Doing something with math or engineering was drilled into me from a young age. This was before "STEM" became the word of the day.

In college, all majors had to take intro to computer science. I found I had an aptitude for it. Not much more to it than that.
Like a lot of people, I didn't have a "passion". I always wanted to be a writer of some kind. But it takes a lot of work to create a career from that. And I was honestly too lazy. Didn't have that kind of initiative. I was hoping for a good job that paid well.
I didn't know anything about computers until my senior year in high school. But the more I poked around with one, it struck me as something that required a lot of skills and education. And where I come from, that means more money. So it seemed like a reasonable career bet.
I started majoring in computer engineering. Which starts out teaching you about hardware and circuitry. I was pretty bored by all of that. (I'm not a very good student).

But the compsci class was cool. It struck a chord with me pretty early as something I could stick with.
My second year, I switched majors to computer science. The rest of my college career was spent trying to dodge other pre-requisites so I could take more major courses. Don't do that btw. My entire last year was nothing but pre-reqs. Brutal.
Technically it was all majors within the school of engineering. Which at Georgia Institute of Technology means almost all majors.
Computer Science 1101 was the course they used to weed out the stragglers. It was 150 freshmen per class. And they did that thing where they told you to look to your left and your right. One out of 3 people wouldn't make it through the course.
They weren't kidding either. People were dropping like flies. When I say I had an aptitude, I mean it was hard but I was able to figure it out. For a lot of people, it never clicked. I believe CompSci at Georgia Tech was a huge barrier for people trying to get into STEM fields.
I didn't understand it that way at that age obviously. When you're young, you just accept how institutions work because you don't know any better. But Georgia Tech was incredibly elitist and exclusionary in hindsight. By the time I left that school I hated it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marco Rogers

Marco Rogers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @polotek

10 Nov
This is true, but also not sufficient. The thing to understand is the hype train has a purpose. It serves to attract money and resources to the cause. So that the work happens to turn web3 into whatever people need it to be.
The hype isn't about the current blockchain tech. People will flood this space and build things on and around the blockchain. Idealists who believe in all the promises of decentralization. That's what technologists do. And it'll all be taken advantage of by the scammers.
Technology idealists have always been exploited in this way. And as far as I can tell, most of them don't really mind.

It's not just them though. Our space is increasingly flooded with opportunists why don't give a shit about whether the tech is "good".
Read 6 tweets
5 Nov
I still believe the single greatest failure we will look back on from this pandemic is we have not helped the public truly understand how many people have died.
The way people are behaving makes it very clear that they have not connected with the amount of death that is surrounding us. This is something that motivates Americans. When we tell a story about how Americans are dying, it usually galvanizes people. We didn’t do that.
I believe a big factor that we haven't acknowledged is that people die and their family do not attribute it to covid. There may be lots of good reasons for that. But I think some part of it is shame. Overall, this has been an extremely private pandemic.
Read 5 tweets
1 Nov
I get it. But this is backwards. Most drug crimes are non-violent. And the argument has always been that drugs should not be criminalized to the extent they are. Prosecuting sedition is not about deterrence. It's about making sure people know it's considered wrong.
First of all, I do believe that prosecuting a lot of white people who are participating in this attempted coup would have an effect. White people seeking political power and trying to preserve white supremacy are not the same as people with a drug addiction.
Second. We know there is a huge element of culture and in-grouping at play among Republicans. A lot of people are responding to this because that's what their community is telling them they have to do. If they start seeing people go to jail, that might disrupt the group think.
Read 5 tweets
28 Oct
It's easy to make fun of Facebook's name change. But I think it is going to have the intended effect. They are going from having a highly recognizable and unique name to a generic and forgettable one. It will absolutely help them shed the bad brand around the old name.
This also prepares them for the future inevitability of Facebook the product fading into obsolescence. They can see that on the horizon. As long as the company name is the same as the flagship product, the company's fortunes decline along with that product.
All I'm saying is this is a very smart strategy and I think some people are missing it. I have to revise my prediction. Facebook the product will be gone or obsolete. But Zuck is already planning to replace it with another addictive chaos machine.
Read 13 tweets
28 Oct
Companies were shitty before the pandemic and they’ll be shitty after the pandemic. But they can’t fix a pandemic. I really didn’t think people would have such a hard time with that truth. I also said “we created a society where work is all there is”. People still walked into it.
People said “leadership should do a better job!” I said cool, you know that means we need better people need to agree to be leaders. Y’all said “no that job sucks, I don’t know why anybody would do it”. Hence leadership is populated by sociopaths.
I said “okay well maybe we can work together to make the leadership job less sucky for people”. Y’all said “lol, no. Fuck bosses!”
Read 6 tweets
27 Oct
This may be a controversial take. But I don't think people are supposed to be looking to their job for help with this. What we've been through the last two years is not something a company was built to handle. It's just that we've created a society where work is all there is.
I got some important questions about this, and I think it’s worth working a little harder to set context. Burnout is a thing. It was a thing before the pandemic. And I think we are all coming to understand more of the ways that work is the primary driver of burnout.
But my suggestion that employers can’t fix what we’re currently going through is firmly rooted in the pandemic environment we’ve been in for the past 2 years. I’m saying that I believe pandemic burnout is a specific thing that has greatly exacerbated many of these problems.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(