3) We’re learning more about adoption relinquishment trauma, and we know that babies who have a loving bond with their birth mother have the best outcomes.
4) It’s common for adoptive parents to say they are adopting because "they want what's best for the baby." Adoptive parents raising an adoptee say that they “would do anything for the child". Worthy things to say.
5) Assuming they are telling the truth, why not give a financially challenged birth mother their $60,000-$70,000, plus monthly support matching the costs they would have paid while raising the child, so that the birth mother can raise her baby in economically sound circumstances?
6) Based on everything we know, that would, by definition, be "what's best for the baby".
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A few years ago my husband @benblair and my brother @floodstreet set out to create the most affordable, accredited, U.S.-based online university, and make it available to students all over the world. And they've succeeded. It's called Newlane University.
Each @NewlaneU degree is $1500, paid at $40/month. If you want to earn an Associates Degree & Bachelors Degree, that’s $3000 total. If you already have an Associates Degree, and want to earn a Bachelors Degree, it would be $1500. (The cheapest degree I've seen elsewhere is $5k.)
When you sign up, there's a one-time $249 registration fee. Try the program for 30 days and if it's not a good fit, no worries, they'll refund the fee. And you can pause the $40/mo at any time — like if there's a family matter that prevents you from studying for a few months.
Finally read the kidney donation story. I know you've been waiting breathlessly for my thoughts. Here they are:
- If you didn't read till the end, you don't know the story. The writer of the article saved major facts for the end, and they very much affected the story.
- There was straight up plagiarism. The author knew she was doing it, openly acknowledged it to others, was (a little) worried about it, and did it anyway. She later altered the plagiarism, hoping to avoid trouble. But alas, trouble was not avoided.
- The comments on the actual story, and the comments on Twitter are basically opposites. Again, if you haven't read the whole story, you're getting a warped view of what happened.
Hey fellow #LDS#Mormons, I know this stresses some of you out, but the Church stance is pro-legal abortion. If we want abortions available for incest, rape, or health of the mother, that requires legal abortion. If you agree with the Church, you are also pro-legal abortion.
This may stress you out further, but we could also accurately say the Church is pro-choice — we want those who we think "qualify" for an abortion to be able to choose one if they want. That's pro-choice.
If the Church stance changes, and all abortions are forbidden no matter what — even for cases like: the pregnancy is killing the mother, the fetus has died in utero, or an 11 yr old child was raped and impregnated by her father — then that would be an anti-abortion stance.
Critical Race Theory is the current time-waster/energy-suck of Republicans. It’s a nonexistent “problem” that they force to the front of all conversations. Then they try and “solve” the problem with unnecessary and unhelpful legislation.
1/x
This is what this time-wasting strategy would look like when applied to a hospital. Imagine an operating room where a patient is waiting for a kidney transplant. There are two doctors:
2/x
Dr 1: Shall we begin the kidney transplant?
Dr 2: It’s not the right time to talk about kidney transplants. I’m starting to suspect you are trying to ignore the ping-pong problem?
Dr 1: What? What are you talking about? What is a “ping-pong problem”?
3/x
I was in the U.S. for a few days and got a Covid vaccine shot. I mentioned this on Instagram and readers from around the world reported on the vaccine status where they live. I don’t think most Americans have a sense of what is happening elsewhere. Here are some of the comments.
I’m not radicalized because I want to abolish police. I thought it was radical when I first learned about it, but I was wrong. It’s not radical. Abolishing the police is the normal, common sense, middle-of-the-road position.
Do even a small amount of reading about the history of policing, the purpose of policing, the current state of policing, and the fact that the Supreme Court has made clear that police have ZERO legal duty to protect citizens, and the only logical conclusion is abolition.
If you do the reading and come to any other conclusion, the radical position is yours.