Integrating development plans with purgatives to detoxify and formalise the Indian economy reflected the Modi government’s long term vision. But neither could have been possible without the other. And, both would have been impossible without bold leadership.
Nothing would have been possible had Modi not won absolute majority for the second time. Forbes was wrong in faulting democracy. As the dynasty-led Congress declined, Indian democracy was in distress for a quarter century.
Narration of what an absolute majority rule with bold leadership could do cannot be complete without saying how India handled the Covid challenge.
Modi’s greatest challenge came within months of winning the 2019 elections. The mysterious Covid-19 hit India. With no textbook model to counter it, Modi had to innovate, experiment with risky, unorthodox, unpopular ways to stop it, but failed.
That disturbed the people, crashed the economy, inviting the Opposition to go ballistic. Seeing a golden chance to cow him down and India, China began spilling blood on the borders.
Facing the worst challenge from within and outside, which was exploited every minute by the Opposition, he focussed on his Indradhanush Mission to produce Made in India vaccines for Indians. In the past, foreign made vaccines took as long as 17 to 60 years to reach India.
Had we depended on foreign-made Covid vaccines, we would have become bankrupt paying for it, never ever think of relief from Covid. Millions would have died. Modi doggedly rooted for Made in India vaccines, Opposition cast doubts on its efficacy, causing vaccine hesitancy.
India, one of the earliest, now the largest, producers of Covid vaccines, has vaccinated the greatest number of people fully and partially. India has confronted Covid better than the best of the world. If Indian economy is looking up today, credit goes to Made in India vaccine.
This is where post-2014 India stands Imagine a rickety, compromising coalition in its place with some proxy prime minister. Where would India have been with the Covid devastation from within and China firing at the border? This is the difference between India of 1989-2014 & after

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with S Gurumurthy

S Gurumurthy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sgurumurthy

30 Nov
Had parallel black trade continued as before DM, GST mop-up could have failed miserably. That could have threatened states’ finances and the federal structure itself, even caused financial emergency. SBIs latest Ecowrap researches have brought out the truth about unpopular DM.
SBI Ecowrap says because of DM, Jan Dhan bank accounts rose by 5.7 cr; digital transitions from 182 per 10K in 2014 to 13,615 in 2020 — by 135 times; ATM network growth, that indicated cash drawls, has flattened; the savings in the Jan Dhan accounts has risen to Rs 1.40 lakh cr.
SBI Ecowrap says DM, GST, digital transactions reduced share of the informal economy from 54% in 2014 to 15-20% in 2020-21. Formalisation extended to 36 lakh jobs, says the Employee Provident Fund office, to 5.7 cr unorganised workers —most in backward states, says E-Shram portal
Read 5 tweets
30 Nov
Asking an identical question, “Why China flew, India just grew?” Forbes magazine (2019) answered that it was because of the barrier-free autocracy in China and nightmare democracy in India. Is this correct. Read on....newindianexpress.com/opinions/colum…
Yangtze Dam flooded 13 cities, 140 towns, 1,350 villages displaced 1.2 million people. Built in 12 years. Narmada Dam flooded no city. Inundated no town. Impacted far less villages, just 178. Displaced less than 1/10 of the people the Chinese dam had. But took 48 years to build!
Why, then, wouldn’t China fly over just growing India, asked Forbes. But the magazine missed the wood for the trees. For 25 years (1989-2014) India had only rickety, compromising coalitions, which had debilitated the economy. This is what Forbes sadly missed.
Read 24 tweets
7 Nov
The real test is not the % of vegetarians vs non vegetarians. It is the percapita meat consumption. India's at 4.5 kg is amongst the lowest. bbc.com/news/health-47…. It has come down as compared to 1961. It is over 100kg in US.
In India vegetarian vs non vegetarian distinction is based on whether some one eats only vegetarian food or one eats some non veg also. Non veg is not the staple food. It is a side dish. Even non vegetarians don't eat non veg all days. Some days they also remain vegetarian
On religious occasions, sacred days even non vegetarians don't eat non veg. So non vegetarians in India is not like non vegetarians in the west.
Read 4 tweets
15 Jan
In Thuglak annual meet yesterday I had said when in 1987 Indian Express was questioned on taking Chandraswamy's help to probe Rajiv Gandhi's corruption Arun Shourie had said to fight fire one can't look to only Gangajal, can also throw Sewer water zeenews.india.com/tamil/tamil-na…
In the Thuglak meet I cited the Chandraswamy incident when a question was put to me whether the BJP would ally with Amma DMK and Azhagiri to fight the DMK. I didn't know what the BJP would do. But Thuglak had decided to tell the readers they should support ADMK-BJP alliance.
If finally something like what the reader had said happens Thuglak can't say now that the ADMK-BJP has taken those people we regarded as sewer we can't support then. It was to hedge against an unknown situation that I cited the Chandraswamy simili
Read 7 tweets
8 Jan
Tamil people must congratulate Foreign Miniater Jayshankar for his forthright statement on the Srilankan Tamils issue. He said "It is in Sri Lanka’s own interest that the expectations of Tamil people for equality, justice, peace and dignity within a united Sri Lanka are fulfilled
Jayshankar was emphatic what he said applies equally to the commitments made by the Sri Lankan Government on meaningful devolution, including the 13th Amendment to the Constitution. The progress and prosperity of Sri Lanka will surely be advanced as a consequence
The 13th constitution amendment of Srilanka was the outcome of Rajiv Gandhi Jayawaedhane accord of 1987 which created provincial autonomy, and made Tamil as national link language of Srilanka. The UPA Govt never spoke about 13th constitution amendment ever
Read 4 tweets
15 Nov 20
Surappa Anna University VC, a man of impeccable integrity and an equally good academic, is being persecuted by TN Govt as he refused to give degrees to students with arrears. Thousands of students with 20-35 arrears who never clear the would have got degrees.
Surappa decision to refuse degrees to students with arrears was upheld by the UGC, SC and HC of Madras. This was a huge slap on the TN Govt. Now the Govt is taking revenge on Surappa for his action in protecting the academic standards of Anna University.
All academics, media and those interested in basic standards in education should stand by Surappa and raise their voice even as all ignorant and agenda based political parties have converged against Surappa
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(