Thread. The New York Times has published another irresponsible, dangerous article contributing to a manufactured panic about "retail theft." A few points you should know. nytimes.com/2021/12/03/bus…
First, look at the "expert" sources the reporters choose to rely on in this story. It's unbelievable, even for a paper that routinely skews toward corporate and police sources. Here are the expert sources the NYT cites, supposedly to help people understand the issue, in order:
-Corporate spokesperson
-Corporate VP
-"Retail executives and security experts"
-"Industry veterans"
-"President of the Coalition of Law Enforcement and Retail"
-"Some industry experts"
-"Head of the California retail trade group"
-Governor
-CLER president (again, twice)
-Sheriff
Notice that the first of these quotes, the opening one in the article, calls this retail shoplifting "violence." As I've written about, controlling what counts as violence against whom is a key feature of enormously unequal societies. currentaffairs.org/2020/08/why-cr…
Second, retail theft is at near historic lows. Corporate wage theft (like these retailers) dwarfs all property crime combined--about $50 billion per year, mostly from the poorest people. These truths are hardly ever told in the pages of the NYT. Ask why.
Third, do you see a pattern? Remember when the NYT recently reported a story based entirely on the false premise from a corporate PR department that Walgreens (wage theft criminal) closed stores because of shoplifting and not for business reasons?
Fourth, this article continues the weeks long push by cops and corporate marketing departments to create a a public hysteria over retail theft. Who benefits from this? What immense, existential harms in the world are ignored in favor of these stories?
Why is this important? The stakes are high for all of us: we face existential environmental, public health, and democracy-related threats to our flourishing and survival. We need news to provide accurate understanding of what can harm us and analysis of what we can do about it.
Media reprinting corporate press releases about "retail theft" and unscientific debates about whether to cage more people for shoplifting are distractions from the corporate and carceral bureaucracies that are threatening the very survival of our social fabric and our species.
We need less listening to corporate executives and police with their motives of profit and control, and more attention on what kinds of social relationships and institutions that can actually meet the scope of the threats we face.
UPDATE: It's vital to see how articles like this are used by uninformed/right-wing interests. The story contained several evidence-free assertions by corporate hacks linking retail theft to racial justice protests! And then you watch it reverberate online:
THREAD: The San Francisco Chronicle just published a Iong article on drug addiction. Prominent national journalist @ezraklein told people to "stop scrolling twitter and read it." The piece is a dangerous manipulation of a personal story for reactionary ends.
The article tells a tragic, moving story about a mom grappling with her daughter’s addiction. But this deeply personal story is leveraged to back up quietly asserted and highly consequential policy claims in favor of human caging and needles suffering.
Earlier today, I posted a disturbing story of an NBC reporter threatening a community group who questioned his police bias. I’ve now been shown an old email the reporter apparently sent to police chief calling him “bro,” inviting him for “beers,” and giving info on unhappy cops.
Here is a link to the unprofessional threat to retaliate by not covering the community group’s concerns in the news. @nbcbayarea can you confirm the authenticity of the email? Did you know about it? Do you condone the threats?
Another mystery: reporter seems to be claiming in his twitter rant against the community group that he learned of the misleading story from police twitter, but it seems like he may have close relationships with police who asked him to do an anti-bail reform story. @nbcbayarea?
This is an entire “news” article merely allowing San Jose police to repeat false talking points about “bail reform” in ways that are contrary to the scientific evidence about public health and safety and contrary to centuries of law. abc7news.com/san-jose-stree…
It could be news that the mayor and police chief of a major US city are caught misleading the public for political benefit, but instead this local reporter acts as their stenographer. Shameful.
Here is a thread with actual information in it about the issue:
Pay close attention to the statement by the "progressive" Brooklyn DA: he praises a high-level prosecutor in his office after courts found the prosecutor committed egregious misconduct (which would be a federal felony) to falsely convict Julio Negron. nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-c…
After learning what courts found this prosecutor did, local and federal officials could have prosecuted him, could have fired him, or could have just made a public comment condemning his crimes. Instead, they chose to praise him, and he keeps is promotion.
Put this systemic corruption and indifference to corruption in context: our federal lawsuit @CivRightsCorps alleges that officials are currently threatening prominent law professors for the mere act of publicizing their grievances against prosecutors. nytimes.com/2021/11/10/nyr…
This is a thread about cash bail. A number of prosecutors, police, and media pundits are blaming "bail reform" for specific crimes, like the recent tragedy in Wisconsin. Here's the truth about cash bail.
First, have you ever seen a bail hearing? Watch this video to see what we're talking about. Does this barbaric assembly line bureaucracy look like safety to you?
Second, only the U.S. and the Philippines allow for-profit cash bail. The rest of the world thinks it is grotesque and irrational to allow private corporations to profit by determining who is caged and who is free with their families based on how much cash they have.
THREAD: Yesterday, the New York Times published a headline it knew was false. The implications of this are dangerous for everyone who cares about an informed public. Here’s what happened:
The NYT wrote another pro-police propaganda piece that had all of the usual problems I’ve discussed before (more on that below). But the editors chose to add a headline that stated that “murders ‘doubled overnight’” in the Bronx, New York. Here’s where it gets devious.
Notice that NYT editors chose to put the “doubled overnight” in quotes. Why? It's a signal they aren’t reporting it as a verified fact, but as a quote from a source. In the article body, we learn they are quoting a former cop turned local professor. Here it gets more devious.