It’s fine to disagree with me but I’m raising a serious question: is the plan here to just maintain the fentanyl & meth addictions of people made jobless, family-less, and homeless by their addiction? If that’s the goal be honest about & don’t claim Europe did the same, it didn’t
In Netherlands & Portugal they pressure homeless street addicts to quit. They shut down the open drug scenes. They required people to live in shelters, not the street. Housing is earned. There’s less than 150 people the Dutch govt let’s shoot heroin bc methadone didn’t work.
Where the New York experiment appears to be headed is to have thousands of people administered fentanyl, heroin, meth, whatever, with no regard for getting people off those debilitating drugs so they can re-unite with families, work, and be independent, not chemically controlled
The idea, saving lives, sounds compassionate, and is something everybody supports, but where this is headed is positively Brave New World
It doesn’t have to be this way. We can just do what the Dutch, Portuguese, and every civilized nation does
Nobody has ever doubted that such facilities could reverse ODs, what’s misleading is the claim that state-sanctioned drug dens are the ONLY way, or the EUROPEAN way to do so. They are neither the European way nor the only way. In fact, they are a radical new experiment.
No society has ever decided to subsidize the addiction of anyone in these ways
In both Europe and Portugal it was a strong public reaction against addiction, not drug prohibition, that led to the crackdowns on open drug scenes
In New York, we are in Brave New World territory.
"The direct delivery of opioids to those with an opioid use disorder should raise serious concerns. The movement to establish so-called safe supply is dictated by activists who... have failed to address significant safety and ethical concerns."
"Despite the creation of over 40 supervised consumption sites, opioid overdose deaths have remained staggeringly high: more than 10,300 Canadians lost their lives to an opioid overdose between January 2016 and September 2018, the Public Health Agency of Canada recently reported."
“In their zeal to undermine the 'war on drugs' activists are creating a prison system of their own: a mental prison of perpetual, state-sponsored drug use. This prison is even more insidious because it purports to offer treatment while keeping patients trapped in their addiction”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many say climate change threatens economies but a major new report by the New York Fed says the impact of extreme weather events has been & will remain trivial
The real threat, the authors warn, comes not from climate change, but from climate policy
Over the last two years, some of the world’s most powerful and influential bankers and investors have argued that climate change poses a grave threat to financial markets and that nations must switch urgently from using fossil fuels to using renewables.
In 2019, the Fed Reserve Bank of SF warned climate change could cause banks to stop lending, towns to lose tax revenue, & home values to decline.
Last year, 36 fund managers representing $1 trillion in assets said climate “poses a systemic threat to financial markets & economy”
We considered civil disobedience and decided against it because SF is experiencing an acute police officer shortage, which is contributing to rising crime. Moreover, there is greater awareness of the urgency of the problem. And so our protest will focus on demanding action.
Progressives have long claimed homelessness is just a result of poverty, but a growing number of insiders are admitting that the unsheltered homeless live in tents to support their addiction, and that so-called "homeless advocates" are making the problem worse
In my new book, San Fransicko, I describe why progressives create and defend what European researchers call “open drug scenes,” which are places in cities where drug dealers and buyers meet, and many addicts live in tents.
Progressives call these scenes “homeless encampments,” and not only defend them but have encouraged their growth, which is why the homeless population in California grew 31 percent since 2000. This was mostly a West Coast phenomenon until recently.
Not that long ago progressive cities like Seattle and San Francisco held conferences promoting themselves, smugly, as models of “livable, walkable cities.” Now, their downtown stores are boarded up and open drug scenes have taken over the sidewalks
In early 2020, San Francisco’s progressive D.A. said drug dealing was a “victimless crime,” theft resulted from inequality, & the police were too militarized.
Today, SF is 400 cops short of the minimum, 700/year die from drugs, & looting is commonplace.
There has been a lot of gas-lightening of SF residents by highly ideological activists seeking to deny the obvious increase in crime. Often they show graphs of crime in the aggregate, inappropriately conflating homicides, robbery, & shoplifting, which is deliberately misleading.
Some crimes declined due to covid, and many of them, like car break-ins, are today above 2019 numbers, while others, like shoplifting show radically lower arrests per reports, which follows directly from the D.A.’s pledge to reduce prosecutions.
“You have to reduce the American experience to a few ridiculously grim variables, and remove everything from movies to rock n’ roll to monster dunks, to spend today sulking.”
This @mtaibbi defense of Thanksgiving is so good it pisses me off a little bit
“We don’t ask Russians how they can sit around the yelochka every New Year and open presents knowing that Ivan the Terrible used to roast prisoners in giant frying pans, or how they can smoke Belomorkanal cigarettes knowing the White Sea canal is filled with the bones of slaves.”
“The Founding Fathers may have been scum, but they didn’t just steal a continent from the indigenous, they stole one from a British King, which is, come on, hilarious. These revolutionaries — Kurt Vonnegut called them “Sea Pirates” — then drew up a document sanctifying…