The so-called Scold’s Bride was never used during the Middle ages. It is, of course, a modern invention. It was invented when Galileo was using telescopes, the Pilgrims sailed to the New World, Francis Bacon was inventing empirical science, and so on.
I would love to know how often this device was used and for how long.
I’m willing to make a blind bet that the answer is “almost never” and “it was a fad that died out in one generation.”
“This term and the punishment for it appears to have gone out of use by the early 17th Century.”
Which is funny, because it also *started* in the early 17th Century.
Also, the thing was ILLEGAL.
I’ll lay down cash money to bet that there is MUCH MORE torture in this Year of Our Lord 2021 than there was in 1021, and WORSE torture too.
I recognize that “the Middle Ages” aren’t exactly precise, but I don’t think the 1620s count in *anyone’s* reckoning as “the Middle Ages.”
I go with 500-1500 because it’s easy.
500 — Rome has been sacked, the Empire is effectively gone in the West. King Arthur is founds Camelot
1500 — Luther is just a few years away from launching the Reformation.
Those are good benchmarks.
Feminists. I’m trying to be sympathetic, because gender ideology really does need a critique, but …
By “centuries” she means “10-20 years”, by “through Europe and North America” she means “in a few parts of Northern England and New England, not legal in either."
In other news, 200,000,000,000 women were burnt as witches because men just plain *hate* women.
Before we damn a whole age as “backwards and superstitious,” e.g., the Colonies at the time of the Salem Witch Trials, we should note that we too, engage in witch-hunts.
The Rittenhouse trial was an ATTEMPTED WITCHHUNT, after all, with hundreds of thousands rooting for it.
Oh yeah, there was also a version for men, which feminists are unlikely to mention. And since no one but feminists worries much about branks, I better tell you. Devotion to feminism and lies (believing and tell) are correlates.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I suspect the Wheel of Time tv series is infected with trans ideology.
It may be a small point, but the first episode opens with Moiraine saying that the Dragon Reborn could be one of five children from the Two Rivers.
This makes no sense. The Dragon is male. He is always male. He will always be male. The Dragon is the avatar of maleness.
The Wheel of Time does reincarnate people, but it is *always* the same sex. Because “being a man” and “being a woman” in WoT is to have a connection to the Divine Source, which has a Yin-Yang male/female complementary structure. The connection is EXPLICIT in Aes Sedai & Asha'man.
The more I look into the feminist critique of gender ideology, the happier I am that trans ideology is *utterly steamrolling* feminism. That old horror needs to die — trans ideology does need to be opposed, but in this case the enemy of our enemy is still our enemy.
Gender ideology and feminism are close kin in some ways. Both are Kantian — or rather, feminism is Kantian and Gender Ideology is post-Kantian, via Nietzsche to Foucault.
Feminism posits that a woman’s “true” self is her immaterial, autonomous self, which is, sadly, stapled to a natural body, which is a kind of detestable burden and hateful oppressor.
The argument from evil requires premises which cannot be established, such as
P1: We are in an epistemic position to know that God could not possibly have a justification for permitting certain evils.
P2: We are in an epistemic position to know what God would or would not do.
Note very well that the argument from evil requires establishing a NEGATIVE EXISTENTIAL, that is, it must prove that there is NO POSSIBILITY of there existing a justification for evil that God could have.
Note further that proving this Negative Existential “there is no possible justification that God could have for permitting evil” carries with it “there is no possibility of there being such a justification which is beyond human comprehension.”
It should be evident, I trust, that the ENTIRE POINT of the Logical Argument from Evil is to generate a SET of propositions, a Triad, Tetrad, howevermany-rad, in which “There is evil” + “there is a God” + [various things about God] ⇒ Contradiction.
That is why it is the LOGICAL argument from evil. Because it purports to find a LOGICAL contradiction between propositions.