Treasury just issued this media advisory on @TreasuryDepSec's speech at 10am Monday, which will unveil Treasury's anti-corruption plans. They're banging the war drum.
The strength of Treasury policies depends a lot on the details, so here's a thread reviewing my recommendations.
Let's start with what @IanTalley and @dnvolz reported last night, which is that in addition to sanctions, Treasury will be taking actions this week to increase the transparency of corporate ownership and close loopholes in the real estate market. wsj.com/articles/u-s-t…
With regards to beneficial ownership, FinCEN is expected to release the rule that they've been drafting most of this year prescribing which entities will have to report their ownership information to Treasury. OIRA completed its final review of the draft rule four days ago (⬇️).
Here's my piece recommending how the rule should broadly scope the entities and info covered by the reporting obligations, limit exemptions to companies that already disclose ownership, verify info for accuracy, and broadly ensure timely & easy data access.securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/regulating-ben…
That was before the #PandoraPapers, which revealed lots of dirty money flowing into US trusts. Here's a thread on how FinCEN should write its rule to maximize the extent to which the registry can cover trusts, within some significant statutory constraints.
With regards to real estate, my guess is they'll issue a new rule permanently imposing the reporting obligations title insurers face under geographic targeting orders.
The key details will involve how much the scope is expanded versus current GTOs. I recommend six expansions. ⬇️
Really going big on anti-money laundering rules for the real estate market would mean not just making GTO duties permanent but also expressing an intention to impose AML rules on the full range of real estate professionals (realtors, escrow, lawyers, etc).
Beyond beneficial ownership and real estate, I've been recommending Treasury launch a broader mission to impose AML rules on all manner of professional enablers.
As described below, that would ideally also include antiquities dealers, investment advisors, and art dealers.
Of those additional priorities, the two that I have reason to believe they've been doing some work on are the antiquities rule (left image) and an art market study (right image), both statutorily due Dec. 27). In both cases the key is to capture a broad set of dealers (right).
Lastly on AML, to get Congress moving on more authorities, Treasury could announce it supports the Enablers Act, which is important to pass before the midterms and would give Biden's Treasury plenty of anticorruption implementation to focus on in the final two years in office.
And beyond FinCEN/AML issues, I've recommended a whole-of-Treasury anticorruption strategy, including Int'l Affairs, OFAC, OIA, and others. ⬇️securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/treasurys-war-…
That's my entire wish list. I don't expect Treasury will deliver a majority of these reforms, because frankly corruption hasn't been as high on their agenda as other issues like corporate taxes, pandemic recovery, and climate change. foreignaffairs.com/articles/2021-…
But it's great to see that @TreasuryDepSec has a major speech on this issue and will reportedly deliver reforms around beneficial ownership and real estate transparency. Let's hope for strong details on those issues and maybe a couple more proposals from the wish list above! 🤞
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s dangerously naive to view Trump as simply another “isolationist” whose foreign policy echoes nothing darker than Americans’ historical urges to pull back from the world.
Kupchan argues that Trump’s unilateralism strongly resembles the US isolationist grand strategy first articulated in George Washington’s 1796 farewell address, which set out a “policy to steer clear of permanent alliances” that lasted until the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941.
This piece is an embarrassment to @ForeignPolicy, which should issue a retraction.
It's by a MidEast columnist who cherrypicked quotes and facts to weave her own narrative that'll now be used by the Kremlin's useful idiots to undermine support for Ukraine.foreignpolicy.com/2024/07/29/ukr…
What’s the basis for claiming in the opening sentence that corruption has undermined Ukraine’s fight against Russia?
It’s certainly not supported by the first former official quoted in the piece, who says just the opposite—that reforms aren’t the issue stopping Ukraine from joining NATO.
This reform brings Ukraine in compliance with the @FATFNews standard of making banks closely scrutinize the finances of politically exposed persons or PEPs (i.e., former public officials who could benefit from corruption) for the rest of their lives, rather than just three years.
As background, see this article in @EuropeanPravda.
PEP reform was "the last main obstacle to the [EU] negotiations" and Zelensky's government was having a hard time getting its proposal through the parliament due to opposition among lawmakers who don't want to be lifelong PEPs.
Even as Ukrainian generals and soldiers fight to expel Russian invaders, a second army of state bureaucrats and civil society experts in Kyiv has been quietly mobilizing to win the peace.
Two new reports from @gmfus, @brdo_ukraine, @IAAUkraine, & @RISE_Ukraine_ map these actors.
As we've spoken to officials planning for a Marshall Plan for Ukraine, we've realized they often don't have a clear picture of all the new government bodies and civil society coalitions that have sprout up in Kyiv to prepare for reconstruction.
That's why we did this research.
Our first report, led by @brdo_ukraine, focuses on Ukrainian government institutions. ⬇️gmfus.org/news/kyivs-mob…
Wow! I had heard that this was in the works, but the details are strikingly strong. 💪
Good of the @WhiteHouse for sending the G7 donor coordination platform this list of 25 reforms that Ukraine must implement in order to continue receiving US assistance. news.yahoo.com/white-house-le…
Two of my favorite aspects of this list are how the priorities are sequenced over the next 18 months and how they've prioritized reforms to give the specialized anti-corruption agencies more resources and authorities, with specific line items for SAPO, NABU, NACP, HACC, and ARMA.
If you think that's an alphabet soup of esoteric bureaucracy, Putin disagrees. In his vitriolic speech three days before fully invading, he named these Ukrainian anti-corruption institutions and bemoaned their leadership selection processes and US support. en.kremlin.ru/events/preside…
NEW REPORT: Ukraine is halfway through a hero’s journey with a dual conflict against Russia and oligarchy.
Ukrainian anti-corruption is vital to the rules-based order. @NormEisen, Cameron Bertron, and I offer 25 ways stakeholders in that order can help. 🧵gmfus.org/news/ukraines-…
We start by setting the record straight on Ukrainian anti-corruption.
Here's what the Kremlin and its useful idiots leave out from their narrative about corruption in Ukraine:
Never in history has a nation built such a sweeping array of anti-corruption institutions in a decade.
This success drove Putin to invade. See what he did on the date of Feb 21 – a year apart, in 2021 & 2022.
2/21/2021: Started mobilizing “large-scale exercises” hours after Medvedchuk’s assets seized
2/21/2022: Named Ukraine’s rule-of-law institutions in his vitriolic war speech