I am tempted just to say I work with data visualizations and leave out the accessibility part. It makes a lot of folks think this is some extra topic or feature, like voronoi diagrams or storytelling.
But everyone should be doing accessibility work. It is part of visualization.
It's part of the job! Everyone should make their charts, graphs, figures, interactives, and interfaces accessible.
Scientists, designers, engineers, analysts: this should be on all your minds!
The bad news: you can only make something as accessible as your tools and environments allow.
So a lot of the responsibility falls to tools like Tableau (who rely heavily on community-provided accessibility) or journals like @ieeevis/@ieee_tvcg that still use inaccessible pdfs.
A technical intervention is helpful sometimes, but if the technical solutions we already use don't work, it's time for a social intervention: advocating for change from within these spaces.
The impact will be much greater if they can enact change with their existing communities.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I would love to know what other folks think about this!
I'd argue that science isn't really about being the "best" either.
If anyone gets close to whatever "best" is, it's probably whoever synthesizes standards and research in collaboration with people with disabilities to make something specific that is usable and accessible.
Is there a place where I can look up each WCAG criteria and then any research studies that influenced its creation?
There are plenty of studies *on* WCAG. But what research studies (if any) were used to *inform* WCAG?
One of the tricky things when trying to tell researchers they should make their stuff accessible according to the same standards adopted by international law is they will sometimes ask if those international standards were research-backed.
This is especially important when writing papers and mentioning accessibility standards: I want to make assertions and the way we build trust in our claims is through citations to research.
Citations to WCAG are sometimes met with "this isn't empirical."
Why is it that virtually every leftist I know IRL is a kind, passionate, generally good person while all the famous leftists online are just the most insufferable goblins imaginable all of the time?
Like, the left online is often viciously opposed to kind and unironic aesthetics/discourse even though these are the things that found mutual aid, community organizing, and fighting for a better world.
We have the most insufferably elitist and hipster online communities.
Like, why is empty critique like this so popular in leftist spaces? 2.3k likes? What goblins lmao.
In every organizing community I've ever been a part of learning how to take accountability for your actions is Organizing 101 (acknowledging intent vs acknowledging impact).
The state of web accessibility is pretty depressing.
- Standards have been around 20+ years, but 97% of the top 1mil sites fail to meet them.
- Standards are hard to learn but automating accessibility is terrible and makes it worse.
- Standards are still the bare minimum. (cont)
- Standards are the best way to make consistent experiences but this makes non-standard or novel experiences even harder to design for.
- We still largely have a "market driven" approach to accessibility, which means justifying human rights in terms of a business case.
- Veteran folks burn out all the time and new folks have a pretty hard time getting started.
- The veterans who don't burn out are often pretty grumpy and are not kind when they spot the same mistakes happening they've been seeing for 20+ years.
If you're using a low contrast/minimalist design, many users won't be able to see what is important! There is a minimum ink you should use in your data to ink ratio:
4.5:1 contrast ratio for text and 3:1 contrast ratio for geometries (non-text).
Speaking of contrast, make important elements even higher contrast. Create a hierarchy using size, boldness, or color contrast to guide the user through each step in your graphic.
Test and validate the whole graphic and all its little components work in harmony.