It assumes immigration is a monolithic Thing that is either good or bad.
The reality is that immigration is a necessity, a lifeblood. It is freedom of movement.
It assumes - as white supremacists do - that America is a pie that needs to be divided, and these folks think they should get their slice first.
America is a kitchen that can bake pies for everyone. We just need the ingredients (people) and recipe (law.)
It pits black people against immigrants. And divides black people into "ADOS" vs black Africans, Afro-Carribean, and Afro-Latino communities.
Why divide? To conquer, of course.
John Tanton, mastermind behind the anti-immigrant movement, knew this well. It's been a part of the white supremacy playbook for centuries. The British did it in my ancestral homeland in South Asia. It happened here in America.
So, the question is not whether "immigration" ever helped black people.
It's "how can we use immigration to dismantle white supremacy?"
Join me if you wanna talk.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
8 years ago I took the case of a young girl fleeing a horrific situation in her country. Because she got the right advice at the right time, we got her a green card as a "special immigrant juvenile."
Today, her application for naturalization was recommended for approval.
She blew through the civics, reading, and writing tests without making a single mistake: even her handwriting was the neatest I've seen!
Truthfully, this was an easy case: even getting her out of deportation years ago and winning her green card.
But a lot could have gone wrong: only a couple of years after she got her green card, Virginia decided it would no longer issue the court orders necessary to get SIJS.
My dad shared this with me today. A letter dated 60 years ago that confirms his last name registration as Ahmad.
Naming conventions differ wildly around the world. When he was born, my father was not given a "last name."
He may have been known as son of Chiragh-ud-din, his father. Or perhaps by the village of his birth, clan, or family occupation. But when he immigrated to England in the early 1960's, he needed a last name. So he picked one.
We've only been Ahmads for 60 years, as of yesterday.
In my practice, we deal with a wide variety of naming conventions: Latino conventions with both parents' last names, Chinese with the family name first, transcription variances from non-Roman alphabets, and "last names" that aren't family names.
Every time I win an asylum claim I'm struck by how much has to go right to eke out a win.
I'm overjoyed for my client, who's breathing sighs of relief through the numbness. As his lawyer, I try to prep giving a holistic view of the entire system but that's risky: too scary.
I can't say much about the claim, but his deportation would have been a death sentence. His persecutors are still looking for him.
I can't imagine the courage it takes to testify in an asylum hearing. But our judge was willing to listen and get the truth.
That's all we ask for.
Just a chance. That's what due process is about.
It was a good case. But still so many places it could have gone wrong, not the least of which was location of the court. These things shouldn't matter, but they do.
Camouflaged white nationalists Exhibit 843: @JoeGuzzardi19. This guy writes for @PFIRorg (yeah: Progressives for Immigration Reform) a Tanton-Network front group.
The usual drivel: "Haitians are coming, and Afghans too, what will we do? Remember in '22!"
What's funny - or sad - is this article came with this Bible verse:
What about these commandments, Joe?
“The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.” – Leviticus 19:34
The anti-immigrant movement should really be called the deportation movement. that's what they're really about.
Think about how different the discourse would be if we were arguing about how to let people in instead of how to keep - and kick - them out.
Nearly seventy years ago, the Supreme Court described deportation as "a drastic punishment, and at times equivalent to banishment or exile." Finding the stakes to be high, it refused to read laws resulting in deportation broadly.
Since then, Congress has passed increasingly broad deportation laws. Long-term immigrants are deported for minor infractions to countries they never knew. Others who flee persecution are deported to their deaths. The machine sweeps up even some US citizens and immigrant veterans.