This is a thread about cash bail. A number of prosecutors, police, and media pundits are blaming "bail reform" for specific crimes, like the recent tragedy in Wisconsin. Here's the truth about cash bail.
First, have you ever seen a bail hearing? Watch this video to see what we're talking about. Does this barbaric assembly line bureaucracy look like safety to you?
Second, only the U.S. and the Philippines allow for-profit cash bail. The rest of the world thinks it is grotesque and irrational to allow private corporations to profit by determining who is caged and who is free with their families based on how much cash they have.
Third, there are 400,000 human beings in cages as you read this tweet solely because their families do not have enough cash to buy their release. They would be home with their children, in school, at work, getting the medical care they needed, etc. if they had money.
Fourth, the scientific evidence is that cash bail makes communities *less safe* by increasing instability, lost jobs, lost housing, separating kids, interrupting medical/mental health care, traumatizing people in jail, etc. People who say otherwise doing equiv. of climate denial.
Fifth, you should understand the stakes. Here are a few individual people's stories from our casework @CivRightsCorps that are representative and that you should take a moment to absorb:
Sixth, we see 1000s of stories like these in our cases every year. And the scientific evidence is that each year a person spends in jail/prison *takes two years from their life.* We cage so many people that it *lowers overall U.S. life expectancy.*
Seventh, our civil rights case @CivRightsCorps in Harris County (Houston) featured in the above video, has resulted in the release of 15,000-20,000 human beings every year charged with minor offenses in that single county alone.
Eighth, despite overwhelming public health evidence and international experience for ending these cash bail practices, a small group of vocal cops, prosecutors, and reporters has embarked on a campaign of false fearmongering about "bail reform." @FWDusfwd.us/news/new-york-…
A couple facts to know about bail fearmongering: since almost nowhere in the U.S. has done meaningful bail reform, the people blaming "bail reform" for bad outcomes (in Wisconsin, for example) have no idea what they are talking about. Ask them questions like, which reform, when?
Also, in the few places that have done bail reform like (DC; NY, NJ) the overwhelming evidence is that caging far fewer people for lacking cash improves safety. Here's the most rigorous study of the data from Houston, the third largest jurisdiction in US:
The stakes of ending cash bail and caging fewer human beings prior to trial are enormous. We are talking about millions of years of life lost; millions of preventable beatings, infections, traumas; millions of children not separated from parents. Learn about this issue.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: Yesterday, the New York Times published a headline it knew was false. The implications of this are dangerous for everyone who cares about an informed public. Here’s what happened:
The NYT wrote another pro-police propaganda piece that had all of the usual problems I’ve discussed before (more on that below). But the editors chose to add a headline that stated that “murders ‘doubled overnight’” in the Bronx, New York. Here’s where it gets devious.
Notice that NYT editors chose to put the “doubled overnight” in quotes. Why? It's a signal they aren’t reporting it as a verified fact, but as a quote from a source. In the article body, we learn they are quoting a former cop turned local professor. Here it gets more devious.
This is a thread about how journalists decide what is “news” and what isn’t. Anyone shaping the news and anyone consuming the news should understand who decides what counts as news, how they decide it, and what determines what they say about it. Here, I ask a few questions:
This thread is inspired by the gap in what mainstream media treats as urgent and what are the greatest threats to human safety, well-being, and survival.
For example, air pollution kills *10 million people* each year and causes untold additional illness and suffering. It rarely features in daily news stories. Why?
This journalist is so conditioned to mindlessly quote prosecutors that he misses a huge story (the decades-long divestment from healthcare and investment in useless jails/prisons) to blame a preventable death on not requiring slightly more cash bail from a mentally ill man.
The person tweeting this hasn’t thought deeply about cash bail (which all available evidence shows *increases crime*) or about the empirical literature on the effectiveness of short stints in jail at preventing future crime.
Cash bail separates millions of poor families every year and hurts public safety. Journalists like this do a massive disservice when they parrot DA talking points without looking into any of the actual evidence or without putting the bigger picture in perspective.
THREAD: The reaction of this reporter reflects a common flaw in media coverage of the punishment bureaucracy: proposals to shrink and end human caging are framed as unthinkable folly, while the radical historical aberrations of the status quo are ignored. A few key thoughts:
In conversations with people, it's vital to start with how unprecedented current U.S. human caging is: 5 times U.S. historical average from 1790-1970, 5-10 times other current countries, almost all poor people, and a rate of caging Black people 6 times South Africa in Apartheid.
Many journalists never do this. They don't tell people how unprecedented and how lacking in evidence the current system of mass human caging is. Instead, proposals for change are subjected to (sometimes cartoonish) skepticism that reporters haven't brought to the stauts quo.
THREAD. Journalists should be more interested in the gap between what police talk about and what they do. Almost all police media statements are about "violent crime." But almost none (4%) of police time is spent on "violent crime." Why is this important?
First, we must recognize that police propaganda in the media is effective. Most people in the U.S. have no idea that 96% of all police time is spent on things even the police call "nonviolent," because the media doesn't report on that other stuff much.
Second, we should be skeptical of people who don't talk about most of what they do! Why don't police talk about the bulk of their time/money: trespassing, drug possession, suspended licenses for debts, civil forfeiture seizures, evictions, mental health calls, shoplifting, etc..?
Huge NEWS: Today the New York Times reported on a lawsuit, initially filed in secret, alleging a coordinated effort by NY officials to silence people attempting to expose pervasive corruption by prosecutors. It's a fascinating case for a few reasons: nytimes.com/2021/11/10/nyr…
The federal lawsuit alleges that the case had to be filed in secret because New York officials, including Queens DA and Corporation Counsel for the City of New York, threatened a group of law professors that **publicly talking about their prosecutor grievances was illegal.**
The lawsuit alleges that these New York "law enforcement" officials then violated the First Amendment again by threatening the professors that even **telling the public about the threats made against them** by the City's lawyers and Queens DA would be illegal.