first place.
How the ecosystem responds—what alternatives are proposed, who builds them, and how—will shape the next phase of the Creator Economy.
I want to share the story of how the first analyst I ever hired @AtelierVentures was someone I never expected—an 18-year-old recent high school graduate: @LilaShroff
Last fall, I was still in the thick of fundraising, but looking for help with community building, content, and research for my first fund.
Lila had been connected through @peytonkleinpgh, another recent high school graduate whom I had recently chatted with.
After meeting Lila, I was immediately struck by two things: her age and the fact that her resume, just after graduating high school, was somehow more impressive than mine had been when I was 25.
Gig workers and content creators are now reckoning with the fact that their livelihoods depend on the actions of platforms that they have little ability to sway, and to which are locked in given lack of data ownership and portability.
As a result, a new form of labor activism is appearing in the platform economy, which we call decentralized collective action or DCA.
DCA aims to achieve many of the same goals as historical labor movements: better pay and working environments, protection from harassment, etc.
Today, it seems inconceivable that for much of human history, people accepted the 'divine right' of monarchs as a legitimate source of power.
Years from now, we may look back on this era and wonder why we were accepting of autocratic companies led by 'enlightened dictators.'
For much of human history, people lived under authoritarian/monarchical forms of government.
In the late 17th century, republican forms of government arose, inspired by conceptions of natural rights developed during the Enlightenment. >50% of the world now lives in a democracy.
The American and French Revolutions were major contributors to the growth of representative governments.
The Springtime of Nations in 1848 was a revolutionary wave affecting 50 countries in Europe, wherein people demanded more participation in government, economic rights, etc.
Income inequality in the US is the highest of all the G7 nations. The wealth gap between the richest and poorer families more than doubled from 1989 to 2016.
How do we change the fundamental dynamic driving wealth inequality?
In a world in which returns to capital outpace returns to labor, we need to give everyone access to owning capital assets that appreciate in value, not just short-term income.
(i.e., those who earn from work can never catch up to those who grow their wealth from investments)
A oft-cited stat is that 55% of US households own stock.
What is lesser-known is that that ownership is very concentrated: the top 10% wealthiest American households own 84% of all stocks. The top 1% of households own 50% of all stocks.