Here's the deal with Boise State: There's one guy who has these horrifying ideas about women and wants to limit our opportunities. But there are HUNDREDS of faculty and staff pushing in the opposite direction.
By attending workshops, engaging in other relevant opportunities, and reflecting on our learning, Boise State employees can earn the BUILD certificate (BUILD = Boise State Uniting for Inclusion and Leadership in Diversity).
BUILD's offerings introduce faculty and staff to the research and evidence-based practices that we need to know if we're to make Boise State a welcoming place for everyone.
And yes, *everyone*—e.g., Black folks, trans folks, veterans, first-generation students, blind or D/deaf folks, older students, students who are parents, Christians, Muslims, international scholars and students, and more. Everyone.
I'm told by someone in the know that more than 500 faculty and staff have signed up to earn the BUILD certificate. (I don't know how many have completed it, but it takes a while.) I have earned the certificate, and I continue to engage with the program's excellent offerings.
So while Yenor may be in the headlines, know that SO MANY of us who work at Boise State are trying very hard to create a more inclusive and welcoming curriculum, learning environment, work culture, and overall experience for the entire Boise State community.
This is not work that can be done overnight. And we're doing it under constant threat of budget cuts from the legislature. We're surveilled, too: the IFF uses FOIA to request syllabi, email, and other materials. And then they willfully misinterpret the docs they receive. . .
. . .to fit their political agenda to narrow educational opportunities for Idahoans and others. It's infuriating, as we're the ones with mountains of evidence about what works for students, what helps people get jobs and better engage with the world in meaningful ways.
And we're not going to do this work perfectly, even under ideal conditions. We're always learning, and diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility are moving targets. We'll stumble.
I see your impatience for change. I, too, feel impatient.
But please know—whether you're a current student, a prospective student, a student's parent, or just someone curious about what the hell is going on at the university—that we are doing some really important but arduous work on top of all of our other responsibilities.
Gradually we are turning the giant ship a few degrees, and over the long term, we'll end up in a better place as an institution. You may not see us making that turn or doing the work, but so many faculty and staff are fighting the good fight in ways large and small.
And to be clear, in this thread, I'm not speaking on behalf of the university. But I do speak from my experience as someone who has worked at #BoiseState for more than a decade—and who has done so alongside faculty and staff from all corners of the university.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People are trying to get me fired for this tweet. I encourage everyone to look at how the legislature defines critical race theory in HB 377, then explain how my ideas or behavior in the classroom align with any of what is forbidden under the law. legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/upl…
The HB 377 doesn't ban the teaching of CRT. What it does is set up a straw man version of CRT. And of course I don't do any of the things that caricature of CRT includes.
Do I compel students to "compel students to personally affirm, adopt, or adhere to any" of the tenets named in the law? No.
Also, has anyone read Yenor's latest book? He has an extended section in it in which he argues that affirmative consent in sex is a bad idea and that heavy petting and foreplay pretty much forfeit a woman's right to refuse penetration.
Instead of sharing and interpreting actual, real-world rape charges and listening to the experiences of rape victims, he sets up hypotheticals where, by walking the reader through a sexual encounter step-by-step, he makes the woman seem unreasonable. . .
for refusing what he calls the "wind-up and pitch," but by which he means penetration.
Anyone has the right to stop a sexual encounter at any point. If a partner persists after that point, it's sexual assault. What's so hard to understand about that?
Here's how this kind of thing works: 1. Right-wing website doesn't interview anyone about the workshop. 2. Website's followers send threats/promise to show up & disrupt. 3. Workshop privacy settings changed for safety. 4. Website authors/followers outraged about privacy settings.
I have yet to read an article in a conservative publication that explains that (a) faculty voluntarily do professional development to become more effective teachers, (b) it's typical for universities to have teaching centers that help faculty with this development, and. . .
(c) there's an entire body of rigorously peer-reviewed literature, based on sound social science, that guides the development of teaching centers' workshops. Faculty developers and instructional designers don't make this stuff up out of thin air.
New #BoiseState pres @MarleneTromp spoke this morning to the College of Arts & Sciences faculty. It was hard not to shout AMEN! or raise praise hands during her remarks. So much of what she said resonated with my experience and observations.
@MarleneTromp spoke of the importance of the arts, humanities, social sciences, and sciences to the immediate work of the university—educating our students—but also addressed how, for example, historians and sociologists are essential to research in engineering & science.
Pres. Tromp also spoke of how those of us who understand culture need to bring our perspectives to challenges like cybersecurity because our divergent thinking is key to understanding cybercrime. I'd add climate change, gun violence, and mass migration to that list.