GP Lots of lefties screaming, "You're not pro-life because you're pro-death penalty and you're not for government giving away trillions to people who don't deserve or even need it!"
Lemme 'splain your disconnect.
GP Abortion in the Catholic tradition as well as in many/most Christian traditions (and other faiths) is always wrong because it is the unjustified taking of a purely innocent human life.
Always. Wrong.
GP The death penalty in the Catholic faith (and others) is licit but strongly disfavored. It is permitted in a few narrow circumstances.
The death penalty involves, when properly applied, the *justified* taking of a human life, one which has been adjudged guilty.
GP The "give errybody all teh munneez evar" charge is equally hot garbage.
Our faith commands *us* to go help other people. We are not permitted to outsource this charge to government. We are commanded to do these works for the good of other *and* ourselves.
GP So maybe rethink your arguments. It's not like we don't have good faith, logical, longstanding arguments in favor of our pro-life stance on abortion as well as our (often varying) stances on the death penalty and government-run social welfare programs.
GP We may be wrong on some of these positions. We may not always live up to our ideals.
But claiming we can't be against abortion without toeing the Democrats' line on all other issues is a steaming hot pile of weak shit-filled tea.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
GP The Democrats and media have adopted a few (bullshit, IMO) talking points cheering abortion after yesterday's SCOTUS abortion arguments.
They go something like this:
1. Stare decisis must govern!
2. SCOTUS overturning Roe would be pure politics!
1/n
3. SCOTUS didn't even consider Roe and its progeny's viability and undue burden standards as it must!
4. Trump's appointees to SCOTUS are all illegitimate and must recuse!
There are more, but these seem to be where the Democrats and media are settling.
2/n
Dealing with each in order, I state as follows:
1. As Alito (I think) basically said in arguments, "Stare decisis does not require us to keep a shitty decision no matter what the reliance interests are on it." Stare decisis is a guidepost, not a requirement.
3/n
GP This is the old NY-28 district which one of the most powerful Democratic women in Congress, Louise Slaughter, held from 1987 until she croaked in office.
GP The risk to unvaccinated people is 3x greater to get hospitalized, 5x for ICU admission, and 7x for intubation based on my county which has a major-ish city in it.
Take that as you will.*
*The risk to the unvaccinated is still fairly low.
GP My mother in law's post-Thanksgiving turkey soup (made from the turkey bones) tastes like sadness liquified in a solvent of failure.
It's so danged bland.
GP My SIL and Mrs. P *finally* told my MIL her soup sucked ass this Thanksgiving. Admittedly, they said it more politely than I just did.
So that left making the soup to me because MIL was not amused by the stunning rebuke.
GP I dutifully made the broth Sunday and the soup yesterday. Added tons of carrots, celery, onions, garlic, a few cardamom pods for that floral flavor, loads of turkey, tons of thin egg noodles.
CZ If you tax people only for successful investments, but don't allow them to refund or credit bad investments, you are punishing people for making good investments.
Which means they won't do it. The housing market will tank, the stock market will plunge as people cash out.
CZ People will minimize 401(k) contributions. In other words, millions of Americans will liquidate to avoid paying unrealized gains for fear of losing anything they make.
This then puts billions of dollars in cash in people's homes, not banks (another meager form of investment).