My latest for Pull Request!

The Smollett case, which is now going to trial (and which many are selectively forgetting) is a timely illustration of the psychological phenomenon driving us all crazy (and exacerbated by the Internet): cognitive dissonance.

thepullrequest.com/p/on-cognitive…
I open the piece with an embarrassing personal example: I accidentally walked into the women's locker room at a gym years ago. My mental model of the world was utterly wrong, but I somehow rationalized the incoming data before *finally* realizing my error and skedaddling.
My comical example is a micro-version of a much bigger phenomenon: every nation, community or political faction has an organizing narrative that collides often with an inconvenient reality, traumatizing believers who feel severe anguish. Somehow, the narrative must be rescued.
(In the sort of academic nerdery I hope PR readers appreciate, I also briefly summarize the origins of the 'cognitive dissonance' concept to a 50s-era UFO cult, and analogize that crazy story to both early Christianity...and our timeline right now.)

amzn.to/3G3uEAW
The Internet isn’t just a consensus-destruction machine, The neat narratives we cultivate to navigate a messy reality are now under constant assault by contradictory information, and the psychic stress and labor of keeping it all believable is part of what’s driving us crazy.
We’re assaulted by a constant stream of narrative grenades, making us squirm in dissonance 24/7. Those shocks are what cause the ever-increasing number of bifurcations in the metaverse, forking the prior reality into a more narratively coherent one.

Since the event exists in all narrative bubbles—there’s still some residue of shared reality—each bubble engages in the narrative machinations necessary to reconcile the discrepancy. Eventually, everyone is living in largely divergent realities.
The ‘content moderation’ debate is really about coercing the managers of the metaverse to respect the sanctity of our worldviews, and pause the flood of constant dissonance.

The thought we can actually reasonably filter (virtualized) reality such that all narrative bubbles remain unperturbed, or worse, that actually results in capital ‘T’ Truth prevailing, is either naively stupid or cravenly opportunistic (or both).
In the rare cases where truth is unignorable, as in the Smollett case, the contradictions are heightened beyond repair. Even the Internet can’t paper over that much reality. Nobody will actually walk their views back though...that would be too painful.

The dangerous thing about the metaverse isn't creating porn-and-video-game-addicted blobs always plugged in. It's creating a world without the dissonance that smacks us with reality, forcing us to turn around and run the hell out of the wrong locker room before it’s too late.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Antonio García Martínez (agm.eth)

Antonio García Martínez (agm.eth) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @antoniogm

4 Dec
Just got sucked down a rabbithole of TikTok live videos, and my soul died. It's over, there's no hope.
I took screenshots so I won't think I had some fever dream tomorrow. It's the most batshit crazy stuff ever, if this is the metaverse, it's worse than anything in the Mad Max universe.
My theory that most of the world would be reduced to some slobbering existence in an oral-culture backwater, while a minority would remain textual enough to actually function (and actually help architect the oral ghetto) seems to have gathered more evidence.
Read 4 tweets
3 Dec
Part 1 of my rollicking interview with @nfergus is finally out!

We discuss his new book 'Doom', his doubting atheism and love for Christian choral music, how many children to have, why elites seem so deficient now, and whether we'll beat the Chinese.

thepullrequest.com/p/niall-fergus…
@nfergus Historians are the discerners (or designers) of grand narrative arcs, and I asked Niall if our (post) Christian society can survive as a mostly atheist one. We both were rather skeptical. Image
@nfergus I proposed Judaism as a countervailing example of a religion that's both a binding social glue, and which doesn't require a very personal and hard-to-fake faith.

That too has some issues. Image
Read 7 tweets
28 Nov
We're going pretty hard on the Pull Request @getcallin show this week. THREE WHOLE SHOWS!

First up is @mikeeisenberg, Israeli VC and author of 'Tree of Life and Prosperity', on tonight at 9pm!

callin.com/room/michael-e…
@getcallin @mikeeisenberg His book is an interesting parallel between the key readings of the Torah and the very worldly life of venture capitalism...and just modernity more broadly.

amzn.to/3xAxRVQ
@getcallin @mikeeisenberg Then on Tuesday at 7pm Pacific we're having author and editor @bungarsargon on to discuss her new book 'Bad News', as well as co-hosts @balaji (again) and @AshleyRindsberg.

callin.com/room/batya-ung…
Read 6 tweets
27 Nov
Wonder if the world is finally ready for my “CDOs are good actually” take.

Have we all healed enough yet?
This was sparked by reading a crypto-hater’s take that crypto was the new CDO as

1. CDOs are bad,
and
2. they somehow went away as crypto will (they did not)

As long as we have sophisticated credit markets, we’ll have CDOs in some form.
What does Wall Street do?

It takes one type of risk that the economy produces and transforms it, via financial engineering, into another type of risk the capital markets actually want.

You’d think those two would be matched, but in a modern economy they often are very much not.
Read 7 tweets
23 Nov
Paul Skallas (@PaulSkallas), AKA the LindyMan, is a plagiarist.

His last post is cut-and-paste theft of my verbatim tweets, and a thin rehashing of ideas I've been posting about for a while.

Let's look at the evidence, shall we?

(Free link below.)

newsletters.feedbinusercontent.com/0cb/0cb5d4e345…
Read 11 tweets
23 Nov
On the one hand, plagiarism is a somewhat legacy sin in a world of remix and retweet culture, and true original authorship was a textual culture convention.

On the other, still kind of stings when someone literally rips your stuff word for word.
Should I bust the person?
Ok, I'm DM'ing to get his side. We are all God's creatures.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(