Yesterday I gave a speech at @instituteforgov setting out Labour's plans to clean up politics - tougher rules and proper enforcement of the rules by an independent body that is not controlled by the Prime Minister.

You can read it in full here.. (1/17)

labour.org.uk/press/angela-r…
The truth is that the current system only works when there is respect for the rules and there are consequences for breaking them.

Because of Boris Johnson there is no respect for the rules and no consequences for breaking them. That is why we need to change the system. (2/17)
Corruption is happening in plain sight and it is rife right through this government. But the rules are only as good as the mechanisms that are there to enforce them.

Our democracy cannot hinge on gentlemen’s agreements - it needs independent and robust protection. (3/17)
Why do rules and standards matter? Because the people who are picking up the bill for this corrupt govt are the taxpayers whose money Ministers are wasting and abusing.

That is why we will replace the broken system and the alphabet soup of toothless committees & advisers. (4/17)
Labour’s Independent Integrity and Ethics Commission will set tougher rules. We will ensure tougher enforcement of those rules by a body independent of political control & we will protect taxpayers’ money against the abuse and corruption we have seen from this government. (5/17)
Take the Independent Adviser on Ministers' Interests.

That role is not independent - an investigation can only happen if the Prime Minister says so.

And the 'advice' is ignored - just like when the Home Secretary broke the Ministerial Code and faced no sanctions at all. (6/17)
In no other walk of life would the person under investigation be judge, jury and in charge of the person investigating.

And my complaints are answered with explanations that the Prime Minister decided that there shouldn’t be an investigation, so the case is closed... (7/17)
The new independent commission will have the power to open investigations into Ministers’ conduct without the approval of the PM, and set clear, binding sanctions for breaches of the Code so the Prime Minister is no longer judge and jury over the conduct of Ministers. (8/17)
We also need to overhaul the rules that apply to former Ministers after they leave office.

There can be no stronger evidence that the rules are broken than the case of David Cameron and his dodgy mate Lex Greensill. If the former PM can text everyone in his phonebook.. (9/17)
to help his dodgy mate Lex Greensill access taxpayers’ money, help himself to a $200m bonus and then rely on a defence that everything he did was within the rules..

Then it's clear that the rules themselves are broken and so is the system that is supposed to uphold them. (10/17)
Forget the revolving door, we currently have a system where the door is held wide open for former Ministers who want to line their pockets as soon as they leave office.

The system is pointless because the rules are too weak and there is no enforcement of them. (11/17)
The Committee can’t even enforce its own rulings or take action when the rules are broken.

When the Committee said that the former Chancellor Philip Hammond broke lobbying rules the government agreed, but then said they wouldn't be taking any action to enforce them. (12/17)
So Labour will ban former Ministers from lobbying for at least 5 years after they leave office.

No ifs, no buts. No letters after a role has already been accepted and no exceptions. A total ban. And consequences – including financial sanctions – if the rules are broken. (13/17)
We will stop former Ministers profiting from contacts and information gained whilst they were serving in public office and we will close this revolving door for good.

Public servants should serve the public without one eye on a cushy lobbying gig as soon as they leave. (14/17)
The changes that I set out yesterday will overhaul the broken system that has failed to stop the spread of corruption under this PM.

And we will put the Independent Commission on a statutory footing enshrined in legislation to rebuild the regime that is not working. (15/17)
Never again will a Prime Minister and his Ministers be able to break the rules with impunity because the rules are too weak, they aren’t enforced and it is the Prime Minister himself in charge of them.

We will stamp out Conservative corruption. (16/17)

theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
Under a Labour government the rules will be strengthened, enforcement will be toughened up and power and control over the rules will be taken away from those the rules hold to account.

It will be a Labour government that cleans up our politics. (17/17)

labour.org.uk/press/angela-r…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angela Rayner

Angela Rayner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AngelaRayner

27 Nov
Thread: @Ed_Miliband and I have written to the government's Independent Adviser on Ministers' Interests and the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards regarding a Minister (@annietrev) appearing to mislead Parliament about the links between Aquind and Conservative Ministers.
Aquind have been lobbying Ministers to give the green light to a £1.2 bn electric interconnector project which is fierely opposed by the local community - and even the local Conservative MP.

Anne-Martie Trevelyan herself has received £2,500 from Aquind.

portsmouth.co.uk/news/politics/…
In total Aquind and Director Alexander Temerko have donated over £1.3 million to the Conservative Party, Conservative Ministers and MP.

The former Business Secretary @AlokSharma_RDG even sat down for dinner with Temerko at a £12,000 Tory Party fundraiser.
mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
Read 8 tweets
25 Nov
Thread: Ministers have launched another cover up of corruption.

Today @SteveBarclay refused to publish meeting minutes and correspondence related to £3.5bn Covid contracts awarded without tender to Conservative Party donors and companies linked to Conservative Ministers (1/5)
.. And could not even say whether the missing (if they ever existed in the first place!) minutes from the Randox/Owen Paterson/Lord Bethell meetings had been found or will be published. The almost £600m given to Randox is just the tip of the Conservative corruption iceberg. (2/5)
The government must publish all the emails, WhatsApps, messages, correspondence and meeting minutes between government Ministers, special advisers, MPs and the companies linked to Conservative Ministers and the Conservative Party that were awarded £3.5 billion of contracts. (3/5)
Read 5 tweets
22 Nov
Last week Ministers admitted that they have no minutes or records from meetings between government Ministers and Randox - the company that paid Owen Paterson to lobby for them and was awarded £600m in contracts.

I have demanded an investigation into these secret meetings. (1/7)
On Wednesday when Labour forced a vote to make the government publish the minutes of the meetings between Ministers & Randox a government Minister told Parliament that they don't have the minutes. They either never existed or have been deleted/lost. (2/7)
If Ministers don't have the minutes to a specific meeting involving a Minister and a company that was awarded £600 million of contracts then logically there could have been many more meetings that have taken place in secret with companies that have been awarded contracts. (3/7)
Read 7 tweets
16 Nov
Let me tell you a story about @michaelgove.

Today it has been revealed that Michael Gove referred his close personal friend, personal donor and beauty company owner David Meller to the government’s fast-track VIP lane, helping him get a £50m contract.
politico.eu/article/conser…
As Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster & Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove was in charge of the government’s procurement policy. In that role, @michaelgove was responsible for ensuring that all contracts are awarded “based on value for money.. achieved through competition”.
So can @michaelgove explain why he referred David Meller to the VIP fast-track and helped him get a £50m contract?

Is it anything to do with the fact that Mr Meller personally donated £3,000 to Michael Gove, and helped run Gove's leadership campaign in 2016? What a coincidence!
Read 11 tweets
23 Sep
Yesterday at #PMQs @DominicRaab tried to patronise and talk down to me. I've done a bit more research on the 115 room mansion, Chevening, that he is fighting over...

1. There is no mention of Chevening on the Charity Commission website so it does not appear to be a charity
2. Chevening has received taxpayers' money whilst the Conservatives have been in office.

3. The estate is exempt from paying taxes, so the taxpayer does in fact subsidise and therefore fund the estate.

4. The Chevening Estate Act says that the trust is not a charity.
5. But more importantly, why is @DominicRaab trying to justify the fact that he is more concerned with fighting over access to a 115 room mansion than he is with millions of families who are going to have to choose between eating and heating? He's so out of touch it hurts.
Read 4 tweets
30 Jun
Thread: @MichaelGove was too chicken to come to Parliament yesterday to answer questions on the Public First contract (the case where the government acted unlawfully by awarding a contract to his friends. So I’ve written to him with some questions. (1/10)
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
In this case the judge made a ruling of “apparent bias”, which is clearly a breach of the Ministerial Code. @michaelgove must now be investigated for breaching the Ministerial Code in this case. (2/10

But there is much more going on here. A separate court case ruled that @michaelgove’s department had also attempted to mislead a court about the Cabinet Office’s FOI ‘Clearing House’, and @michaelgove misled Parliament about this in December 2020. (3/10)

Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(