Someone paid $650,000 for a virtual mega-yacht. I repeat: the yacht does not exist beyond a virtual world called “The Sandbox.”

Every time I see a story like this I not only think we need to rein this in, but also that taxing the rich isn’t enough; we need expropriation.
Oh, that’s not even the extent of it. If you want a preview of what the metaverse will look like, this is it:

Virtual property markets defined by artificial scarcity that are already highly financialized and producing multi-million virtual real estate deals.
If you want to know more about why the metaverse sucks, you can’t go wrong with this episode of my podcast 👇
The future envisioned by the metaverse capitalists is so dystopian: democracy is based on ownership of land or currency, the currency fluctuates wildly in value, virtual “land” prices are already soaring, and renting that land is seen as a big opportunity. euronews.com/next/2021/11/2…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paris Marx

Paris Marx Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @parismarx

28 Nov
I love when venture capitalists claim their scam tech solutions are actually designed to help workers.

DAOs, like blockchain, are a solution in search of a problem they can be applied to and so its backers are constantly making pitches for how it can transform new areas of life.
The thread is funny because it gives a very brief overview of labor history, the decline of union membership (and responsibility of state policy and capital’s power), then some union criticisms before the solution: technology that ignores the politics but is vaguely empowering.
Yet we recently saw a concrete example of how the rhetoric around DAOs doesn’t reflect how it works in the real world with ConstitutionDAO, particularly that claims to escape centralization are a myth. vice.com/en/article/qjb…
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
Net neutrality is important, but it’s hardly the difference between Facebook “dominating” the internet or not; a reality you can see by looking at jurisdictions where net neutrality is in force. vice.com/en/article/epx…
Facebook and other major tech companies control a lot of the underlying infrastructure of the internet, from undersea cables to cloud storage. They also benefit from network effects and other forms of structural power that will continue to ensure their dominance.
I have to say, I’m getting really tired of these hyperbolic statements about tech policy that distort public understanding. Net neutrality will stop “domination,” Section 230 is the only thing that allows us to post online, crypto regulation is unprecedented “surveillance.”
Read 4 tweets
17 Nov
we’re doomed
Friedman’s argument is that governments can’t solve problems and instead we need to rely on the market and brilliant entrepreneurs like Elon Musk to save us. He constantly downplays the state’s role (on vaccines this time) and places his faith in tech and the market.
This isn’t new. If you go back to “Revenge of the Electric Car” in 2011, he says of EVs, “I do not believe this is a problem that is gonna be resolved by regulators and bureaucrats. This is a problem that’s gonna be solved by engineers, innovators, and entrepreneurs.” Bullshit.
Read 6 tweets
14 Nov
People who advocate for NFTs, crypto, and web3 because they believe it holds the possibility of a decentralized web tend to ignore that technology alone isn’t going to change the path of tech’s development toward commercialization and concentration.
That argument is little more than an extension of the techno-determinism that formed a key part of the Californian Ideology and misidentified how change occurs by downplaying the importance of politics in favor of technology and the market.
Until you challenge the political economy that shapes tech’s development, it’s going to be difficult to have any notable alternative that diverges from the path that serves capital. That’s why the response needs to be political, not just technological.
Read 4 tweets
27 Sep
This thread about Web 3 is a load of naive bullshit, but this is the key point.

Web 3 will not decentralize the web as its adherents say. Web 2.0 centralized the web to extract profit from it; Web 3 is about commercializing more digital activities to do the same.
Web 3 is not about empowering creators, builders, or any of the nice PR speak being deployed. It’s about making a way to monetize more of what happens online for the benefit of new and existing internet companies that will seek to monopolize these new markets.
I wrote a bit about Web 3 this piece for @_reallifemag back in July.

“Web3 is a technological solution that does not contend with how power is distributed in the real world.” reallifemag.com/reconnected/
Read 4 tweets
2 Mar
I’m rereading Hubert Horan’s “Can Uber Ever Deliver?” series in its entirety, and it’s just so good. Absolutely nails the problems with Uber’s business model and why the arguments it makes (that media often repeats uncritically) are complete lies.
“Uber not only lacks the major cost advantage [over incumbents] … but actually has higher costs than traditional car service operators in every category, except for fuel and fees where no operator can achieve a cost advantage.” nakedcapitalism.com/2016/12/can-ub…
“Highlighting the app also implies that Uber is a ‘technology company’ that has completely ‘disrupted’ industry economics, and is not simply a traditional company like Domino’s Pizza that is utilizing smartphone ordering.” nakedcapitalism.com/2016/12/can-ub…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(