China's WTO Ambassador Li Chenggang published an op-ed on the 20th anniversary of China's accession to the WTO in the People's Daily yesterday.
Titled "Playing a colorful movement on the WTO stage", it confirmed several of my observations over the years: paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2021…
1. The overall assessment, as noted by Amb. Li at the beginning of the essay, is that China has grown from a "rule-taker" to a "rule-maker". This is an observation I first made 11 years ago in a paper with the same title, available on @SSRN: ssrn.com/abstract=19417….
More specifically, the essay notes that China is the "main force" of rules negotiation, "Top Students" in Policy Review, and the "night watchman" of the dispute settlement mechanism, which were all explored in my 2010 paper.
2. The essay also notes that "China has grown from a user of public goods to an important provider on the WTO stage", supported by examples such as the China Programme for LDC accession, as well as China's "leading role in WTO reform". Yes, you read it right, China is now saying
that it plays a leading role in WTO reform negotiations, as I pointed out in another recent paper:
Henry Gao, China’s Changing Perspective on the WTO: From Aspiration, Assimilation to Alienation. Available at SSRN: ssrn.com/abstract=39585…
such a claim also confirms the broader point in my paper above that China now sees itself as the affirmer of WTO rules and reform negotiations.
3. In summary, Amb Li notes, "Over the past 20 years, China has kept its promises and acted positively, and has played a constructive role in promoting the development of the WTO." In support, he refers to the "overwhelming praise of China by most WTO Members in the recent TPR",
Yet, the story as reported in @fbermingham's live reporting of the TPR seems to indicate otherwise, which is summarized in the discussion on China's "alienation" from WTO rules and the reactions that followed in my paper.
4. Li's essay is capped with an upbeat note:
China will continue to play colorful music on the WTO stage, and to promote WTO reform in line with the needs of the overall interests of 164 Members, so that the large garden of the WTO will be "red and purple in every way".
While people may debate whether China is the one playing "colorful music" or "discordant notes", let me finish off this thread, as I did in my paper, with a thought from 3 years ago in this op-ed in the @east_asia_forum: eastasiaforum.org/2018/03/09/bro…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thanks for alerting me to this @pstAsiatech. Interesting essay, but I disagree with both the diagnosis and the prescription by Matt Pottinger and David Feith: 1. It is true that China is tightening the control on data, but that doesn't necessarily mean that its first priority is
this "strategy of global data mercantilism". Instead, as I've stated repeatedly, the control of data is mainly done to ensure "cyber security", as "there is no national security without cyber security", as famously stated by Xi.
Why would you kill your goose if all you want are the golden eggs? The goose got killed because its honks are too noisy, and the owner values peace and order first, with little regard to golden eggs
The National Social Science Fund of China just issued its list of major award projects. Not surprisingly, many of the projects are on the study of XJP thoughts or new era theories. What I found most interesting, however, are 2 super-secretive projects with redacted project titles
The first is #27, a project by Liu Wanghong from Nanjing. He seems to have been working on Geographic Information Security Laws and Regulations. Does this mean that another law on Geographic Information Security is in the making? This seems to be confirmed by the recent Didi case
The other with a missing title is #173, which is by Xin Qiang from Fudan, who specializes in Taiwan policy issues.
Let me guess the title: The Constitutional Framework for the Governance of Taiwan after Reunification?
Interesting new essays from @ChairmanRabbit explaining the logic of the "new era", with this one explaining the rationale behind China's "supply-side structural reform", which is very different from the "supply-side economics" championed by Trump. mp.weixin.qq.com/s/-7IZBGNd8Hm9…
China's "supply-side structural reform", instead, focuses on the production side, i.e., getting rid of those that are outdated, unneeded by the market, not internationally competitive, & wasting resources, etc, as @ChairmanRabbit wrote.
But that's exactly the problem.
Who's to decide which industries are outdated, unneeded by the market, not internationally competitive, & wasting resources? According to the "supply-side structural reform" which @ChairmanRabbit supports, it would be by the government and the bureaucrats, not by the market.
New crackdown on online streamers?
CCTV News reported today two cases of tax evasion by two Chinese online streamers, who were respectively fined 65 & 27 mil RMB.
The cases are interesting for 3 reasons:
1. They were caught by the tax authorities using "tax big data analysis" by the Hangzhou tax bureau. I guess that's one reason why big data is getting so important in China.
2. Their alleged wrongdoings were converting what they earned in the streaming business from personal income to the business income of the sole proprietorship. I'm not a tax expert, but if I remember correctly this is a widespread practice among China's celebrities and
Chinese Ambassador Qin Gang to the US gave a speech at the Dialogue with the Brookings Institution Board of Trustees earlier this week. Here are a few interesting passages: china-embassy.org/eng/zmgxss/202…
1. "The US says that its China policy is for defending the “rules-based international order” and ensuring the implementation of “rules of the road”. But what are the rules? Who made these rules? Who are the traffic police? The US has not made itself clear on these questions."
These questions pretty much summed up China's problems with the so-called “rules-based international order”, which I've been tweeting on since March.
Why are ships in Chinese waters disappearing from tracking systems like AIS recently? This story from @Reuters explains a lot, except that it's not due to the PIPL as mentioned in the story.
Off the grid: Chinese data law adds to global shipping disruption reuters.com/world/china/of…
AIS tracks the movement of ships, thus does not cover personal info as under the PIPL. Instead, the applicable law is more likely to be the Data Security Law, which entered into force on Sept 1st, or 1 month before the Chinese ships started to mysteriously disappear in AIS.
As I tweeted 5 months ago, the DSL added a new category called "core data”, which includes those on national security, which could potentially include data on the movements of ships (including warships).