This may be a controversial take. But I don't think people are supposed to be looking to their job for help with this. What we've been through the last two years is not something a company was built to handle. It's just that we've created a society where work is all there is.
I got some important questions about this, and I think it’s worth working a little harder to set context. Burnout is a thing. It was a thing before the pandemic. And I think we are all coming to understand more of the ways that work is the primary driver of burnout.
But my suggestion that employers can’t fix what we’re currently going through is firmly rooted in the pandemic environment we’ve been in for the past 2 years. I’m saying that I believe pandemic burnout is a specific thing that has greatly exacerbated many of these problems.
We were doing a pretty good job creating a real conversation about burnout. Many companies now acknowledge the problem and are taking real steps to address it. Of course there are many companies that don’t. But it’s possible to work at a company that takes burnout seriously.
But I do think we have to understand when the problem we’re facing has gone beyond that conversation. When I have to send my daughter to school unvaccinated, that’s not something my company can do anything about. When I haven’t seen my loved ones in 2 years, they can’t fix that.
There are so many things weighing on us right now. And that is coupled with the fact that restrictions on public life mean it’s so much harder to do the things that usually replenish our energy. There are so many more factors contributing this burnout than work.
There are things an employer might do to make things a bit easier on people. And they should. But if you find that you don’t get better, and you blame your employer for not doing more, you still haven’t accepted the scope of what’s happening. That’s just not what this is.
I talked at length about my battle with burnout. And it started before the pandemic. This thread may be helpful to some people. And I hope it shows that I’m coming at this as somebody who’s been through it. That’s part of why I feel equipped to speak on it.
It's easy to make fun of Facebook's name change. But I think it is going to have the intended effect. They are going from having a highly recognizable and unique name to a generic and forgettable one. It will absolutely help them shed the bad brand around the old name.
This also prepares them for the future inevitability of Facebook the product fading into obsolescence. They can see that on the horizon. As long as the company name is the same as the flagship product, the company's fortunes decline along with that product.
All I'm saying is this is a very smart strategy and I think some people are missing it. I have to revise my prediction. Facebook the product will be gone or obsolete. But Zuck is already planning to replace it with another addictive chaos machine.
Companies were shitty before the pandemic and they’ll be shitty after the pandemic. But they can’t fix a pandemic. I really didn’t think people would have such a hard time with that truth. I also said “we created a society where work is all there is”. People still walked into it.
People said “leadership should do a better job!” I said cool, you know that means we need better people need to agree to be leaders. Y’all said “no that job sucks, I don’t know why anybody would do it”. Hence leadership is populated by sociopaths.
I said “okay well maybe we can work together to make the leadership job less sucky for people”. Y’all said “lol, no. Fuck bosses!”
I'm going to answer this question. It's going to require context. As in not all situations and companies fit this mold. It's also going to require throwing away some deeply held assumptions.
The core context is knowledge work. That's the only context I'm speaking in because that's what I do. When people talk about "tech work" that is a subset of knowledge work. So you can assume most of what I'm talking about applies to tech jobs.
Most of the time, we have this simple notion of how work gets done. If each individual does their one part, then eventually the whole thing will be done. You can do your part without being too worried about whether other people are doing their part.
Being a middle manager feels a lot like making $400K in the "how much money makes you rich" conversation. A bunch of people who have never experienced it telling you how it works and telling you that you have no problems to complain about. It's wild.
My wife and I have worked hard to be comfortable with being more transparent when it comes to sharing our journey. We will be as real as we can be.
It will not be recorded though. Why? Cause y'all don't know how to act.
I want the conversation to have some focus though. Things can tend to meander all over the place and be less helpful. So let's crowdsource some questions. What is it that people want to hear about?
I do understand that it feels bad to hear about other people making so much more money than you do. When we talk about rampant inequality, it has so many impacts on our society. It's not just about doing math. The resentment is real and understandable.
And if you try to put people up on game, they're not listening. Instead they wanna talk about how your math doesn't add up in their head so you must be lying to them. People on the outside can't even help themselves because they're incapable of trust.
Let me say something that should be obvious. The fact that I'm "rich" doesn't mean I'm gonna be okay with you treating me like shit just because you're not rich. It's more likely that I'll say "no thanks", and you'll remain both angry and uninformed.