After a year of "review" Leander ISD in Texas has now banned 11 books from its optional book club reading lists -- and will be proceeding to ensure no student has access to them in classroom libraries. A profound shame. #FReadom
Here's the 11 banned books. Sorry to see them remove works by @MargaretAtwood @ashleyhopeperez @ShaunieDarko @amyreedfiction @ashleyhopeperez @JackieWoodson @miles_hyman @halseanderson. But they have kept works by @nikkigrimes9 @colleenaf @aaron007 @marikotamaki and others.
Some of these banned 11 books are still accessible in school libraries in Leander; but Machado's 'In the Dream House' and Hutchinson's 'Brave Face' are not in the library collections, so they're effectively inaccessible in the district now.
docs.google.com/document/d/1UD…
The review process has been plagued by inconsistencies and lack of transparency since it was launched. District leaders embarked on a whole curriculum review of 120 books after some parents complained. The books were optional reading to begin with. pen.org/a-texas-book-b…
Carmen Maria Machado's In the Dream House was targeted early at a schoolboard mtg. Hardly surprising they ultimately banned it. But quite an elaborate process was constructed... only to cave to the initial parent's demand. Here was her response in May: nytimes.com/2021/05/11/opi…
Since the fight for books in Leander began, we've seen the same tactics of parent outrage spread all over the US. Now these book banning brigades are getting bolder and more aggressive. nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-ope…
People are just calling in and emailing book complaints, and they are having an impact. Even when not making formal complaints:
Or, even when they aren't parents. School boards and school administrators need to be alert to these tactics and be ready to stand for students freedom to learn.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Friedman

Jonathan Friedman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jzfriedman

30 Nov
Reminder that as Nov ends -- many books have still been removed from school libraries based on parents' demands. Some books have been returned to the shelves, but other removals still in effect. And now reports of 'soft censorship' going on, i.e. books not being ordered, etc /1
This remains very much an attack on books about LGBTQ+ identities and race. Just look at 3 places books are being removed en masse.

First: Virginia Beach. We @PENamerica sent a letter with @ncacensorship and others last month after books were removed. /2 ncac.org/news/virginia-…
We see the same pattern of books removed in Canyons, Utah. There, no one filed any complaint whatsoever. A parent just gave a list of books she was concerned about. poof-- 9 books gone from shelves. Same subjects targeted. /3 ncac.org/news/canyons-u…
Read 8 tweets
16 Jun
A coalition of 80 scholarly and educational organizations joined us @PENamerica issuing a pubic statement today voicing firm opposition to the troublesome "divisive concepts" legislation around the country.
nytimes.com/2021/06/16/art…
"Educators owe students a clear-eyed, nuanced, and frank delivery of history so that they can learn, grow, and confront the issues of the day, not hew to some state-ordered ideology." Read the full statement and signatories here: pen.org/joint-statemen…
We write: "A white-washed view of history cannot change what happened in the past. A free and open society depends on the unrestricted pursuit and dissemination of knowledge."
Read 7 tweets
28 May
It's clear anti-CRT bills are already impeding academic freedom and teaching around the country, in different ways.

Some examples:

In Oklahoma, a fully enrolled summer college course on 'race and ethnicities' has been outright dropped. koco.com/article/oklaho…
In Idaho, Boise State abruptly suspended 52 sections of a class on diversity and ethics b/c of an odd complaint. Investigators later found nothing... but 1300+ students had their course interrupted and made 'asynchronous'. insidehighered.com/news/2021/03/1…
In Iowa, the DoE cancelled a whole conference on “Social Justice and Equity in Education" b/c of the "divisive concepts" bill there. Note, this was not b/c it was yet law-- people were "mindful" of the pending law. This is how 'chilling' of speech works. iowapublicradio.org/state-governme…
Read 7 tweets
26 Mar
Last week, we @PENamerica called the suspension of a diversity and ethics class at Boise State "unfathomable" -- an extreme reaction to halt over 50 classes for 1,300 students. Glad to see @michelleinbklyn discuss the issues surrounding it today: nyti.ms/3w48rPg
The classes were cancelled b/c of the alleged existence of a video of ONE zoom class where a student was degraded. That's unfortunate and concerning, yes, but University overreacted. Cancelled everything w/o actually seeing video. & there were no formal complaints lodged over it.
This week the University announced that the classes would no longer be suspended... But the catch is that they're being run asynchronously, while an external law firm conducts an investigation. So the classes aren't exactly suspended but they also aren't exactly running as normal
Read 6 tweets
21 Mar 19
Today's Executive Order instructs various federal agencies to take "appropriate steps" to ensure universities which receive federal research and education grants promote "free inquiry" and comply with other laws, incl the First Amendment. Here's why that's a problem. THREAD.
One, the language is completely vague. There is no further guidance on what steps would be 'appropriate' or what 'free inquiry' means. Apparently agencies might make their own guidelines to ensure compliance. That's a recipe for inconsistent interpretation and confusion.
Second, universities are enormous, decentralized beasts. The idea of tying research funds from a grant won by an individual faculty member to the decisions of administrators or faculty with regard to "free inquiry" in general is overly punitive, nonsensical, absurd.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(