Looking at abortion opinion, it's actually quite striking how little men and women differ on this question. The whole pro-life is about men telling women what to do with their bodies" schtick simply isn't grounded in reality. news.gallup.com/poll/245618/ab…
Women are somewhat more likely to say abortion should be legal under all circumstances, but that's a minority view among women as well as men. The percentage of men and who say it should be illegal in all circumstances is fluctuates right around 20%, male or female
Men are more likely to self-id as pro-life, and women as pro-choice, but when you drill down into specifics, it's clear this stems from differences in labeling quite similar views.

norc.org/PDFs/GSS%20Rep…
In 2012, 71.5% of men and 69.4% of women said abortion should be legal if there is a strong possibility of a serious fetal defect.

43.1% of men, and 43.3% of women, say it should be legal for married women who don't want more children.
If a woman's life is endangered by the pregnancy? 83.5% of men, and 82.6% of women, say abortion should be legal.

(And at least a quarter of the remaining 17% is probably accounted for by the Lizardman Constant slatestarcodex.com/2013/04/12/noi…)
What about if a woman is low income and can't afford a child?

40.4% of men, and 40.9% of women, say abortion should be legal under those circumstances; 54.9% and 55.3%, respectively, say it should be illegal.
If the pregnancy is a result of rape, 71.1% of men, and 72.8% of women, say abortion should be legal. 23% of both men and women say it should be illegal in those circumstances.
Only 39% of both men and women said abortion should be legally allowed in cases where the woman is unmarried; 52.6% of men, and 56.8% of women, said illegal.
Some 40% of men, and 43.2% of women, said abortion should be legal for any reason; 57.9% of men, and 54.2% of women, said it should be illegal.

It's the only question in which there is a gap between men and women that might exceed measurement error. But most women still opposed
Basically, large majorities think abortion should be legal for "rape, incest, and life of the mother" type exceptions, plus severe fetal defects. Only a minority of Americans think abortions should be obtainable in order to avoid the major life disruption of a healthy pregnancy
This is important because this--the life disruption of the pregnancy--is what the upper middle class women who provide the energy and the donations behind pro-choice activism & writing mostly think and talk about.
They look at polls showing the majority of the public is pro-choice, or at least doesn't want Roe overturned, and conclude that if Roe is overturned, all those people will rise up and revolt against the GOP with the fervor they themselves will bring to the cause.
But most of the public doesn't really understand what Roe said,. Even if they did, the last 10-15% of your majority coalition on abortion only wants them for severe birth defects, ultra high risk pregnancies plus rape/incest. Which is also fine with much of the pro-life coalition
Thus I'm skeptical about dark prophecies of a legitimacy crisis for the Supreme Court should it overturn Roe--or the coming electoral bloodbath for the GOP.

Most people don't care about abortion as much as pro-choice Twitter. Many of those who do are on the other side.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @asymmetricinfo

3 Dec
So far, the response from readers to this column has been "This is ridiculous, every single woman I know will be up in arms!"

First of all, that's probably not true--and second of all, it's a big country, & your circle of young, educated professionals aren't the majority.
This is a symptom of a broader problem with how American elites approach diversity. We emphasize certain kinds of demographic diversity a lot--which, yay!--but forget that highly educated professionals are unrepresentative of basically any demographic group they belong to.
Their interests, tastes, needs, and outlook all diverge significantly from the average member of their demographic group. And like all of us, they often tend to be blind to the fact that the things that matter most to them are not necessarily what others most care about.
Read 8 tweets
30 Nov
I just filed a column on how Twitter is a bottomless cesspool of negativity, so let me offer something positive and helpful: the endless braise.
If you're like me, you have a few basic braise recipes in constant circulation all winter. In my case: A tomatillo-based pork braise. A raisin-wine-worcester-and-celery oxtail braise loosely based on a reconstruction of an ancient roman dish. A tomato-wine-and-soy pot roast. Etc.
We always have liquid left over at the end. So instead of throwing it away, or just thickening and serving with pasta or tortillas, I freeze it, and use it to start the next batch.
Read 9 tweets
29 Nov
It's all part of a cycle. In the 18th and early 19th centuries, floors were covered in rich houses, but as carpets got cheaper, they filtered down to the middle class and then the working class, whereupon the rich decided the hardwood or tile floor was more tasteful.
Late in the 19th century, broadloom carpet--aka the stuff we think of as wall to wall carpeting--was invented. If you look at rich people apartments in 1930s movies, they're all covered in broadloom.
Broadloom is quiet, warm, and gives a smooth "Modern" look to those Art Deco places. However, it was vulnerable to the same cycle: as manufacturing improved and synthetics came along, broadloom got cheap. Then it got ubiquitous. Then rich people decided it was declasse.
Read 5 tweets
19 Nov
My column on the Rittenhouse verdict: the left threw away a golden opportunity to get conservatives on board with criminal justice reform. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Instead, people who are constantly tweeting about "ending mass incarceration" suddenly started sounding like the hardest core 1980s law-and-order conservatives. When talking about, let's remember, a *17 year old*.
This created the impression that what mattered was less what Rittenhouse had done, then his politics and his skin color. That was a disastrous message for criminal justice reform.
Read 6 tweets
15 Nov
I got in to Penn with a 2.7 GPA (though improving steadily throughout high school), & parents who couldn't afford to make donations. The weird smart kid who didn't do homework because they were too busy writing a novel was a definite character in the Ivies in my era. Not any more
In fairness, applications were much more labor intensive then, with no common app, and I applied to more schools than most people of my era. Unsurprisingly, given my GPA, I had a high reject rate: I got into two out of three of my reaches, but was rejected by both of my safeties.
Getting rid of the SAT is going to be one more strike against that kinds of kids. Every remaining criteria is some variation on "how hard do you try to please adults, and how well have you mastered the rarified set of social norms embraced by college admissions officers?"
Read 6 tweets
12 Nov
In the short term, I think the Metaverse is unlikely. But in the long term, it's a bet that affluent consumers are going to spend more and more time at home rather than out in the world where A/R use would be dangerous and alienating. This seems like a pretty reasonable bet.
And the fact that it hasn't shown up, 30 years after Stephenson described it ... well, Robert Heinlein predicted ubiquitous cell phones in 1948. When I graduated college in 1995, this still seemed like a pipe dream. Yet check your pockets.
Maybe V/R will never really take off because of the nausea problems. But maybe kids will embrace it first, as with all new tech, and eventually we fogies will either die off or belatedly climb on board the virtual train. I wouldn't dare try to predict from my own preferences.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(