I’m rereading Hubert Horan’s “Can Uber Ever Deliver?” series in its entirety, and it’s just so good. Absolutely nails the problems with Uber’s business model and why the arguments it makes (that media often repeats uncritically) are complete lies.
“Uber not only lacks the major cost advantage [over incumbents] … but actually has higher costs than traditional car service operators in every category, except for fuel and fees where no operator can achieve a cost advantage.” nakedcapitalism.com/2016/12/can-ub…
“Highlighting the app also implies that Uber is a ‘technology company’ that has completely ‘disrupted’ industry economics, and is not simply a traditional company like Domino’s Pizza that is utilizing smartphone ordering.” nakedcapitalism.com/2016/12/can-ub…
“A key issue here is that ‘tech’ has morphed from one element of a larger business toolkit into a quasi-ideological/religious ‘movement’ based on inherent virtues that the ‘non-tech’ world lacks.” nakedcapitalism.com/2017/01/can-ub…
When criticizing media responses to his economic criticisms of Uber, Horan posts this comment by Tom Slee that outlines how Uber’s argument evolved over six years, none of them ever bearing out.

nakedcapitalism.com/2017/01/can-ub…
Libertarian think tanks “conducted a major taxi deregulation campaign in the 1990s advocating the same complete elimination of all forms of legal/regulatory restrictions … that Uber is seeking, & laid out a detailed communication program that Uber copied” nakedcapitalism.com/2017/03/can-ub…
“If one takes Uber’s judgements at face value, one could conclude that Uber’s only profitable activity is getting paid off for discontinuing staggering unprofitable markets.”

China, Russia, & SE Asia “incurred significant expense but had almost no revenue”nakedcapitalism.com/2019/04/hubert…
“All of the new businesses Uber has expanded into (food delivery, scooters) appear to have even worse profit margins … and their sole purpose appears to be to boost revenue growth rates, and mislead naïve investors that Uber has Amazon-like potential” nakedcapitalism.com/2019/09/hubert…
“Uber’s financial releases and Dara Khosrowshahi’s public statements have come to almost exclusively emphasize EBITDA measures. The problem is that none of these honestly measure EBITDA, and Uber aggressively misrepresents EBITDA as ‘profit’.” nakedcapitalism.com/2020/02/hubert…
“Q2 Uber revenue in its ‘Eats/delivery’ business doubled but the economics of these services were always substantially worse than Uber’s hopeless car service business. … Q2 ‘Eats/delivery’ had an ‘adjusted EBITDA’ 25 margin points worse than car services” nakedcapitalism.com/2020/08/hubert…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paris Marx ☭

Paris Marx ☭ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @parismarx

24 Jan
Oxford University was going to open source its vaccine, then the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation stepped in and convinced them to sell exclusive rights to AstraZeneca.

Now AstraZeneca is failing to deliver and poor countries are struggling to access vaccines. ImageImageImageImage
It’s important to remember that Gates has used his foundation to launder his reputation, but there are a lot of serious questions about its activities, including supporting strong IP rights for drugs that make them less accessible to poor countries. thenation.com/article/societ…
You can read the full article about Oxford reversing course and selling its vaccine’s rights to AstraZeneca (at the encouragement of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) here: khn.org/news/rather-th…
Read 7 tweets
22 Jan
I like Wolff, but I disagree with this comparison. Electoral systems in the countries he’s referring to are way different and make it possible for there to be more than two parties.

In the US, elections are undemocratically controlled by Dems & GOP to ensure that doesn’t happen.
That isn’t to say I think US left politics needs to take place within the Democratic Party, or that it’s a good vehicle to realize left-wing demands. But I don’t think the example of European left parties carries over to the US, especially federally.
There are way more roadblocks to any kind of third-party strategy in the US than there are in European democracies, and that limits the possibility of success when taking that route. US left needs to find an effective way to exert its power, but I’m not sure third party is it.
Read 4 tweets
15 Sep 20
okay so, the social dilemma on netflix:

the film is populated with a bunch of former high-ranking tech employees and executives (for the most part) who have seemingly seen the light: their tech tools are destroying the world.

except there’s a massive problem with their framing.
the technological determinism of silicon valley, that now pervades neoliberal society, always presents technology as the primary actor: fb and google are brainwashing us, manipulating us, destroying democracy, dividing us, etc.

this is technodeterministic liberal propaganda.
these people once believed that technology was changing the world; they still do, but now it’s for ill instead of good.

and obviously it must be technology — because what else could be causing these massively negative social outcomes but technology?

(hm, i wonder...)
Read 17 tweets
28 May 20
I’ve cited the “British Digital Cooperative” report in a several articles and recommended it to a number of people, so it was great to finally speak with its author, @danhind, and get some more insight on how he imagines a cooperative future for technology.
I think one of the key things is how hard it can be to imagine an alternative to what exists right now — whether it’s in terms of political organization, the structure of economic sectors, or how technology would work under a different set of material conditions.
That’s one of the most valuable aspects of Dan’s report: tech can be developed in a very different way, it can encourage & enable different functions (and figuring those out will take collaborative work), and it can help enable more democratic political & economic structures.
Read 5 tweets
10 Dec 19
This is the problem with the EV narrative. It assumes they’re clean and green just because you don’t pump their tanks full of gas.

They are better than gas and diesel vehicles, but they still have a massive impact as mining operations expand to supply minerals for batteries.
.@triofrancos has done a lot of great work specifically on lithium mining in South America, and how greater demand is fueling more mines that cause damage to local environments and communities.

Her latest is worth a read: logicmag.io/nature/what-gr…
I also wrote about the bigger picture, citing an @Earthworks report on how the demand for these metals will grow exponentially, the damage mines are already causing in the Global South, and how it will also get worse. link.medium.com/pD1T5DWIj2
Read 4 tweets
1 Dec 19
I want to highly recommend “A Planet to Win” by @KateAronoff, @alybatt, @aldatweets, & @triofranco.

It’s a quick, approachable read that will expand your concept of what we can collectively achieve and how it would make life so much better.

Thread of some of my favorite parts:
Obama could have done so much more. The proposals were there, and he wouldn’t fight for them.

When Fox targeted Solyndra, no one noted how Tesla got billions from the same program.

(“A Planet to Win,” @VersoBooks)
When people say the rapid timelines for a Green New Deal aren’t possible, think back to the New Deal.

They build so much during that period!

(“A Planet to Win,” @VersoBooks)
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!