Not just "overrated". Downright dangerous and we are still paying the price. So many of the problems in US & all over the world today can be traced back to Reagan. Even the Aryan Khan case!
He was in the right place at the right time, gets random credit for USSR collapse.
The most evil and destructive legacy of Reagan is criminalizing the possession of drugs, often with mandatory minimum sentencing disproportionately targeting minorities. And then going around the world forcing countries, including India, to criminalize drug possession too.
Most of us have grown up in a world fed on Reagan initiated alarmism about drugs. So we take it as a default that yes, if you have marijuana or cocaine or ecstasy or whatever in your possession, cops can arrest you.
Ever stopped and wondered... Why? Why is possession a "crime"?
Possession of mind altering drugs was never seen as a crime in a widespread way around the world. Addiction, yes. Health issue, yes. Something to frown upon, yes. Something to get help for, yes.
But possession as crime? That's a Reagan thing.
Sent millions to jail worldwide.
Think of all the people you know in your life. How many have cardiovascular issues? How many have diabetes? How many are alcoholic? How many are addicted to cocaine?
Pretty sure that for most people, that last number is minuscule. But it's the only one criminalized.
BTW, if you check my old blogs, you will see that I was also once favorable towards Reagan. Fed on "Reagan saved humanity from Soviet Union" and "saved US economy through deregulation" propaganda by libertarian blogs. Usually rewarded financially by American conservative groups.
It's only after reading actual US history and hearing opinions outside my then mostly brahmin male or mostly white male influence bubble, that I over the years, started realizing just how much harm Reagan did to the world. Long-lasting harm. So widespread!
Cocaine, marijuana, opium, mushrooms, pretty much all "Schedule 1" drugs have been around for centuries, if not millennia. A small percentage of humans would over indulge, maybe get addicted, ruin their lives.
The world generally thought of it as a "bad habit" not a crime.
Reagan changed that. Nixon started it. But Reagan used the most powerful position in the world to reshape it into a default where we treat drug addicts as criminals. Spend way more money on police catching never ending suppliers than on treatment or rehab.
100 years after Bolstead Act, pretty much all of USA, left right center, agrees that Prohibition was an absolutely batshit insane puritanical idea that helped organized crime more than anyone else. 100 years later, if humans survive, they will talk of "war on drugs" like that.
But they will note how Prohibition, while batshit insane and destructive, did not incarcerate, at least in large numbers, those who possessed or consumed alcohol. The gormint went after bootleggers and vendors, not alcoholics. Alcoholics weren't being jailed en masse.
Reagan has created an America (and a world) where tens if not hundreds of millions of people have been forever tagged criminals for possessing narcotic drugs. Every year, over a million people in the US are arrested for just possessing drugs. Making them felons for life.
When the US passed Prohibition, it inspired similar acts elsewhere, from Finland to the Bombay province. But at least the US govt then wasn't going around the world spreading the Prohibition gospel using carrots and sticks.
Reagan did that with his drugs obsession.
Reagan and later Bush Sr went around the world pretty much bribing and cajoling the world into also making possession of drugs illegal. And to waste resources on arresting the suppliers and vendors.
Most countries didn't really care, for centuries and millennia.
Every time I watch Narcos, I feel more and more upset at Reagan. Sleazebag played both sides of the aisle. Worked with drug cartels, took their money, when it was convenient in fighting leftist revolutionaries. Then started the war on drugs when these empowered goons flourished.
This is not some loony conspiracy theory. It has been the subject of multiple investigations. On the one hand, Reagan was criminalizing addicts. On the other hand, his administration was working with cocaine traffickers, often taking money from them.
Every year, over a million Americans are arrested for drug possession. A plurality of them for marijuana.
That's over a million people, every single year, forever branded criminals, just in the US. Not for robbing, killing, beating, harassing, embezzling. Just for possession.
In other countries, that number might even be higher. In some countries, to impress Reagan/Bush, they even death penalty for drug trafficking!
Including India! Did you know that although never used, Indian law allows capital punishment for a second trafficking offense? WTF?
So yes, the number of lives Reagan directly and indirectly destroyed just through his drug obsession, numbers in tens if not hundreds of millions. Addiction is a real problem. But it's a health problem not a law enforcement problem. The way alcoholism is treated now.
Have you ever heard of Diageo and Suntory distributors and sales reps having pitched gun battles and beheading each other? But that was the Al Capone phenomenon basically. Criminalize alcohol. And hand a great cash source to violent criminals.
That's Escobar, Chapo now.
Until Nixon and Reagan came along, no one was really thinking of drugs as a widespread problem. Coke was (and is) mostly a rich kids' indulgence. Weed, almost everyone tries, a few get hooked, no violent behavior. Heroin, serious problem, but painkillers muddy it.
The only Indian state that has, for decades, had regular gang wars between people selling alcohol - Gujarat. Which has had Prohibition forever.
You don't really see Kingfisher and Bira area managers having shootouts in Bangalore.
I am all for #AbolishICE but I'm also very much #AbolishDEA. You tell me there isn't enough money for NPR & PBS & covid relief but y'all spending billions of our tax dollars on arresting some dude in Mexico who sells coke to many people on wall street. It's such a scam!
And then they privatize prisons and give contracts too their buddies. The whole US criminal justice system is very much like Teja's dream in Andaz Apna Apna. Drug addict ka prison kholoonga.uske Liye private prison Mai hi doonga. Arrests ka badshah, prisons ka raja. Humara Reagan
I'll just end this thread by saying please people, realize how absolutely horrific and also inhuman it is that in most of the world, we arrest people for possessing some mind altering drugs. We just take it as a given. We weren't like this as a species until Reagan.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'll start. I now sleep in 2 sessions. Most nights I'm asleep at 9/10 pm and up at 3/4 AM. Then I get a lot of research work & teaching prep done. I'm at my most productive at that hour. Then sleep a couple of hrs 6am-ish.
Fun fact. I tweet the most when I'm doing cognitively demanding work. Which seems weird but that's how my brain is wired. Different thoughts keep popping up. So when I am working and an errant thought pops up, I tweet it to get it out of my brain, and return to work.
So when you see an avalanche of tweets or a long thread from me, you might think, arre Sabnis seems to have free time.
It's the opposite! I'm at my busiest. Tweeting is, weirdly, a productivity tool for me.
When I have free time, I'm not on Twitter. I'm living life. 😌
This message is love. It's cool, my friend, if you happen to read this. It's rare to find love and friendship of such intensity. Hope your best friend cherishes yours.
BTW I do remember feeling a significant resentment.... Not quite rage... But resentment at the US after college, because almost all of my close friends from childhood went to the US for masters. And I had no plans then of leaving India. So I too would look at US and go
Since India trip isn't happening this winter break, I'm thinking of using the free time to compile my long threads that got the most responses, turn them into short stories or essays, put them on Kindle for like $3 each. All proceeds going to a cause.
What do y'all think?
My long threads are spontaneous streams of consciousness. Like a steam valve for my brain which is always bubbling with thoughts and stories and memories. And I do like telling stories. And I believe I'm good at telling stories. The threads come out of that. And some resonate.
The thing is, I "write" for a living. Academic papers. That only a few hundred might ever read. But much of my work day is still writing. Very enjoyable writing BTW. I truly enjoy academic writing. The argument building, hunting for cites, pre-empting reviewers. It's fun!
Me: 90 yo bedridden gran, I used to fly every few mths to help parents. Thankfully sister, cousins, uncles, aunts the to help.
Chinese colleague: that's nice. Sister, cousin, aunt...are theoretical concepts for us.
Me: 😳😳😢
Colleague: I'm the one child of two parents who are also both one child. That's pretty much my generation. We know of sisters, uncles, aunts in theory. But for a billion of us, no personal experience. We each only have 2 parents, 4 grandparents.
Never thought of it like that!
We all know of the One Child policy but rarely do we think about what it means for life on a day to day basis or even generation to generation basis. No brothers, sisters, cousins, uncles, aunts. For a sixth of the world's population.
I wish there were detailed studies like these from the IFS about the almost near extinction of sparrows from Indian cities. They were everywhere when I was growing up in Pune and Bombay. Now they are gone.
Hope there's actual research on why, not just tweets and blogs.
I notice the sparrow deficit on every India trip cos NYC has sooooooo many sparrows! Literally every traffic light pole has a sparrows nest. So chirping sparrows are background noise for me in NYC. Like they were in 20th century India.
But in today's India, they are missing!
If you google "Indian sparrows gone", you will find a lot of social media and newspaper and news site coverage.
But not much in terms of actual research on why. Disappearance of Indian urban sparrows should get more research funding than random vedic urges, no? @ParveenKaswan
Unless you're an unabashed ethno-nationalist, explain to me why "too much diversity" is bad. I know several Indian immigrants who immigrated here, got green cards, became citizens and now want to pull up the ladder. That's an American tradition. But what is "too much diversity"?
If you cut the crap, what they are basically saying is "hey, we came to the west to mostly live with white people and cool black people here because of history and a handful of the other kinda Indians, so what are these other people doing here?".
That's the weird mentality.
I want to separate out, like in a biology lab, the "we are quasi-white" mentality that makes so many Indians fans of Trump and Hitler, from the more general American tradition and mentality of pulling up the ladder.
This bit from Bryson is very much like Douglas Adams on tech.