If you read the article you see Schiff was talking specifically about the January 2 call in Georgia.
A grand jury has been convened and the Georga prosecutor said she's working on it.
See: nytimes.com/2021/11/06/us/…
You all read past the headlines, right?
A grand jury has been convened and the Georga prosecutor said she's working on it.
See: nytimes.com/2021/11/06/us/…
You all read past the headlines, right?
https://twitter.com/Mickeleh/status/1465438965834543106
The first paragraph says Schiff is "concerned."
The last paragraph fact-checks Schiff.
Very large and influential accounts had meltdowns over the headline: See NOTHING is happening!!!!!
What am I going to do with all of you?
*I'm wagging my finger like a schoolmarm.*
The last paragraph fact-checks Schiff.
Very large and influential accounts had meltdowns over the headline: See NOTHING is happening!!!!!
What am I going to do with all of you?
*I'm wagging my finger like a schoolmarm.*
I am putting each one of you into the corner and taking away points for not reading past headlines.
Now you'll all have to earn extra credit to make up for it.
Now you'll all have to earn extra credit to make up for it.
https://twitter.com/Retrievers5/status/1465441869475860483
If you're interested analysis of that phone call and what the prosecutors have to prove to get a conviction, I recorded this video:
…
Yes, his guilt can be proven, but it's not as straightforward as people think.
There's a transcript on my blog.
…
Yes, his guilt can be proven, but it's not as straightforward as people think.
There's a transcript on my blog.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
