1/7
According to Caixin, as local governments find it increasingly hard to sell land to property developers, and because they need to sell land to meet their revenues needs, they are turning instead to local-government financing vehicles to buy the land.
caixinglobal.com/2021-11-30/loc…
2/7
The scale isn't small, and it seems to be rising: "From July to Nov. 15, LGFVs bought 13.38% of land parcels by value across the country, up 4.38 percentage points from the January-to-June period."
3/7
These LGVFs are controlled by local governments and borrow under their guarantees, so that this effectively means that local governments are borrowing from the banks and treating the proceeds as if they were revenues.
4/7
I am surprised this is allowed, but I guess local governments have little choice if they can't otherwise sell enough land to meet revenues needs. But this represent a doubling down on the property sector.
5/7
Why? Because if the property market revives, and prices continue to rise, the LGFVs can then sell the land on and make a profit. But if the property sector doesn't revive, the LGFVs will be sitting on losses on which local governments will have to make good.
6/7
It is structures like these that make it so hard to deflate the property bubble. By making it ever more costly, they increase opposition to policies that might lead to a much-needed adjustment in the property market.
7/7
I am currently re-reading a book by Akio Mikumi and R. Taggart Murphy on Japan, and it is alarming to see how many structures and practices we saw in Japan in the late 1980s that similarly increased the vulnerability of local governments and banks to property.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

5 Dec
1/8
China Daily says that cutting tariffs on Chinese goods would help curb US inflation, and cites a gamut of US experts who agree that tariffs on Chinese goods "certainly" contribute to higher US prices.
global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202112/03/WS…
2/8
That might at first seem obvious, but it's just lazy thinking. The reason I've always opposed Trump's tariffs is because while they might affect bilateral imbalances, in today's hyperglobalized world they would have no effect on overall US deficits or Chinese surpluses.
3/8
That's because the former were driven by the US role in absorbing excess global savings, and the latter by China's domestic demand deficiencies. Because tariffs would barely affect either, they would have no impact on either country's overall trade imbalances.
Read 8 tweets
4 Dec
1/4
Most policymakers (at least those involved in financial and economic policymaking) recognize that the current model is unsustainable, David, but transitioning to a new sustainable model runs into the problems Albert Hirschman often discussed: it requires major...
2/4
institutional reforms and a redistribution of political power, not the least of which is a sharp reduction in the total revenues and expenditures of local governments. But because among other things local governments are largely responsible...
3/4
for meeting the unrealistic GDP growth targets set by Beijing, they need to be able to mobilize a lot of resources. Cutting them down to size, in other words, also means a transformation of the country's economic growth model.
Read 4 tweets
3 Dec
1/6
Charlie Munger says that markets are wildly overvalued, and its a little hard to disagree with him. In my "bezzle" piece I noted that 20 years ago Munger explained that overvalued markets are a form of bezzle, or fictitious wealth.
bloomberg.com/news/articles/… via @technology
2/6
It is fictitious because it leaves us collectively, albeit temporarily, feeling wealthier than is justified by the future production of goods and services. As Munger suggests, and as I explain in my piece, both the creation of bezzle and its amortization are pro-cyclical.
3/6
But their impacts aren't symmetrical. While bezzle-creation can artificially boost economic activity through the wealth effect, bezzle-destruction is likely to undermine economic activity much more aggressively through a negative wealth effect.
carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancial…
Read 7 tweets
2 Dec
1/10
Russell Napier correctly points out that China is facing a classic developing-country problem, which is that foreign financial inflows are self-reinforcing, so that once they are large enough relative to reserves, they can become destabilizing.
ft.com/content/7a1cbb…
2/10
This is because large inflows put upward pressure on the currency and on domestic asset prices, which in turn encourage further inflows. These inflows force up either the currency or the domestic money supply to higher levels than the authorities would like.
3/10
At some point, however, the combination of very high prices, loose money, and some external shock can set off outflows that also become self-reinforcing, but much more violently so.
Read 10 tweets
1 Dec
1/4
Turkey's trade deficit contracted by 40% in October, after a 47% contraction in September, and we'll almost certainly see a further contraction in November.
v.aa.com.tr/2433306
2/4
Before Ankara celebrates this as an increase in Turkey's international competitiveness, however, it's worth remembering how international competitiveness is typically achieved.
3/4
The massive depreciation of the lira in recent months forced up the prices of everything Turkey imports, and because all households are importers, this has had the effect of slashing real wages. As a result even as the country's...
Read 4 tweets
1 Dec
1/7
Good Al Jazeera piece on the Chinese property market with lots of CBB data: "Bank credit is being rolled out to property firms at a higher level than in any period during the second or third quarters, according to...
aje.io/gk8934 via @AJEnglish
2/7
data collected by China Beige Book International, with mortgage lending in October increasing to 200 billion yuan from 150 billion yuan the previous month."
3/7
This shouldn't surprise. There was no way Beijing could rein in credit growth without a much sharper fall in GDP growth than they were politically able to accept, so easing was inevitable, and is likely to continue into next year.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(