There has been more focus on whether the public trusts institutions (governments, medicine, public health orgs) than on how those institutions could better earn our trust. 1/
Western leaders have expressed confidence even when they were completely wrong, and have been unwilling to express uncertainty, even when it would have been more honest 2/
We've seen politicians upgrade parliament to have excellent air ventilation, as school children & essential workers are forced into poorly ventilated buildings with insufficient mitigations #COVIDisAirborne 3/
Some leaders lied about the efficacy of masks rather than admit there was a shortage. Which of course backfired when they later needed to ask everyone to wear masks. 4/
A lot of advice has been patronizing: the general public was told we aren't smart enough to learn how to wear masks properly, and that we won't wash our hands AND wear masks (as though we can only keep 1 idea in mind at a time) 5/
People distrust the institutions that don't trust them (@karlitaliliana referring to the disbelief & dismissal with which many doctors treat suffering patients) 6/
Often, it is suggested that the public is stopping the government from acting, rather than the other way around (below poll from the UK, but this media/govt dynamic applies to many countries) 9/
We've had absurd policies (you can gather with friends in a restaurant but not your own home), harmful ones (closing beaches & parks, even though outdoor air is typically safer), & misleading ones (hand-washing over mask-wearing) 10/
Again and again, leaders have made false promises that vaccines alone are sufficient to end the pandemic, even as country after country shows that is not the case. 11/
We've watched some doctors feed anti-vaxxer doubts, at scale, downplaying the risks of covid in children 12/
And other doctors have received a national platform to portray patients as dogmatic & anti-science, even as those same doctors mislead audiences about the well-documented multi-system organ damage that is part of LongCovid 13/
On *reviewability* of automated decision making (ADM), rather than *explainability*
Reviewability does not necessarily involve explanations. It is about exposing the decision-making process, including human processes, structures, & systems around a model
Explanations focused on how a model has arrived at an output may miss much of what is important. A more holistic view could include information on testing & auditing procedures, training data, effects of decisions on protected characteristics, & more. 2/ @jennifercobbe
Judicial review of public sector decision-making does not simply assess the decision itself, but the decision-making process as a whole
An understanding of human decision-making as a process that begins before the decision and that has consequences that resonate afterwards 3/
Flaws of countering disinfo w/ appeal to authority:
"Worrying about whether we trust institutions without asking if these institutions deserve trust... A program of infantalization – trust that the adults know what is right – will provoke equally infantile resistance." @Aelkus
Failure of legacy institutions to respond appropriately to the pandemic, from March 2020 @aelkus, h/t @RSButner
A society that cares more about declining trust in institutions than what institutions have done to deserve trust – and which devotes far more effort towards managing the behavioral psychology of risk than actually reducing risk – is engaged in narrative-making above all else.
Compared to ethics principles in medicine, AI ethics principles lack: 1. common aims & fiduciary duties 2. professional history & norms 3. proven methods to translate principles into practice 4. robust legal & professional accountability mechanisms
"The truly difficult part of ethics—actually translating theories, concepts & values into good practices AI practitioners can adopt—is kicked down the road like the proverbial can." @b_mittelstadt 2/
"Ethics has a cost. AI is often developed behind closed doors without public representation... It cannot be assumed that value-conscious frameworks will be meaningfully implemented in commercial processes that value efficiency, speed and profit." 3/
Australia's competition regulator found:
- Google engages in anti-competitive behavior in digital advertising, which harms consumers & businesses accc.gov.au/media-release/…
Many people have a false dichotomy that you are either FOR or AGAINST covid restrictions, with no nuance about the TYPE of restrictions or level of effectiveness, much less that eschewing all restrictions → hospitals collapse & lockdown more likely. 1/
There has been a lot of terrible public health messaging & contradictory government policies in the West, from the start of the pandemic, continuing now, and these erode public trust, create false expectations, & contribute to “pandemic fatigue” 2/
The “only elderly & chronically ill are at risk” was both false AND ineffective messaging. This has been clear from the VERY START of the pandemic. (I RTed @jenbrea at the time) 3/