This would only make sense--and would have been part of a massively resourced & intricately plotted and globally networked program of field research to (dis)confirm the 'safe & effective' hypothesis. You know, given an injection rate of a billion a month...
Instead, what seems just as likely will be enormous questions unasked, or arcanely structured to get a null result, and a non-pattern of paradoxical but painstakingly disconnected findings.
In this scenario we'll see multiple, large associations of doctors and scientists ignored or shaded by media & governments, such as the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Except here we wouldn't be talking about 3000 deaths. #TooBigToProsecute
People can always cherry-pick a study to throw mud on. One site updates daily the results of an ongoing IVM metananalysis. Wonder how the Merck meta-analysis stacks up with this, you know, as a basis for approval.
E.g., today: ivmmeta.com
This site is not anti-vcxx:
'Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available & effective for all variants. All practical, effective, & safe means should be used, including treatments, as supported by Pfizer...'
The site stresses that whatever the intervention--for prophylaxis, early treatment, symptom mitigation--be it IVM, Merck, Pfizer--
'Denying the efficacy of treatments increases the risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and increases mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage.'
Privacy lawyer:
'they have cultivated a solid base of support that combines the post-9/11 see-something-say-something paranoia of a middle-class yuppie w/ the unctuous 1980s Moral Majority sense of superiority.' cbc.ca/news/opinion/o…
'Listen closely and one might be able to discern the unmistakable sounds of our elected and unelected officials frantically firing up the gaslights and moving the goalposts on COVID restrictions and vaccinations.'
'It was a precipitous but inevitable shift from "two weeks to flatten the curve" to get the jab or lose your job, and unsurprisingly, there is still more to come. '
'the very best scientific evidence currently available to mankind does not support the widely held contention that COVID-19 vaccination using the Pfizer or Moderna brands lowers risk of death, at least over the first half-year after vaccination.' brownstone.org/articles/vacci…
'All-cause mortality is the key outcome of interest not simply because it circumvents the oftentimes subjective decision as to why someone died but also because it balances all the possible effects of a COVID-19 vaccine, both good and bad, that could influence risk of death.'
'rigid COVID-19 vaccine mandates such as that put forth by OSHA are not based on best science. Such mandates run counter to the universal medical dictum of risk stratification, whereby treatment is tailored to individuals based on individual risks and benefits to be accrued.'
Given: 1. the outstanding safety profile for Ivermectin established over decades; 2. an obviously much shorter history of devel. & use for Merck pill 3. the necessarily limited number of clinical studies (>1?)
just how much more effective *was* the Merck pill than ivermectin in the best IVM studies that Merck should get immediate authorization despite doubts while ivermectin is still only permitted in clinical studies?
Over 30 years, ivermectin has the third fewest adverse events, orders of magnitude fewer than even aspirin & tylenol (but dangerous horse paste!)...and the C19 approved ahead of it: 2.4 million adverse events reported in year 1.
'to forgo the spirit of tolerance and gentle attempts at persuasion'
Firings, school expulsions, cessation of veteran's benefits, revocation of child custody, curfews for the unvaxxed, suspension of euthanasia services, quarantine camps for C19 positives & close contacts...
'and instead taking over the steering wheel like a driving instructor when his learner is about to cause a collision.'
We wanted to give them their little democracy, but ... it proved an affront to our transcendent competence.
--signed, The Gerontocracy
Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Potential Impact on Fetal and Neonatal Development
'vaccine safety for this demographic, as well as for the developing fetus and neonate, remains to be determined.' ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/artic…
'global effort has been underway to encourage pregnant women to get vaccinated despite the uncertain risk posed to them & their offspring...post-hoc data collection, potentially for years, will be required to determine...outcomes of COVID-19 & vaccination on the next generation'
'Most COVID-19 vaccine reactions include injection site erythema, pain, swelling, fatigue, headache, fever and lymphadenopathy, which may be sufficient to affect fetal/neonatal development.'